Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

Faculty Scholarship

Duke Law

Social and Behavioral Sciences

1983

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Private Credentialing Of Health Care Personnel: An Antitrust Perspective, Part 1, Clark C. Havighurst, Nancy M. P. King Jan 1983

Private Credentialing Of Health Care Personnel: An Antitrust Perspective, Part 1, Clark C. Havighurst, Nancy M. P. King

Faculty Scholarship

This Article explores the antitrust and other implications of private credentialing and accrediting programs in the health care industry. Although such programs are usually sponsored by powerful competitor groups, they serve the procompetitive purpose of providing useful information and authoritative advice to independent decision makers. Part One examines the risk that credentialing will sometimes be unfair to competitors and deceive consumers. Its survey of common-law, antitrust, and regulatory interventions to correct such unfairness and deception seeks to determine the degree of oversight to which credentialing and similar activities have been and should be subjected. In recommending that judicial or regulatory …


Foreword: Symposium On Hospital Law, Clark C. Havighurst Jan 1983

Foreword: Symposium On Hospital Law, Clark C. Havighurst

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Health Planning And Antitrust Law: The Implied Amendment Doctrine Of The Rex Hospital Case, Clark C. Havighurst Jan 1983

Health Planning And Antitrust Law: The Implied Amendment Doctrine Of The Rex Hospital Case, Clark C. Havighurst

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Private Credentialing Of Health Care Personnel: An Antitrust Perspective, Part 2, Clark C. Havighurst, Nancy M. P. King Jan 1983

Private Credentialing Of Health Care Personnel: An Antitrust Perspective, Part 2, Clark C. Havighurst, Nancy M. P. King

Faculty Scholarship

Having argued in Part One against extensive judicial or regulatory interference with private personnel credentialing in the health care field, this Article now shifts its focus to emphasize the anticompetitive hazards inherent in credentialing as practiced by professional interests. Competitor-sponsored credentialing is shown to be a vital part of a larger cartel strategy to curb competition by standardizing personnel and services and controlling the flow of information to health care consumers. Instead of altering the conclusions reached in Part One, however, Part Two sets forth a new and hitherto unexplored agenda for antitrust enforcement, one that the authors believe will …