Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0941: Duck Creek Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2016-452 (Temporary Authorization; Mogadore Facility)

Appeal No. 0943: Mario V. D/Amico V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2017-94

Appeal No. 0932: Steven Passerell V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Michael D. Hobbs, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2016-304 (H&R Smith Unit #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0926: Goerge Jr. & Karen L. Dudich V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources & Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2016-118; Troyer W LND DR Unit (Ascent Resources - Utica)

Appeal No. 0935: B&N, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2016-346; (Weddle Wiley #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0912: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2014-471 (Gulfport Energy Corporation; Brown #9 Unit)

Appeal No. 0862: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2014-46 & 2016-16 (Unitzation Order & Revocation Order; Huffman Trust South Unit; Chsepeake Exploration, LLC)

Appeal No. 0928: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 2014-46 & 2016-16 (Unitzation Order & Revocation Order; Huffman Trust South Unit; Chsepeake Exploration, LLC)

Appeal No. 0927: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2016-158 (modifying Chief's Order 2016-121); M-I SWACO Facility

Appeal No. 0931: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Termination Letter; Strasburg Facility

Appeal No. 0936: Coddingville Reality Ltd, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2016-368 (Liability Insurance)

Appeal No. 0929: Duck Creek Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2016-162; (Cessation of Operations; Mogadore Facility)

Appeal No. 0940: Riverside Petroleum & Production, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2016-420

Appeal No. 0909: Dow Cameron Oil & Gas, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2015-413; Dow Cameron Facility

Appeal No. 0908: Dover-Atwood Corporation V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2015-416; Shirley et al Unit #3 Well

Big Data And The Americans With Disabilities Act, Sharona Hoffman

Faculty Publications

While big data offers society many potential benefits, it also comes with serious risks. This Essay focuses on the concern that big data will lead to increased employment discrimination. It develops the novel argument that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) should be amended in response to the big data phenomenon in order to protect individuals who are perceived as likely to develop physical or mental impairments in the future. Employers can obtain medical data about employees not only through the traditional means of medical examinations and inquiries, but also through the non-traditional mechanisms of social media, wellness programs, and …

Busting Up The Pretrial Industry, Andrew S. Pollis

Faculty Publications

It is by now axiomatic that the objective of the civil lawsuit has evolved. Litigants no longer routinely resolve their disputes through trial but instead engage in pretrial battles designed to extract favorable settlements. Modern litigation revolves around protracted discovery and dispositive motions, driven by two primary dynamics: (1) the maximization of fees for lawyers who charge their clients by the hour; and (2) the desire to make litigation as painful as possible for an adversary so that settlement becomes the adversary’s better option. We have, in short, fostered a pretrial industry that can relegate the merits of a dispute …

What We Buy When We "Buy Now", Aaron K. Perzanowski, Chris Jay Hoofnagle

Faculty Publications

Retailers such as Apple and Amazon market digital media to consumers using the familiar language of product ownership, including phrases like “buy now,” “own,” and “purchase.” Consumers may understandably associate such language with strong personal property rights. But the license agreements and terms of use associated with these transactions tell a different story. They explain that ebooks, mp3 albums, digital movies, games, and software are not sold, but merely licensed. The terms limit consumers' ability to resell, lend, transfer, and even retain possession of the digital media they acquire. Moreover, unlike physical media products, access to digital media is contingent …

Selling Stock And Selling Legal Claims: Alienability As A Constraint On Managerial Opportunism, Charles R. Korsmo

Faculty Publications

Scholars have long recognized the importance of market forces as a tool for disciplining the management of public corporations and reducing agency costs. If managers loot or otherwise mismanage the firm, the firm’s stock price will suffer, raising its cost of capital and leaving managers exposed to the threat of a hostile takeover. In recent decades, changing patterns of stock ownership have threatened the viability of this market check on mismanagement. Institutional investors, and particularly index funds, own an increasing portion of publicly traded firms, and face substantial liquidity and other barriers to simply selling their positions. To the extent …

Do International Criminal Tribunals Have A Deterrent Effect On Human Rights Abuses?, Rachel Lehr

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Standard Of Review For Evaluating Post-Conviction Requests For Review, Morgan E. Austin

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

The Legal Authority Of Ice Breaking On The Great Lakes Between The United States Coast Guard And The Canadian Coast Guard, The Implications Of The Ice Breaking Services Fee By The Ccg, And The Potential Liability Of Canadian Criminal Code Section 263 On The Uscg, Jason Edward Stafford

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

The Level Of Proof Required To Indict A Person And Send Them To Trial At The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia Specifically Addressing The Levels Of Proof To Indict A Person Of France And Other International Criminal Courts, Also Analysing The Statutes, Documents And Jurispurdiction Of The Eccc To Draw A Conclusion, Xiong Shi

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Convert Or Die Policies As A Form Of Mental Harm Genocide Specifically Addressing The Argument That Convert Or Die Policies Are Acts Committed In Whole Or In Part To Destroy A Religious Group By Causing Mental Harm To Members Of The Religious Group., Ananya Mallavarapu

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

In International Criminal Law Does The Prosecutor Have A Responsibility To Ensure That The Facts Forming The Historical Context In Which Large-Scale Human Rights Abuses Occurred Are Adjudicated At Trial? Why Or Why Not?, Tyler Portner

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Is The Eccc’S Supreme Court Chamber’S Conception Of A Common Criminal Plan In The Case 002/01 Appeal Judgment Supported By Customary International Law? Specifically Addressing The Arguments Surrounding The Supreme Court Chamber’S Rejection Of The Existence Of Jce3 And Whether Post World War Ii Jurisprudence Establishes The Existence Of Jce3 In Customary International Law., Jordan Elizabeth Dinsmore

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Whether The Adoption Of Civil Criminal Justice System As Opposed To The Common Law Criminal Justice System In Eccc Is A Correct Decision. Specifically Addressing The Pros And Cons Of Both Legal Systems, Lulu Jing

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

What Would Be The Legal And Political Ramifications If The Un Decided To Stop Funding The Eccc Prior To The Current Investigations And Trials Being Finalized? Assess The Ramifications In The Cambodian And International Context., Stephanie M. Farah

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Modes Of Liability, Cumulative Convictions, And Charging Language, Ankita Channarasappa

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Invisible Error, Cassandra Burke Robertson

Faculty Publications

When trial becomes a luxury, retrial can start to look downright decadent. Scholars have documented the “vanishing trial” in recent decades, exploring the various causes and effects of declining trial rates. Retrial, if mentioned at all, is portrayed as a relatively inefficient vehicle for error correction at best. At worst, it is seen as a threat to the sanctity of the ever-rarer jury verdict.

But the jury trial is only endangered, not yet extinct. And continuing to protect the constitutional right to a jury requires appreciating the role of retrial within the due-process framework. When the jury’s verdict contradicts the …