Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (3)
- Death penalty (2)
- Entrapment (2)
- Searches and seizures (2)
- Appeals (1)
-
- Arrest without warrant (1)
- Bail (1)
- Bail pending appeal (1)
- Circumstantial evidence (1)
- Criminal appeals (1)
- Criminal confessions (1)
- Cross examination (1)
- Demonstrative evidence (1)
- Expert Testimony (1)
- Harmless Error (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- Homicide (1)
- Illegal Prescriptions of Narcotics (1)
- Jury challenges (1)
- Misconduct of Jury (1)
- Misconduct of Prosecuting Attorney (1)
- Not guilty by reason of insanity (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Rights of Accused (1)
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
People V. Riser [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Riser [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
In a capital murder prosecution, a trial court's grant of the prosecution's challenge to a juror, who stated that in no event would he vote for the death penalty, was not error.
In Re Scaggs [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
In Re Scaggs [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Prisoner convicted of a felony and sentenced to imprisonment was not entitled to be admitted to bail as a matter of right but was compelled to address himself to the discretion of the court; there was no abuse of discretion in refusing bail.
People V. Crooker [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Crooker [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant's conviction for first-degree murder was proper where defendant failed to show that he did not receive fair trial as conflicting testimony about voluntariness of confession and denial of attorney during questioning supported jury verdict.
Caritativo V. Teets [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Caritativo V. Teets [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Writ of mandate would not issue to compel warden to institute proceedings to determine present sanity of defendant awaiting execution of death penalty after warden determined that there was not good reason to believe defendant was presently insane.
People V. Cole [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Cole [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Medical opinion as to whether the victim's wound could have been self-inflicted was admissible and sufficient evidence supported the verdict finding defendant guilty of first-degree murder.
People V. Head, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Head, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Motion to dismiss an appeal was denied where defendant made a constructive filing of a notice of appeal within the prescribed time limit and satisfied the jurisdictional requirement as contemplated by law.
People V. Watson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Watson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant was properly convicted of second degree murder as the jury was correctly instructed on the doctrine of reasonable doubt and an error in admitting collateral and irrelevant evidence did not result in the miscarriage of justice.
People V. Merkouris, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Merkouris, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant was due a new trial for his ex-wife's murder because trial court erred by permitting him to withdraw not guilty by reason of insanity plea over counsel's implied objection and because instructions to jury on lying in wait were improper.
People V. Nunn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Nunn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An osteopath's conviction for selling prescriptions for narcotics was proper because the regulatory code's use of the phrase "good faith" was not vague, and the prosecution's attempt to obtain narcotics from the osteopath was not entrapment.
People V. Rios [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Rios [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant's arrest for the possession of heroin was lawful where the officer had reasonable cause to believe that defendant had committed a felony after defendant admitted that he had taken an injection of heroin two weeks before.
Willson V. Superior Court Of San Diego County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Willson V. Superior Court Of San Diego County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Although defendant's conduct observed by an officer did not of itself constitute reasonable cause to believe she was committing a felony, it was sufficient to justify the officer's reliance on information regarding defendant's bookmaking.
Hill V. Superior Court Of Humboldt County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Hill V. Superior Court Of Humboldt County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Court-appointed attorneys who defended an indigent client charged with murder were not entitled to a writ compelling compensation of more than $ 1,000, where the payment was comparable to other jurisdictions and to that received by public employees.
People V. Blodgett [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Blodgett [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Although a prosecutor had improperly focused the jury on defendant's alleged prior heroin use, defendant's marijuana possession conviction was not reversed when the prosecutorial misconduct did not result in a miscarriage of justice.
People V. Malotte [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Malotte [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Where defendant discussed with police officers in a secretly taped conversation the commission of a crime, namely, provision of prostitutes, there was no unreasonable invasion of privacy when the conversation was used against her.