Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law reform (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Constitutional violations (2)
- Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
- Authority (1)
-
- Compliance (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Decision making (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Enumerated powers (1)
- Equality (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Habeas review (1)
- Institutional capacity (1)
- Internal links canon (1)
- Judicial interpretation (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Justice (1)
- Lawmaking (1)
- Legal norms (1)
- Legal philosophy (1)
- Limitations (1)
- Police power (1)
- Postconviction challenges (1)
- Prisoners (1)
- Prisons (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Limits Of Enumeration, Richard A. Primus
The Limits Of Enumeration, Richard A. Primus
Articles
According to a well-known principle of constitutional interpretation here identified as the “internal-limits canon,” the powers of Congress must always be construed as authorizing less legislation than a general police power would. This Article argues that the internallimits canon is unsound. Whether the powers of Congress would in practice authorize any legislation that a police power would authorize is a matter of contingency: it depends on the relationship between the powers and the social world at a given time. There is no reason why, at a given time, the powers cannot turn out to authorize any legislation that a police …
Substantive Habeas, Kimberly A. Thomas
Substantive Habeas, Kimberly A. Thomas
Articles
Substantive Habeas identifies the US. Supreme Court's recent shift in its habeas jurisprudence from procedure to the substance of habeas review and explores the implications of this change. For decades, the US. Supreme Court has attempted to control the flood of habeas corpus petitions by imposing procedural requirements on prisoners seeking to challenge constitutional error in their cases. These restrictive procedural rules have remained at the center of habeas decision making until recently. Over the past few years, instead of further constraining the procedural gateway for habeas cases, the Supreme Court has shifted its focus to the substance of habeas. …
Unfriendly Unilateralism, Monica Hakimi
Unfriendly Unilateralism, Monica Hakimi
Articles
This Article examines a category of conduct that I call “unfriendly unilateralism.” One state deprives another of a benefit (unfriendly) and, in some cases, strays from its own obligations (noncompliant), outside any structured international process (unilateral). Such conduct troubles many international lawyers because it looks more like the nastiness of power politics than like the order and stability of law. Worse, states can abuse the conduct to undercut the law. Nevertheless, international law tolerates unfriendly unilateralism for enforcement. A victim state may use unfriendly unilateralism against a scofflaw in order to restore the legal arrangement that existed before the breach. …
Universalism And Civil Rights (With Notes On Voting Rights After Shelby), Samuel R. Bagenstos
Universalism And Civil Rights (With Notes On Voting Rights After Shelby), Samuel R. Bagenstos
Articles
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder, voting rights activists proposed a variety of legislative responses. Some proposals sought to move beyond measures that targeted voting discrimination based on race or ethnicity. They instead sought to eliminate certain problematic practices that place too great a burden on voting generally. Responses like these are universalist, because rather than seeking to protect any particular group against discrimination, they formally provide uniform protections to everyone. As Bruce Ackerman shows, voting rights activists confronted a similar set of questions—and at least some of them opted for a universalist approach—during the campaign …