Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

Golden Gate University School of Law

1957

Evidence

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

People V. Granados [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Dec 1957

People V. Granados [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Defendant was entitled to modification of his conviction of first degree murder to second degree murder because no competent evidence established that he engaged in sexual molestation of a child under the age of 14.


People V. Craig, Jesse W. Carter Nov 1957

People V. Craig, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Without a showing of premeditation or a showing that a murder was committed in an attempt to commit rape, a first degree murder conviction should have been a second degree murder conviction for the killing of the female victim by defendant.


Daggett V. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., Jesse W. Carter Jul 1957

Daggett V. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Where impeachment evidence regarding the safe speed for operating a train was admissible and railway failed to request a limiting instruction, husband properly recovered for the loss of his wife and two minor children after a collision.


People V. Duroncelay [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jun 1957

People V. Duroncelay [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Defendant's rights were not violated and results of the alcohol test were properly admitted in evidence in trial for driving under the influence of alcohol when extraction was made in a medically approved manner and was incident to the lawful arrest.


People V. Moore [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter May 1957

People V. Moore [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence showed that the killing occurred in the course of an attempted rape.


People V. Hardenbrook, Jesse W. Carter Apr 1957

People V. Hardenbrook, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

The prior consistent statement of a witness was properly admitted to refute an inference of recent fabrication of the testimony. A lay witness was not competent to testify as to defendant's ability to commit premeditated murder.