Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 9th Amendment. Ninth Amendment (1)
- Asylum (1)
- Bible (1)
- China (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Eileen Kaufman (1)
- Firm Resettlement (1)
- Government policies (1)
- Hermeneutic (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- India (1)
- Jewish law (1)
- Kaufman (1)
- Levine (1)
- Michael Lewyn (1)
- Political Asylum (1)
- Population densities (1)
- Refugee Law (1)
- Refugees (1)
- Rule of Exclusion (1)
- Samuel Levine (1)
- Sprawl (1)
- Sprawl in Europe And America (1)
- Tibet (1)
- Tibetan refugee (1)
- Tibetans (1)
- Torah (1)
- United States (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sprawl In Europe And America, Michael Lewyn
Sprawl In Europe And America, Michael Lewyn
Scholarly Works
Defenders of suburban sprawl assert that sprawl is inevitable in affluent societies, based on trends in Western Europe. According to supporters of this Inevitability Theory, European cities have decentralized and become more car-dependent, thus proving that even where governments are more aggressively anti-sprawl than American government, anti-sprawl policies will be futile.
This Article compares Western Europe to the United States, and criticizes the Inevitabilty Theory on the grounds that:
(1) Europe is in fact far less automobile-dependent than the United States;
(2) Europe has not, contrary to the Inevitability Theory's claims, become more car-dependent and suburbanized in recent years; and …
Shelter From The Storm: An Analysis Of U.S. Refugee Law As Applied To Tibetans Formerly Residing In India, Eileen Kaufman
Shelter From The Storm: An Analysis Of U.S. Refugee Law As Applied To Tibetans Formerly Residing In India, Eileen Kaufman
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Of Inkblots And Omnisignificance: Conceptualizing Secondary And Symbolic Functions Of The Ninth Amendment, In A Comparative Hermeneutic Framework, Samuel J. Levine
Of Inkblots And Omnisignificance: Conceptualizing Secondary And Symbolic Functions Of The Ninth Amendment, In A Comparative Hermeneutic Framework, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
In this Essay, Levine focuses on a particular hermeneutic approach common to the interpretation of the Torah and the United States Constitution: a presumption against superfluity. This presumption accords to the text a considerable degree of omnisignificance, requiring that interpreters pay careful attention to every textual phrase and nuance in an effort to find its legal meaning and implications. In light of this presumption, it might be expected that normative interpretation of both the Torah and the Constitution would preclude a methodology that allows sections of the text to remain bereft of concrete legal application. In fact, however, both the …