Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Domestic relations (3)
- Family law (2)
- Family responsibility (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Bigotry (1)
-
- Child protection (1)
- Child welfare (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Columbia Law Review (1)
- Conscience (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Due process of law (1)
- Emigration and immigration--Government policy (1)
- Exemptions (1)
- Family court (1)
- Fordham Law Review Online (1)
- Human relationships (1)
- Intimate partner violence (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Juvenile delinquency (1)
- Juvenile justice (1)
- Juvenile sentencing (1)
- LGBT rights (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Marriage equality (1)
- Marriage law (1)
- Nonmarital families (1)
- Parent and child (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Rhetoric Of Bigotry And Conscience In Battles Over "Religious Liberty V. Lgbt Rights", Linda C. Mcclain
The Rhetoric Of Bigotry And Conscience In Battles Over "Religious Liberty V. Lgbt Rights", Linda C. Mcclain
Faculty Scholarship
Charges, denials, and countercharges of “bigotry” are a familiar feature in debates over the evident conflict between LGBT rights and religious liberty. A frequent claim is that religious individuals who reject the extension of civil marriage to same-sex couples and seek conscience-based exemptions from state public accommodations law that protect against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation are being “branded” as bigots. The rhetoric of bigotry raises a number of puzzles. Is sincerity or the appeal to conscience a defense to charge of bigotry? Is a charge of bigotry inferred simply from asserting that society should learn lessons from …
The Rights Of Marriage: Obergefell, Din, And The Future Of Constitutional Family Law, Kerry Abrams
The Rights Of Marriage: Obergefell, Din, And The Future Of Constitutional Family Law, Kerry Abrams
Faculty Scholarship
In the summer of 2015 the United States Supreme Court handed down two groundbreaking constitutional family law decisions. One decision became famous overnight Obergefell v. Hodges declared that same-sex couples have the constitutional right to marry. The other, Kerry v. Din, went largely overlooked. That later case concerned not the right to marry but the rights of marriage. In particular, it asked whether a person has a constitutional liberty interest in living with his or her spouse. This case is suddenly of paramount importance: executive orders targeting particular groups of immigrants implicate directly this right to family reunification.
This Article …
No More Blood, Kerry Abrams
Family Law's Exclusions, Clare Huntington
Family Law's Exclusions, Clare Huntington
Faculty Scholarship
As Fordham Law School commemorates the hundredth anniversary of women in its ranks, the school is also acknowledging the ways it has excluded women. For this special Issue celebrating scholarship by the women of Fordham, I see a similar theme echoing in my work. From my first article, published soon after I graduated from law school, through my most recent work, I have identified and explored the exclusions riddling family law.
The Empirical Turn In Family Law, Clare Huntington
The Empirical Turn In Family Law, Clare Huntington
Faculty Scholarship
Historically, the legal system justified family law’s rules and policies through morality, common sense, and prevailing cultural norms. In a sharp departure, and consistent with a broader trend across the legal system, empirical evidence increasingly dominates the regulation of families.
There is much to celebrate in this empirical turn. Properly used, empirical evidence in family law can help the state act more effectively and efficiently, unmask prejudice, and depoliticize contentious battles. But the empirical turn also presents substantial concerns. Beyond perennial issues of the quality of empirical evidence and the ability of legal actors to use it, there are more …
Rethinking Family-Court Prosecutors: Elected And Agency Prosecutors And Prosecutorial Discretion In Juvenile Delinquency And Child Protection Cases, Joshua Gupta-Kagan
Rethinking Family-Court Prosecutors: Elected And Agency Prosecutors And Prosecutorial Discretion In Juvenile Delinquency And Child Protection Cases, Joshua Gupta-Kagan
Faculty Scholarship
Like criminal prosecutors, family-court prosecutors have immense power. Determining which cases to prosecute and which to divert or dismiss goes to the heart of the delinquency system’s balance between punishment and rehabilitation of children and the child protection system’s spectrum of family interventions. For instance, the 1990s shift to prosecute (rather than dismiss or divert) about 10 percent more delinquency cases annually is as significant a development as any other. Yet scholars have not examined the legal structures for these charging decisions or family-court prosecutors’ authority in much depth.
This Article shows how family-court prosecutors’ roles have never been fully …