Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Evidence law (3)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Intoxication (2)
- Admissibility of evidence (1)
-
- Bills of Particulars (1)
- Blood tests (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- Chemical testing (1)
- Colorado Supreme Court (1)
- Common law rule (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Domestic abuse (1)
- Driving under the influence (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Insanity defense (1)
- Lying in wait (1)
- Manslaughter (1)
- Manslaughter trial (1)
- Murder in the first degree (1)
- People v. Haeussler (1)
- Pretrial Procedure (1)
- Prima facie evidence (1)
- Question of fact (1)
- Rebuttable presumption (1)
- Refresh present recollection (1)
- Right to inspect memoranda (1)
- Rochin v. California (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
People V. Braddock [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Braddock [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An alleged conflict between the information and the evidence was not grounds for reversal of defendant's conviction where the substance of the indictment was sufficient to give defendant notice of the offense of which he was accused.
In Re Dixon [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
In Re Dixon [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Writ of habeas corpus was denied to petitioner convicted of counterfeiting because he was not entitled to a consideration of claims that were based upon his version of the conflicting evidence which could have been, but were not, raised on appeal.
The Bill Of Particulars In Virginia, Arthur W. Phelps
The Bill Of Particulars In Virginia, Arthur W. Phelps
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
People V. Thomas [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Thomas [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Instruction on lying in wait did not require a showing of intent to fix the degree and instruction distinguishing first and second degree murder in addition to the lying in wait instruction was sufficient.
People V. Lawrance, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Lawrance, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
There was sufficient evidence for the jury to infer that a victim's death was not accidental where the victim had been struck six times on the head with the same instrument.
People V. Haeussler [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Haeussler [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
At trial on charges of manslaughter and driving a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor, admission of testimony concerning the results of a blood test taken without defendant's consent did not deprive her of due process of law.
People V. Daugherty, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Daugherty, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
First-degree murder conviction was upheld when the intent to torture was established and the jury dismissed the insanity defense when the defendant failed to establish his insanity by a preponderance of the evidence.
People V. Costa [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Costa [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A deceased passenger's statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in defendant's trial for manslaughter as a spontaneous declaration.
Current Decision, Right To Inspect Memoranda Used To Revive Recollection, Howard Klemme
Current Decision, Right To Inspect Memoranda Used To Revive Recollection, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
Current Decision, Weight And Admissibility Of Chemical Tests As Evidence Of Intoxication, Howard Klemme
Current Decision, Weight And Admissibility Of Chemical Tests As Evidence Of Intoxication, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme
Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.