Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

PDF

George Washington University Law School

2015

117 F.3d 1044 (7th Circ. 1997) and a simple hypothetical

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Law

Authentication And Hearsay: Which Trumps?, Stephen A. Saltzburg Jan 2015

Authentication And Hearsay: Which Trumps?, Stephen A. Saltzburg

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(b) and which standards a trial judge should apply in admitting hearsay evidence when its authentication is in question. Focusing on United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044 (7th Circ. 1997) and a simple hypothetical, the article concludes that evidence must be authenticated under Rule 104(b) as well as satisfying the hearsay rule and Rule 104(a).