Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Evidence (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (2)
- Self Incrimination (2)
- Adversary (1)
-
- Canada Evidence Act Section 12 (1)
- Canada's Evidence Code (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal intent (1)
- Curriculum (1)
- Evidence (Law) (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Jury decision making (1)
- Jury deliberation (1)
- Law professors (1)
- Law schools (1)
- Law students (1)
- Lawyering skills (1)
- Liberalization (1)
- Procedure (Law) (1)
- Simulated juries (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Technology (1)
- Trial practice (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
An Evidence Code: The American Experience, Paul F. Rothstein
An Evidence Code: The American Experience, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professor Paul Rothstien's opening address at the Conference on Current Trends in Evidence, Dalhousie University, 26th November 1976.
Rothstein discusses the American Evidence Code, the American experience with it, and compares it to a proposed Code that Canada is considering.
The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer
The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
This Article explores the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in Georgia criminal cases prior to 1961 and during the post-Mapp era and endeavors to assess the future admissibility of illegally seized evidence in Georgia under both federal and state law.
Claiming Illegal Electronic Surveillance: An Examination Of 18 U.S.C. 3504(A)(1), Margaret V. Sachs
Claiming Illegal Electronic Surveillance: An Examination Of 18 U.S.C. 3504(A)(1), Margaret V. Sachs
Scholarly Works
This Comment will first discuss the making of claims under section 3504(a)(1), and will show that the statute should not be read to require that claims be accompanied by evidentiary support. It will then suggest that the statute should be read to encompass claims of attorney-third party conversations. Finally, the scope of the government's response to section 3504(a)(I) claims will be examined.
Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer
Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In the past, there have been three major approaches to the experimental investigation of the jury. First, juror selection research involves the study of the relation between verdicts or leniency toward certain classes of defendants and the characteristics of potential jurors. The second class of research is group study, in which the amount and style of individual participation is observed within the context of simulated jury deliberations (e.g., Strodtbeck, James and Hawkins, 1957). Finally, experimental psychology has made another contribution to the study of the jury; numerous researchers have conducted experimental studies employing legal stimulus materials. Typically, in such a …
Evidence: Prior Crimes And Prior Bad Acts Evidence, Paul W. Grimm
Evidence: Prior Crimes And Prior Bad Acts Evidence, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Technical And Scientific Evidence In Administrative Adjudication, Scott C. Whitney
Technical And Scientific Evidence In Administrative Adjudication, Scott C. Whitney
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Bad News And Good News, John W. Reed
Bad News And Good News, John W. Reed
Articles
I have been asked to visit with you about some of my current interests in the evidence field, in which I teach. When you invite an academic lawyer to speak at your meeting, you obviously expect of him something other than the latest hot tips on trial strategy and tactics, something other than a speech entitled "Reflections on My Last Eleven Victories in Court." Others can do that for you, probably at lunch - or, even better, at cocktails with the successes more impressive and the defeats more forgivable under the influence of an ounce or two of alcohol.