Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Equal protection (3)
- Gay rights (3)
- Federalism (2)
- Homosexuals – law (2)
- Lawrence v. Texas (2)
-
- Same-sex marriage (2)
- Supreme Court decisions (2)
- Animus (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Compelled speech (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- DOMA (1)
- Definition of Marriage (1)
- Don't ask don't tell (1)
- Fair (1)
- Forum for academic and institutional rights (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom (1)
- Freedom of association (1)
- Gay Marriage (1)
- Gay civil rights (1)
- Gay couples - family law (1)
- Gay history (1)
- Gay marriage (1)
- Gay stereotypes (1)
- Gays (1)
- Homosexuals (1)
- Homosexuals law (1)
- Law schools (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Lgbt Equality, Religious Liberty, And Masterpiece Cakeshop, Dale Carpenter
Lgbt Equality, Religious Liberty, And Masterpiece Cakeshop, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Windsor Products: Equal Protection From Animus, Dale Carpenter
Windsor Products: Equal Protection From Animus, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. Windsor has puzzled commentators, who have tended to overlook or dismiss its ultimate conclusion that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional because it arose from animus. What we have in Justice Kennedy’s opinion is Windsor Products — an outpouring of decades of constitutional development whose fountainhead is Carolene Products and whose tributaries are the gay-rights and federalism streams. This paper presents the constitutional anti-animus principle, including what constitutes animus, why it offends the Constitution, and how the Supreme Court determines it is present. The paper also discusses why the Court was …
Straight Acting, Dale Carpenter
Straight Acting, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article explores the meaning of “straight acting,” a term one often hears among gay people. How, why, and by whom is it used? What purposes does it serve and what purposes does the reaction to it serve? How does its use by gays compare to the use of the term “acting white” by blacks? And, since this is a law journal, there's the necessary question: what is law's role in straight acting?
Unanimously Wrong, Dale Carpenter
Unanimously Wrong, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The Supreme Court was unanimously wrong in Rumsfeld v. FAIR. Though rare, it's not the first time the Court has been unanimously wrong. Its most notorious such decisions have come, like FAIR, in cases where the Court conspicuously failed even to appreciate the importance of the constitutional freedoms under attack from legislative majorities. In these cases, the Court's very rhetoric exposed its myopic vision in ways that now seem embarrassing. Does FAIR, so obviously correct to so many people right now, await the same ignominy decades away? FAIR was wrong in tone, a dismissive vox populi, adopted by a Court …
Bad Arguments Against Gay Marriage, Dale Carpenter
Bad Arguments Against Gay Marriage, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article claims that three common arguments against gay marriage - the definitional, procreation, and slippery-slope arguments - are quite bad, the worst of the lot. The definitional argument asserts that marriage just is the union of one man and one woman, and that the definition alone is a sufficient defense against claims for gay marriage. The procreation argument claims that marriage's central public purpose is to encourage procreation, and so the exclusion of same-sex couples is justified. The slippery-slope argument claims that the acceptance of same-sex marriage logically entails the acceptance of other public policy changes - notably the …
Is Lawrence Libertarian?, Dale Carpenter
Is Lawrence Libertarian?, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. Texas is no doubt a shock to those pursuing an antihomosexual agenda. To most Americans, however, the decision is less an ipse dixit announcing radical social change than it is a belated recognition of what they had already learned about the humanity and dignity of gay people. Rather than radically changing constitutional principle, the Court has corrected its own erroneous understanding of the facts that underlay its application of constitutional principle in the past. Rather than leading the nation, the Court has caught up to it.
Part I of this essay lays out …
Four Arguments Against A Marriage Amendment That Even An Opponent Of Gay Marriage Should Accept, Dale Carpenter
Four Arguments Against A Marriage Amendment That Even An Opponent Of Gay Marriage Should Accept, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
In this article, the author argues against a federal constitutional amendment preventing states from recognizing same-sex marriages. As of now, a nationwide policy debate is underway on the merits of providing full marital recognition to gay couples. That debate is still in its infancy and is proceeding in a variety of ways, with divergent policy choices in the states. It should not be cut short by the extraordinary mechanism of a constitutional amendment that would substantially delay or permanently foreclose what may turn out to be a valuable social reform.
To summarize, the four main points the author makes are: …
The Unknown Past Of Lawrence V. Texas, Dale Carpenter
The Unknown Past Of Lawrence V. Texas, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article is an attempt to fill in some of the gaps in the public's knowledge of the case Lawrence v. Texas. Much of the rich post-arrest history of the case has been ignored. But for the courage, insight, and initiative of three men in particular, the arrest might have been another forgotten episode in what the author calls the under history of the Texas sodomy law, the history not told in appellate opinions or in most other accounts.
Section II reviews the "somewhat known" past, tracing the evolution of the Texas sodomy law from a statute so facially …
Does The Texas Homosexual Conduct Law Violate The Fourteenth Amendment, Dale Carpenter
Does The Texas Homosexual Conduct Law Violate The Fourteenth Amendment, Dale Carpenter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.