Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Looking Backward To Move Forward: Ending The "History And Tradition" Of Gun Violence Against The Lgbtq+ Community, Brett V. Ries
Looking Backward To Move Forward: Ending The "History And Tradition" Of Gun Violence Against The Lgbtq+ Community, Brett V. Ries
Duke Law Journal Online
Anti-LGBTQ+ gun violence is occurring in the United States at an alarming rate. The Department of Homeland Security has even issued a domestic terrorism warning for attacks against the LGBTQ+ community. When the shootings at the Pulse Nightclub in Florida and Club Q in Colorado are combined, fifty-four individuals were murdered and seventy-eight more were wounded while simply existing in an LGBTQ+ space. Both of these targeted shootings occurred within the past six years, indicating that anti-LGBTQ+ gun violence is not a relic of the past. As they were ten years ago, LGBTQ+ individuals are still disproportionately impacted by hate …
All Grown Up: Qualified Immunity, Student Rights, And The Way Forward, Matthew Mcknight, Angela Guo
All Grown Up: Qualified Immunity, Student Rights, And The Way Forward, Matthew Mcknight, Angela Guo
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
101 Lawyers: Attorney Appearances In Twitter V. Musk, Andrew K. Jennings
101 Lawyers: Attorney Appearances In Twitter V. Musk, Andrew K. Jennings
Duke Law Journal Online
In summer 2022, Twitter sued Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, in Delaware’s Court of Chancery over his refusal to close his agreed-to $44 billion acquisition of the social-media company. Twitter v. Musk had the makings of corporate law’s trial of the century. Leading law firms represented Twitter, Musk, and third parties in a dispute with enormous financial, social, and political implications. In the lead up to trial, however, Musk relented and closed the deal. The corporate trial of the century was a bust, over almost as soon as it began.
But in the meantime, in Twitter’s eighty-six days of …
Inside The Internet, Nick Merrill, Tejas N. Narechania
Inside The Internet, Nick Merrill, Tejas N. Narechania
Duke Law Journal Online
Conventional wisdom—particularly in the legal literatures—suggests that competition reigns the inside of the internet. This common understanding has shaped regulatory approaches to questions of network security and competition policy among service providers. But the original research presented here undermines that long-held assumption. Where the markets for internet traffic exchange (and related services) have long been thought to be characterized by robust competition among various network services providers, our findings suggest that these markets have consolidated. These trends raise a host of concerns for network reliability, online speech, and consumer choice, among other matters. Indeed, some recent high-profile internet outages reflect …
Creditors Strike Back: The Return Of The Cooperation Agreement, Samir D. Parikh
Creditors Strike Back: The Return Of The Cooperation Agreement, Samir D. Parikh
Duke Law Journal Online
In the low interest rate environment that followed the Great Recession, a fanatical demand for high-yield investments provided private equity firms an opportunity. Newfound borrower leverage facilitated credit documents with few creditor safeguards and various loopholes. Borrowers subject to these “sponsor-favorable” terms now had options in times of financial distress. More specifically, they had the option to strike first.
Utilization of coercive exchanges began in earnest around 2015 and has since flourished. Unmonitored portfolio companies experiencing financial distress now regularly rely on questionable interpretations of ambiguous contractual provisions to surreptitiously move assets away from creditors’ collateral baskets and subordinate lenders. …
Gonzalez V. Google: The Case For Protecting "Targeted Recommendations", Tomer Kenneth, Ira Rubinstein
Gonzalez V. Google: The Case For Protecting "Targeted Recommendations", Tomer Kenneth, Ira Rubinstein
Duke Law Journal Online
Does Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protect online platforms (e.g., Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter) when they use recommendation algorithms? Lower courts upheld platforms’ immunity, notwithstanding notable dissenting opinions. The Supreme Court considers this question in Gonzalez v Google, LLC. Plaintiffs invite the Court to analyze “targeted recommendations” generically and to revoke Section 230 immunity for all recommended content. We think this would be a mistake.
This Article contributes to existing scholarship about Section 230 and online speech governance by adding much needed clarity to the desirable—and undesirable—regulation of recommendation algorithms. Specifically, this Article explains the technology behind algorithmic …
Tax Intelligence, Kathleen Claussen
Tax Intelligence, Kathleen Claussen
Duke Law Journal Online
At the start of 2023, tax policymakers are increasingly contemplating how tax law and policy could bolster U.S. foreign policy goals. The most recent proposals seek to leverage information gathered from tax reporting—what this Essay calls “tax intelligence.” However, front and center in considering how tax intelligence can be used to make foreign policy is a challenge: how that information can make its way through the grinder of our foreign commerce bureaucracy in furtherance of productive outcomes. To address this challenge and amplify the promise of these proposals, this Essay offers four contributions. First, it demonstrates that these proposals make …
Murder And Money: The Dark Side Of Taylor Swift, Fredrick E. Vars
Murder And Money: The Dark Side Of Taylor Swift, Fredrick E. Vars
Duke Law Journal Online
Under the dramatically named “Slayer Rule,” murderers cannot inherit from their victims. This principle is so intuitive that it is easy to miss critical questions of implementation. One such question is: What if one cannot prove the murder with certainty? Should the Slayer Rule apply only to individuals convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of murder, or should some lower level of proof suffice? This essay examines those questions through an unlikely lens: the music of Taylor Swift.
Misreading Campbell: Lessons From Warhol, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Misreading Campbell: Lessons From Warhol, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Duke Law Journal Online
In Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF) v. Goldsmith, the Supreme Court is set to revisit its most salient fair use precedent that introduced the idea of a "transformative use." Purporting to rely on the Court’s adoption of "transformative use" as a way of understanding the fair use doctrine in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., many lower courts, including the district court below, have effectively substituted an amorphous "transformativeness" inquiry for the full statutory framework and factors that Congress and Campbell prescribe. At the oral argument in AWF, the Justices focused on how the transformativeness of a work might be considered as …