Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (3)
- Contracts (2)
- Copyright Act (2)
- Higher education (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
-
- Intellectual property law (2)
- Librarianship (2)
- 11th circuit (1)
- Agreements (1)
- Annotations (1)
- Apparel (1)
- Art (1)
- Artistic features (1)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (1)
- Citation study (1)
- Derivative works (1)
- Design (1)
- EReserves (1)
- Fair use (1)
- Fashion (1)
- Graphical works (1)
- Industrial design (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Licensing agreement (1)
- Mazer v. Stein (1)
- Network analysis (1)
- Patent law (1)
- Patents (1)
- Pictorial works (1)
- Protected works (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Essentials Of A Publication Agreement, Stephen Wolfson, Mariann Burright
Essentials Of A Publication Agreement, Stephen Wolfson, Mariann Burright
Presentations
This session will focus on authors' rights and publishing contracts. When academic publishers agree to publish academic works, they require the authors to sign agreements before doing so. In the past, these “agreements” – contracts, by another name – often have contained provisions that primarily benefit the publishers, including assigning intellectual property rights in the works to the publishers and limiting authors’ abilities to use their works after transferring their rights. Faculty authors often ask librarians for their guidance on how to read and negotiate publication agreements. As such, this session will discuss common provisions found in publishing contracts to …
What's In A Licensing Agreement?, Stephen Wolfson, Mariann Burright
What's In A Licensing Agreement?, Stephen Wolfson, Mariann Burright
Presentations
Now that you know the foundations of enforceable contracts, and want to have more familiarity with some nuts and bolts of contract language to become a better negotiator for your institutions, you will want to take this second webinar.
Participants will learn:
• What are the basic provisions or clauses of a contract?
• What do these provisions obligate my institution to do?
• What do these provisions obligate the other party to do?
• What rights does my institution have if the other party breaks its obligations?
Ereserves, Annotations, And Registration: Copyright At The 11th Circuit, Stephen Wolfson
Ereserves, Annotations, And Registration: Copyright At The 11th Circuit, Stephen Wolfson
Presentations
This presentation discusses eReserves, the 11th circuit and copyright issues surrounding the Georgia State University case heard by Judge Evans in 2008.
All For Copyright Stand Up And Holler! Three Cheers For Star Athletica And The U.S. Supreme Court’S Perceived And Imagined Separately Test, David E. Shipley
All For Copyright Stand Up And Holler! Three Cheers For Star Athletica And The U.S. Supreme Court’S Perceived And Imagined Separately Test, David E. Shipley
Scholarly Works
In March 2017 the United States Supreme Court held in Star Athletica L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands Inc. that an artistic feature incorporated into the design of a useful article could be protected by copyright when that feature could be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article, and imagined separately as a protectable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work. This two-part test replaces a variety of tests which courts and commentators proposed and applied during the last 40 years. The Star Athletica decision is predicted to be a boon to the fashion and apparel industry, …
A Transformative Use Taxonomy: Making Sense Of The Transformative Use Standard, David E. Shipley
A Transformative Use Taxonomy: Making Sense Of The Transformative Use Standard, David E. Shipley
Scholarly Works
The transformative use standard, which is an important aspect of copyright law’s fair use doctrine, has been confusing and uncertain since 1994 when it was first introduced by the United States Supreme Court in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music. To try to make some sense of this standard, this article extends the work of several scholars who have argued that the massive amount of fair use case law generally divides itself into categories, patterns or policy clusters which have their own internal coherence. This article contends that these observations apply as well to transformative use decisions more particularly, which similarly fit …
Charting Supreme Court Patent Law, Near And Far, Joseph S. Miller
Charting Supreme Court Patent Law, Near And Far, Joseph S. Miller
Scholarly Works
The Supreme Court has been markedly more active in patent law in recent years, as many have noted. How much has patent law changed as a result? The amount of change one sees is, in important respects, a function of the lens through which one looks. In this network analysis of the Supreme Court’s citations to its own case law in all its intellectual property cases from 1947 to 2017, inclusive, I am reminded of Alphonse Karr’s famous quip: “Plus ça change, plus c’est law mȇme chose” — the more it changes, the more it’s the same thing. I report …