Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Internet (2)
- Funding (1)
- Copyright (1)
- World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
- Information law (1)
-
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Public (1)
- Public domain (1)
- Instant messaging (1)
- FCC (1)
- Trademarks (1)
- Scientific research (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Science (1)
- Internet domain names (1)
- Human genome (1)
- First to invent (1)
- Human Genome Project (1)
- Information platforms (1)
- Technology (1)
- Private (1)
- Telecommunications regulation (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking The United States First-To-Invent Principle From A Comparative Law Perspective: A Proposal To Restructure § 102 Novelty And Priority Provisions, Toshiko Takenaka
Rethinking The United States First-To-Invent Principle From A Comparative Law Perspective: A Proposal To Restructure § 102 Novelty And Priority Provisions, Toshiko Takenaka
Articles
This Article first examines the novelty and priority provisions of first-to-file countries, and then compares them with U.S. counterparts to identify major differences and determine why these differences result. The Article discusses the origins of the complex structure adopted by § 102 to define prior art and the difficult interpretation given to terms used in the novelty definition. This Article then reviews the USPTO's practice of the novelty examination and the priority determination in interference proceedings. This review confirms the first-to-file patent professional's perception that the United States, in fact, follows the first-to-file principle, although it also provides ...
Icann's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"- Causes And (Partial) Cures, A. Michael Froomkin
Icann's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"- Causes And (Partial) Cures, A. Michael Froomkin
Articles
No abstract provided.
Public Vs. Proprietary Science: A Fruitful Tension?, Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Richard R. Nelson
Public Vs. Proprietary Science: A Fruitful Tension?, Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Richard R. Nelson
Articles
What should be public and what should be private in scientific research? The competitive sprint of public and private laboratories to complete the sequence of the human genome has brought this question to the fore. The same question frames the developing struggle over terms of access to human embryonic stem cell lines and the conflict between Microsoft and the open source movement over how best to promote software development. We expect such conflicts to become more widespread as the role of for-profit research expands in a broader range of scientific fields. Will science progress more swiftly and fruitfully if its ...
Law And Information Platforms, Philip J. Weiser