Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Albonico V. Madera Irrigation Dist. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Albonico V. Madera Irrigation Dist. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The land of property owners was entitled to its fair portion of water distributed by a county irrigation district for irrigation purposes where an excess land provision in the district's contract with the United States was improperly included.
Madera Irrigation Dist. V. All Persons [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Madera Irrigation Dist. V. All Persons [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Landowners in a water district did not obtain a vested right appurtenant to their lands, entitling them to the benefits of an irrigation district, just by applying for the appropriation of water for public use, without perfecting that right.
Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. V. All Parties & Persons [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. V. All Parties & Persons [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A state held water in trust for the benefit of the water users in an irrigation district, and was therefore not entitled to discriminate among landowners based solely upon the amount of land that they owned.