Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dawn Of The Intercontinental Sniper: The Drone's Cascading Contribution To The Modern Battlefield's Complexity: A Re-View Essay Of Predator: The Secret Origins Of The Drone Revolution, By Richard Whittle, Steven L. Schooner, Nathaniel E. Castellano
Dawn Of The Intercontinental Sniper: The Drone's Cascading Contribution To The Modern Battlefield's Complexity: A Re-View Essay Of Predator: The Secret Origins Of The Drone Revolution, By Richard Whittle, Steven L. Schooner, Nathaniel E. Castellano
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This review essay discusses a unique book that chronicles the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) or "drone" revolution with a focus on the Predator weapon system. Although brought to market by a mainstream publisher, the book offers a thought-provoking, heavily researched, non-fiction case study involving national security, defense acquisition, and international law. We congratulate author Richard Whittle for crafting a thrilling and highly informative history of technological innovation, government contracting, and weapons system development and deployment, while introducing complex issues of national security and international law, that nonetheless left us eagerly anticipating a forthcoming action movie.
This review essay introduces prospective …
Eyes On The Prize, Head In The Sand: Filling The Due Process Vacuum In Federally Administered Contests, Steven L. Schooner, Nathaniel E. Castellano
Eyes On The Prize, Head In The Sand: Filling The Due Process Vacuum In Federally Administered Contests, Steven L. Schooner, Nathaniel E. Castellano
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
The article introduces readers to the recent proliferation of federal prize contests, which sovereigns have employed, albeit sporadically, since the mid-sixteenth century to incentivize breakthrough innovation. In the past decade, the federal government’s use of prize contests has skyrocketed, which makes sense in an era of constrained government resources. Prize contests offer seemingly unlimited potential to break through existing technological barriers at less expense than traditional innovation incentivizing tools such as contracts, grants, and patents. But that upside potential comes at a cost.
For every ebullient prizewinner, there are potentially innumerable “losers,” many of whom feel wronged, exploited, or, at …