Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Roger Williams University (12)
- Columbia Law School (11)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Linfield University (2)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (2)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Florida International University (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (32)
- Free speech (20)
- Constitutional law (8)
- First amendment (8)
- Privacy (7)
-
- Internet (6)
- Press (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Arguments (5)
- Media (5)
- Social media (5)
- Defamation (4)
- Democracy (4)
- Facebook (4)
- Fake news (4)
- Free Speech (4)
- Free expression (4)
- Government (4)
- Newspapers (4)
- President (4)
- Trump (4)
- "Fake news" (3)
- Advertising (3)
- Conduct (3)
- Constitutional (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Decision (3)
- Freedom of Speech (3)
- Freedom of speech (3)
- Government speech (3)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (22)
- Faculty Publications (10)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Law School Blogs (9)
- Publications (9)
-
- Popular Media (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (5)
- Articles (4)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Other Publications (3)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Center for Gender & Sexuality Law (1)
- Court Briefs (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- GGU Law Review Blog (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (1)
- NULR Online (1)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (1)
- Online Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (1)
- Supreme Court Preview (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 111
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Recognizing The Free Press In The Crosshairs Across The Globe 12-12-2018, David A. Logan
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Recognizing The Free Press In The Crosshairs Across The Globe 12-12-2018, David A. Logan
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
The Esquire Case: A Lost Free Speech Landmark, Samantha Barbas
The Esquire Case: A Lost Free Speech Landmark, Samantha Barbas
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
How Supreme A Court?, Thomas E. Kadri
How Supreme A Court?, Thomas E. Kadri
Popular Media
Facebook is planning an independent appeals process for content moderation decisions. But how much power will it have?
How To Make Facebook's 'Supreme Court' Work, Kate Klonick, Thomas E. Kadri
How To Make Facebook's 'Supreme Court' Work, Kate Klonick, Thomas E. Kadri
Popular Media
The idea of a body that will decide what kind of content is allowed on the site is promising — but only if it’s done right.
Patin V. Lee, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 87 (Nov. 15, 2018) (En Banc), Haley Jaramillo
Patin V. Lee, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 87 (Nov. 15, 2018) (En Banc), Haley Jaramillo
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court held that a statement by an attorney on her firm’s website summarizing a jury’s verdict is not a statement in direct connection with an issue under consideration by a judicial body. The Court explained that because the statement is not a “good faith communication in furtherance of the right . . . to free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern,” it would not receive anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) protection under NRS § 41.660(1).
Restoring The Establishment Clause To The States; Restoring Religious Tolerance, Golden Gate University Law Review
Restoring The Establishment Clause To The States; Restoring Religious Tolerance, Golden Gate University Law Review
GGU Law Review Blog
In recent years, the Supreme Court has recognized the downturn of consistent and reliable Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The inconsistency of opinions and the often hostile outcomes have left the Establishment Clause in “shambles”. Justices have commented that there is no other area of law in more desperate need of repair than the Establishment Clause. One reason posited for the current state of confusion is that the Establishment Clause was never intended to be incorporated. Because of this, even the Supreme Court cannot agree on a single test or even consistently apply the many tests it currently employs.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jenna Wims Hashway's Blog: First Amendment Lets Officials Mute But Not Block Twitter Critics 10/09/2018, Jenna Wims Hashway
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jenna Wims Hashway's Blog: First Amendment Lets Officials Mute But Not Block Twitter Critics 10/09/2018, Jenna Wims Hashway
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Challenging Calls For Civility, Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt
Challenging Calls For Civility, Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt
Faculty Publications
In conjunction with her article "When Free Speech Disrupts Diversity Initiatives: What We Value and What We Do Not," Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt writes about civility codes and free speech for Academe Blog.
Kennedy's Last Term: A Report On The 2017-2018 Supreme Court, Marc O. Degirolami, Kevin C. Walsh
Kennedy's Last Term: A Report On The 2017-2018 Supreme Court, Marc O. Degirolami, Kevin C. Walsh
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
Twenty-eighteen brought the end of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s tenure on the Supreme Court. We are now entering a period of uncertainty about American constitutional law. Will we remain on the trajectory of the last half-century? Or will the Court move in a different direction?
The character of the Supreme Court in closely divided cases is often a function of the median justice. The new median justice will be Chief Justice John Roberts if Kennedy’s replacement is a conservative likely to vote most often with Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito. This will mark a new phase of …
The Law Of Advertising Outrage, Mark Bartholomew
The Law Of Advertising Outrage, Mark Bartholomew
Journal Articles
This article examines the stimulation of audience outrage, both as a marketing strategy and as a subject of legal regulation. A brief history of advertising in the United States reveals repeated yet relatively infrequent attempts to attract consumer attention through overt transgressions of social norms relating to sex, violence, race, and religion. Natural concerns over audience reaction limited use of this particular advertising tactic as businesses needed to be careful not to alienate prospective purchasers. But now companies can engage in “algorithmic outrage”—social media advertising meant to stimulate individual feelings of anger and upset—with less concern for a consumer backlash. …
Section 1: Moot Court: Nieves, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court: Nieves, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Managing Dissent, Timothy Zick
Managing Dissent, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
In his insightful new book, Managed Speech: The Roberts Court's First Amendment (2017), Professor Greg Magarian criticizes the Roberts Court for adopting a "managed speech" approach in its First Amendment cases. According to Professor Magarian, that approach gives too much power to private and governmental actors to manage public discourse, constrain dissident speakers, and instill social and political stability. This Article argues that at least insofar as it relates to many forms of public dissent, the managed speech approach is both deeply rooted in First Amendment jurisprudence and culturally prevalent. Historically, First Amendment jurisprudence has expressed support for narrowly managed …
President Trump: Challenging Core First Amendment Principles, Timothy Zick
President Trump: Challenging Core First Amendment Principles, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David A. Logan's Blog: Infowars Goes To War With The First Amendment 08-15-2018, David A. Logan
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David A. Logan's Blog: Infowars Goes To War With The First Amendment 08-15-2018, David A. Logan
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment, The Second Amendment, And 3d Firearms, Timothy Zick
The First Amendment, The Second Amendment, And 3d Firearms, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Judge Kavanaugh And Freedom Of Expression, Timothy Zick
Judge Kavanaugh And Freedom Of Expression, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Righting A Wrong: Woodrow Wilson, Warren G. Harding, And The Espionage Act Prosecutions, David Forte
Righting A Wrong: Woodrow Wilson, Warren G. Harding, And The Espionage Act Prosecutions, David Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This is a story of excess and reparation. It is a chronicle of one President from the elite intellectual classes of the East, and another from a county seat in the heartland. Woodrow Wilson was the college president whose contribution to the art of government lay in the principle of expertise and efficiency. When he went to war, he turned the machinery of government into a comprehensive and highly effective instrument for victory. For Wilson, it followed that there could be little tolerance for those who impeded the success of American arms by their anti-war propaganda, draft resistance, or ideological …
The Problem Isn't Just Backpage: Revising Section 230 Immunity, Danielle K. Citron, Benjamin Wittes
The Problem Isn't Just Backpage: Revising Section 230 Immunity, Danielle K. Citron, Benjamin Wittes
Faculty Scholarship
Backpage is a classifieds hub that hosts “80 percent of the online advertising for illegal commercial sex in the United States.” This is not by happenstance but rather by design. Evidence suggests that the advertising hub selectively removed postings discouraging sex trafficking. The site also tailored its rules to protect the practice from detection, including allowing anonymized email and photographs stripped of metadata. Under the prevailing interpretation of 47 U.S.C. § 230 (“Section 230”) of the CDA, however, Backpage would be immune from liability connected to sex trafficking even though it proactively helped sex traffickers from getting caught. No matter …
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Michael J. Yelnosky's Blog: Janus V. Afscme And "Weaponizing The First Amendment 06-30-2018, Michael J. Yelnosky
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Michael J. Yelnosky's Blog: Janus V. Afscme And "Weaponizing The First Amendment 06-30-2018, Michael J. Yelnosky
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Discovering Trump 06-22-2018, David A. Logan
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Discovering Trump 06-22-2018, David A. Logan
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jared Goldstein's Blog: Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling: No Constitutional Right To Discriminate (For Now) 06-05-2018, Jared A. Goldstein
Rwu First Amendment Blog: Jared Goldstein's Blog: Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling: No Constitutional Right To Discriminate (For Now) 06-05-2018, Jared A. Goldstein
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Why Did Liberals Join The Majority In The Masterpiece Case?, Katherine A. Shaw
Why Did Liberals Join The Majority In The Masterpiece Case?, Katherine A. Shaw
Online Publications
It was no surprise that Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has cast the decisive vote in so many important Supreme Court cases, wrote Monday’s majority opinion in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker named Jack Phillips who, on religious grounds, had refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.
Cheers To Central Hudson: How Traditional Intermediate Scrutiny Helps Keep Independent Craft Beer Viable, Daniel J. Croxall
Cheers To Central Hudson: How Traditional Intermediate Scrutiny Helps Keep Independent Craft Beer Viable, Daniel J. Croxall
NULR Online
Independent craft breweries contributed approximately $68 billion to the national economy last year. However, an arcane regulatory scheme governs the alcohol industry in general and the craft beer industry specifically, posing both obstacles and benefits to independent craft brewers. This Essay examines regulations that arguably infringe on free speech: namely, commercial speech regulations that prohibit alcohol manufacturers from purchasing advertising space from retailers. Such regulations were enacted to prohibit undue influence and anticompetitive behavior stemming from vertical and horizontal integration in the alcohol market. Although these regulations are necessary to prevent global corporate brewers from dominating the craft beer market …
Brief Of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Law Professors, Mark Mckenna, Rebecca Tushnet, Yvette Joy Liebesman, John A. Conway
Brief Of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Law Professors, Mark Mckenna, Rebecca Tushnet, Yvette Joy Liebesman, John A. Conway
Court Briefs
Untethered to a sufficient public policy interest, right of publicity claims have exploded nationwide. Plaintiffs have asserted claims against inspirational plaques featuring civil rights icons, Rosa and Raymond Parks Inst. for Self Dev. v. Target Corp., 812 F.3d 824 (11th Cir. 2016),artwork commemorating significant events, Moore v. Weinstein Co., LLC, 545 Fed. App’x. 405 , 407 (6th Cir. 2013); ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publ’g, Inc., 332 F.3d 915 (6th Cir. 2003), Wikipedia edits that truthfully connected an astronaut with the watch he wore on his Moon walk, Scott v. Citizen Watch Co. of Am., Inc., 17-CV-00436-NC, 2018 WL 1626773 (N.D. …
We’Ve Come A Long Way (Baby)! Or Have We? Evolving Intellectual Freedom Issues In The Us And Florida, L. Bryan Cooper, A.D. Beman-Cavallaro
We’Ve Come A Long Way (Baby)! Or Have We? Evolving Intellectual Freedom Issues In The Us And Florida, L. Bryan Cooper, A.D. Beman-Cavallaro
Works of the FIU Libraries
This paper analyzes a shifting landscape of intellectual freedom (IF) in and outside Florida for children, adolescents, teens and adults. National ideals stand in tension with local and state developments, as new threats are visible in historical, legal, and technological context. Examples include doctrinal shifts, legislative bills, electronic surveillance and recent attempts to censor books, classroom texts, and reading lists.
Privacy rights for minors in Florida are increasingly unstable. New assertions of parental rights are part of a larger conservative animus. Proponents of IF can identify a lessening of ideals and standards that began after doctrinal fruition in the 1960s …
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Media Centralization Imperils Marketplace Of Ideas 04-05-2018, David A. Logan
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Media Centralization Imperils Marketplace Of Ideas 04-05-2018, David A. Logan
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Law School News: 'Marketplace Of Ideas' Imperiled (04-05-2018), David A. Logan
Law School News: 'Marketplace Of Ideas' Imperiled (04-05-2018), David A. Logan
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Corporate Social Responsibility And Social Media Corporations: Incorporating Human Rights Through Rankings, Self-Regulation And Shareholder Resolutions, Erika George
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
This article examines the emergence and evolution of selected ranking and reporting frameworks in the expanding realm of business and human rights advocacy. It explores how indicators in the form of rankings and reports evaluating the conduct of transnational corporate actors can serve as regulatory tools with potential to bridge a global governance gap that often places human rights at risk. This article examines the relationship of transnational corporations in the Internet communications technology sector (ICT sector) to human rights and the risks presented to the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy when ICT sector companies …
Inciting Terrorism On The Internet: The Limits Of Tolerating Intolerance, Amos N. Guiora
Inciting Terrorism On The Internet: The Limits Of Tolerating Intolerance, Amos N. Guiora
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
The Internet is a limitless platform for information and data sharing. It is, in addition, however, a low-cost, high-speed dissemination mechanism that facilitates the spreading of hate speech, including violent and virtual threats. Indictment and prosecution for social media posts that transgress from opinion to incitable hate speech are appropriate in limited circumstances. Several real-world examples discussed here help to explore when limitations on Internet-based hate speech are appropriate.
In October 2015, twenty thousand Israelis joined a civil lawsuit filed against Facebook in the Supreme Court for the State of New York. Led by the civil rights organization Shurat HaDin, …
Free Speech Hypocrisy: Campus Free Speech Conflicts And The Sub-Legal First Amendment, Christina E. Wells
Free Speech Hypocrisy: Campus Free Speech Conflicts And The Sub-Legal First Amendment, Christina E. Wells
Faculty Publications
This Article is modest in scope. It seeks primarily to illuminate the role of free speech conflicts, especially those involving contentious speech, within the Court's jurisprudence, and to illustrate how arguments characterizing the protestors' speech as censorship misperceive the important role such conflicts play. Using both the Court's doctrinal framework and conflict resolution literature, this article attempts to bring deeper understanding to the purposes for the Court's approach, the context underlying the current conflicts, and the flaws underlying the argument that the protestors' actions are censorial. Part I briefly reviews three illustrative free speech conflicts at the University of Missouri, …