Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Common law (9)
- Common Law (2)
- Erie v. Tompkins (2)
- Federal common law (2)
- Federal courts (2)
-
- Federal law (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Legal history (2)
- State law (2)
- Supremacy Clause (2)
- Swift v. Tyson (2)
- ATS (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion Act 1967 (1)
- Act of state doctrine (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Alien Tort Statute (1)
- Appropriations Clause (1)
- Arising under jurisdiction (1)
- Article III (1)
- British Empire (1)
- Canon law (1)
- Common law adjudication (1)
- Comparative Statutory Interpretation (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright Act of 1976 (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Customary international law (1)
- Due diligence (1)
- Duty of care (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
Advisory Opinions And The Problem Of Legal Authority, Christian R. Burset
Advisory Opinions And The Problem Of Legal Authority, Christian R. Burset
Journal Articles
The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we’ve misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions.
This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only …
Equity, Samuel L. Bray
Equity, Samuel L. Bray
Book Chapters
From the Publisher
Chapter 2
How has equity been received in the United States? Two themes stand out. One is that of ‘nice adjustment’: the case-specific adjustment of legal rules to avoid the harsh results of applying rules to unforeseen circumstances. The second is the idea of judicial command: ordering the particular defendant in the circumstances to do equity without contradicting the common law. While the former has waned in the US, the latter has overly strengthened. The reasons of legal culture are discussed.
Outlining The Case For A Common Law Duty Of Care Of Business To Exercise Human Rights Due Diligence, Douglass Cassell
Outlining The Case For A Common Law Duty Of Care Of Business To Exercise Human Rights Due Diligence, Douglass Cassell
Journal Articles
This article outlines the case for a business duty of care to exercise human rights due diligence, judicially enforceable in common law countries by tort suits for negligence brought by persons whose potential injuries were reasonably foreseeable. A parent company’s duty of care would extend to the human rights impacts of all entities in the enterprise, including subsidiaries. A company would not be liable for breach of the duty of care if it proves that it reasonably exercised due diligence as set forth in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. On the other hand, a company’s failure to …
Reading Statutes In The Common Law Tradition, Jeffrey A. Pojanowski
Reading Statutes In The Common Law Tradition, Jeffrey A. Pojanowski
Journal Articles
There is wide agreement in American law and scholarship about the role the common law tradition plays in statutory interpretation. Jurists and scholars of various stripes concur that the common law points away from formalist interpretive approaches like textualism and toward a more creative, independent role for courts. They simply differ over whether the common law tradition is worth preserving. Dynamic and strongly purposive interpreters claim the Anglo-American common law heritage in support of their approach to statutory interpretation, while arguing that formalism is an unjustified break from that tradition. Formalists reply that the common law mindset and methods are …
Statutes In Common Law Courts, Jeffrey Pojanowski
Statutes In Common Law Courts, Jeffrey Pojanowski
Journal Articles
The Supreme Court teaches that federal courts, unlike their counterparts in the states, are not general common law courts. Nevertheless, a perennial point of contention among federal law scholars is whether and how a court’s common law powers affect its treatment of statutes. Textualists point to federal courts’ lack of common law powers to reject purposivist statutory interpretation. Critics of textualism challenge this characterization of federal courts’ powers, leveraging a more robust notion of the judicial power to support purposivist or dynamic interpretation. This disagreement has become more important in recent years with the emergence of a refreshing movement in …
Foreward: Erie's Gift, Jay Tidmarsh
Foreward: Erie's Gift, Jay Tidmarsh
Journal Articles
Sometimes described as "one of the modem cornerstones of our federalism," Erie stands at its narrowest for a simple proposition: When a federal court decides a claim whose source is state law, the court must apply the same substantive common-law rules that a state court would apply to the claim. Dictated by statute, by policy, and by the Constitution, this result seems "superbly right" to many. Indeed, Erie's narrow holding is not controversial today.
Shedding Light On Shady Grove: Further Reflections On The Erie Doctrine From A Conflicts Perspective, Joseph P. Bauer
Shedding Light On Shady Grove: Further Reflections On The Erie Doctrine From A Conflicts Perspective, Joseph P. Bauer
Journal Articles
This Article, a contribution to the Notre Dame Law Review symposium issue on the Supreme Court’s recent Shady Grove decision, is a follow-up to an article published in the same journal eleven years ago, in which I suggested that the Erie doctrine could be usefully informed by drawing on caselaw and jurisprudence from the horizontal choice of law setting. Shady Grove addressed the question of whether a New York state law, barring the assertion of claims for statutory damages, was binding in an action brought in the federal courts, or whether Federal Rule 23, which does not contain a similar …
The Appropriations Power And Sovereign Immunity,, Jay Tidmarsh, Paul F. Figley
The Appropriations Power And Sovereign Immunity,, Jay Tidmarsh, Paul F. Figley
Journal Articles
Discussions of sovereign immunity assume that the Constitution contains no explicit text regarding sovereign immunity. As a result, arguments about the existence-or nonexistence-of sovereign immunity begin with the English and American common-law doctrines. Exploring political, fiscal, and legal developments in England and the American colonies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, this Article shows that focusing on common-law developments is misguided. The common-law approach to sovereign immunity ended in the early 1700s. The Bankers' Case (1690- 1700), which is often regarded as the first modern common-law treatment of sovereign immunity, is in fact the last in the line of English …
The Federal Common Law Of Nations, Anthony J. Bellia, Bradford R. Clark
The Federal Common Law Of Nations, Anthony J. Bellia, Bradford R. Clark
Journal Articles
Courts and scholars have vigorously debated the proper role of customary international law in American courts: To what extent should it be considered federal common law, state law, or general law? The debate has reached something of an impasse, in part because various positions rely on, but also are in tension with, historical practice and constitutional structure. This Article describes the role that the law of nations actually has played throughout American history. In keeping with the original constitutional design, federal courts for much of that history enforced certain rules respecting other nations' perfect rights (or close analogues) under the …
Procedural Common Law, Amy Coney Barrett
Procedural Common Law, Amy Coney Barrett
Journal Articles
Debates about the common lawmaking power of the federal courts focus exclusively on substantive common law. But federal common law is not limited to matters of substance; it reaches matters of procedure as well. Federal law includes a robust body of what might be called procedural common law - common law primarily concerned with the regulation of internal court processes rather than substantive rights and obligations. This body of law includes many doctrines that are fixtures in the law of procedure and federal courts. For example, abstention, forum non conveniens, remittitur, stare decisis, and preclusion can all fairly be characterized …
Addressing The Incoherency Of The Preemption Provision Of The Copyright Act Of 1976, Joseph P. Bauer
Addressing The Incoherency Of The Preemption Provision Of The Copyright Act Of 1976, Joseph P. Bauer
Journal Articles
Section 301 of the Copyright Act of 1976 expressly preempts state law actions that are within the "general scope of copyright" and that assert claims that are "equivalent to" the rights conferred by the Act. The Act eliminated the previous system of common law copyright for unpublished works, which had prevailed under the prior 1909 Copyright Act. By federalizing copyright law, the drafters of the statute sought to achieve uniformity and to avoid the potential for state protection of infinite duration.
The legislative history of § 301 stated that this preemption provision was set forth "in the clearest and most …
A Theory Of Federal Common Law, Jay Tidmarsh
A Theory Of Federal Common Law, Jay Tidmarsh
Journal Articles
Federal common law is a puzzle. Despite Erie's declaration that "[t]here is no federal general common law,"' well-established and stable pockets of federal common law persist in several areas: cases affecting the rights and obligations of the United States,2 disputes between states, 3 cases affecting international relations,4 and admiralty.5 If anything, federal common law is expanding. Eighteen years ago, a case in which state law was in "significant conflict" with "uniquely federal interests" provided an occasion for the Supreme Court to create another form of federal common law.6 Five years ago, the Court added yet another piece to the puzzle, …
Shopping For Law In A Coasean Market, G. Marcus Cole
Shopping For Law In A Coasean Market, G. Marcus Cole
Journal Articles
In the twentieth century, two Nobel-Prize winning economists wrote two seemingly unrelated characterizations of the processes constraining human behavior. One, Ronald Coase, wrote a short article entitled The Nature of the Firm,1 in which he reduced all managerial decision-making to a fundamental choice between making the factors of production, or buying them. This article and the idea of the "make or buy" decision for which it has come to be known, have proven to be among the most seminal in the history of financial economics and organizational behavior.
The second economist, Friedrich Hayek, wrote what he thought to be a …
State Courts And The Making Of Federal Common Law, Anthony J. Bellia
State Courts And The Making Of Federal Common Law, Anthony J. Bellia
Journal Articles
The authority of federal courts to make federal common law has been a controversial question for courts and scholars. Several scholars have propounded theories addressing primarily whether and when federal courts are justified in making federal common law. It is a little-noticed phenomenon that state courts, too, make federal common law. This Article brings to light the fact that state courts routinely make federal common law in as real a sense as federal courts make it. It further explains that theories that focus on whether the making of federal common law by federal courts is justified are inadequate to explain …
The Erie Doctrine Revisited: How A Conflicts Perspective Can Aid The Analysis, Joseph P. Bauer
The Erie Doctrine Revisited: How A Conflicts Perspective Can Aid The Analysis, Joseph P. Bauer
Journal Articles
I have taught Civil Procedure for the past twenty-five years. Having returned to teaching Conflict of Laws last year, after not having taught that course since the mid-1980s, I was interested in re-examining the Erie doctrine from the vantage point of both of these subject areas. My goal was to see whether a combination of learning from these two related disciplines would introduce additional coherence into the analysis of this topic.
In one sense, the Erie doctrine and traditional choice of law determinations present analogous questions, since they both involve making a selection between competing legal rules. Choice of law …
Abortion—Whose Decision?, Geoffrey J. Bennett, Christina M. Lyon
Abortion—Whose Decision?, Geoffrey J. Bennett, Christina M. Lyon
Journal Articles
Major Points
- The decision in Paton v. Trustees of B.P.A.S.
- Does a husband's "veto power" exist in English Law?
- The rights of the Foetus in English Law
- The rights of the "illegitimate father"
- The American position
- Some reflections
A Suggestion For The Renewal Of The Canon Law, Robert E. Rodes
A Suggestion For The Renewal Of The Canon Law, Robert E. Rodes
Journal Articles
Among the recommendations adopted by the Canon Law Society of America at its last annual meeting was one for bringing the insights of legal traditions besides the Roman to bear on the canonical system. The following suggestions are derived from the insights of my tradition, the common law tradition. That aspect of the common law tradition that I believe has most to contribute to the development of the canon law is concerned not so much with the particular rules of law as with the basic techniques of legal analysis. The common law tradition of legal analysis, as it has been …
Affidavits And Notice Under Ohio Mechanics' Lien Statute, Joseph O'Meara
Affidavits And Notice Under Ohio Mechanics' Lien Statute, Joseph O'Meara
Journal Articles
Recent cases under the Ohio Mechanics' Lien Statute have tended to emphasize the existing confusion in the perfecting of mechanics' liens and the need for statutory revision. The scintilla rule should be abandoned. Nor should the doctrine of stare decisis call up misgivings.
Supreme Court Opinion Contradicting The Scintilla Rule, Joseph O'Meara
Supreme Court Opinion Contradicting The Scintilla Rule, Joseph O'Meara
Journal Articles
The opinion of the supreme court in Cleveland Railway Co. v. Kukucz' cannot logically co-exist with the scintilla rule and, therefore, imperatively requires a re-examination of that trouble- some doctrine and a deliberate choice between it and the case referred to. The scintilla rule should be abandoned.
The Scintilla Rule, Joseph O'Meara
The Scintilla Rule, Joseph O'Meara
Journal Articles
The language quoted from Jacob Laub Baking Company v. Middleton, in which all concurred, will undoubtedly tend to increase the number of directed verdicts and appears to be, in effect, a repudiation of the scintilla rule. The problem, therefore, is to devise a formula which, while meeting the objections to the scintilla rule, will put the judge on notice that a greater degree of assurance is required to direct a verdict than to set one aside. Holding that the conclusion is against.the plaintiff beyond a reasonable doubt is not inconsistent with recognizing that there is "some evidence, however slight". The …