Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Discovery (2)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Litigation (2)
-
- United States Constitution (2)
- Ackermann v. United States (1)
- Aikens v. Ingram (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Burden (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Comparative (1)
- Comparative Civil Procedure (1)
- Cultural practices (1)
- Discovery (Law) (1)
- Evidence spoliation (1)
- Exceptional Circumstances (1)
- Extraordinary Circumstances (1)
- Extraterritorial (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Rule 60(b)(6)) (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial power (1)
- Notice pleading (1)
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities L.L.C. 685 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (1)
- Plausibility standard (1)
- Pleading (1)
- Pleading Standards (1)
- Relief from Judgment (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking Extraordinary Circumstances, Scott Dodson
Rethinking Extraordinary Circumstances, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
This short essay for Northwestern University Law Review's Colloquy seeks to rationalize the "extraordinary circumstances" doctrine of Rue 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The usual rule is that a movant for Rule 60(b)(6) relief must show extraordinary circumstances for that relief. Under the Ackermann rule (so named after the Supreme Court decision that spawned it), courts have held that any extraordinary circumstances cannot have been caused by the movant's own litigation conduct. I argue that the Ackermann rule, at its broadest, would be unjust to those litigants most in need of Rule 60(b)(6) relief and would overserve …
The Judicial Power And The Inferior Federal Courts: Exploring The Constitutional Vesting Thesis, A. Benjamin Spencer
The Judicial Power And The Inferior Federal Courts: Exploring The Constitutional Vesting Thesis, A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
Although the Constitution vests the "Judicial Power" of the United States in the Supreme Court and in any inferior courts that Congress establishes, both Congress and the Court have long propounded the traditional view that the inferior courts may be deprived cognizance of some of the cases and controversies that fall within that power. Is this view fully consonant with the history and text of Article III? One possible reading of those sources suggests that the Constitution vests the full Judicial Power of the United States in the inferior federal courts, directly extending to them jurisdiction over matters that Congress …
The Preservation Obligation: Regulating And Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation In Federal Court, A. Benjamin Spencer
The Preservation Obligation: Regulating And Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation In Federal Court, A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
The issue of discovery misconduct, specifically as it pertains to the prelitigation duty to preserve and sanctions for spoliation, has garnered much attention in the wake of decisions by two prominent jurists whose voices carry great weight in this area. In Pension Committee of University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities LLC, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin-of the Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC2 e-discovery casespenned a scholarly and thorough opinion setting forth her views regarding the triggering of the duty to preserve potentially relevant information pending litigation and the standards for determining the appropriate sanctions for various breaches …
Global Civil Procedure Trends In The Twenty-First Century, Scott Dodson
Global Civil Procedure Trends In The Twenty-First Century, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
Recent scholarship in comparative civil procedure has identified
“American exceptionalism” as a way to describe practices which set the
United States apart from most of the world, particularly the civil law world.
This Article focuses on two areas of “exceptionalism”: pleading standards
and the role of judges. Specifically, pleading requirements are considerably
less strict in the United States compared to other countries. Additionally,
U.S. judges are less active in conducting litigation than their counterparts
elsewhere, especially judges in the civil law tradition. This Article traces
some modern trends toward convergence between the United States and
the rest of the world. …
Making Sense Of Twombly, Edward D. Cavanagh
Making Sense Of Twombly, Edward D. Cavanagh
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In May 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and sent shockwaves throughout the federal civil justice system. Reversing the Second Circuit, the Court held that an antitrust complaint that alleged mere parallel behavior among rival telecommunications companies, coupled with stray averments of agreement that amounted merely to legal conclusions, failed as a matter of law to state a claim for conspiracy in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act and had been properly dismissed by the trial court. The Court then proceeded to (1) redefine the concept of notice pleading by "retiring" …
Jurisdictional Discovery In Transnational Litigation: Extraterritorial Effects Of United States Federal Practice, S. I. Strong
Jurisdictional Discovery In Transnational Litigation: Extraterritorial Effects Of United States Federal Practice, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
This article describes the device in detail, distinguishing it both practically and theoretically from methods used in other common law systems to establish jurisdiction, and discusses how recent US Supreme Court precedent provides international actors with the means of limiting or avoiding this potentially burdensome procedure.
Rulemaking, Litigation Culture And Reform In Federal Courts, Edward D. Cavanagh
Rulemaking, Litigation Culture And Reform In Federal Courts, Edward D. Cavanagh
Faculty Publications
Culturally based litigation practices are central to the policies of federal courts. Unlike the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, cultural based practices are neither uniform nor explicitly defined among the federal courts. These practices are specifically tailored to ensure judicial efficiency, and in turn, they heavily influence practice and procedure in federal courts. This Article examines the significance of cultural litigation practices and their influence on amending or establishing new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The author proposes that rulemaking must compliment cultural practices in order to be successful and concludes that when conflict exists between these practices and rulemaking, …
Erie’S Suppressed Premise, Michael S. Green
Erie’S Suppressed Premise, Michael S. Green
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.