Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (14)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
-
- Illinois State University (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Western Kentucky University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law (4)
- Criminal law (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; Search and Seizure (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
-
- Habeas corpus (2)
- Search and Seizure (2)
- 17th century (1)
- 18 U.S.C.A. section 3731 (1)
- 18th century (1)
- Acquittal concept (1)
- Aderhold v. Soileau (1)
- African Americans (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Blacks (1)
- California Department of Justice (1)
- Capital Punishment (1)
- Children and the law (1)
- Co-Defendant Confession (1)
- Conficts of interest (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Arrest (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Search and Seizure (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional necessity (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Crime (1)
- Criminal Conspiracy (1)
- Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; Constitutional Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Supreme Court Case Files (14)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- California Agencies (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
-
- Williams v. Brown, 446 U.S. 236 (1980) (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Masters Theses & Specialist Projects (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Publications (1)
- Reviews (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Race And Sentencing Equality In Kentucky, Robert L. Hurley
Race And Sentencing Equality In Kentucky, Robert L. Hurley
Masters Theses & Specialist Projects
Disparity in sentencing felons based on racial considerations has long has been considered a problem for civil libertarians and scholars alike. Examining data gathered in Kentucky, this thesis addresses this issue through the application of recently developed methodological techniques. Utilizing an index of sentencing equality, this study shows that while differences do exist in black and white offender offense characteristics, these differences do not account for the variations in sentences rendered in cases of white as opposed to black felons. This exploratory research reviews and critiques previous research and provides evidence which should prove useful in resolving the problem of …
10-31-1979 Internal Memo, Unknown
10-31-1979 Internal Memo, Unknown
Williams v. Brown, 446 U.S. 236 (1980)
The thoughts of the Justices are recorded.
Constitutionalizing Forfeiture Law—The German Example, James Maxeiner
Constitutionalizing Forfeiture Law—The German Example, James Maxeiner
All Faculty Scholarship
This article demonstrates how German criminal law has made forfeiture of objects used in crime consistent with constitutional guarantees.
Rhode Island V. Innis, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Rhode Island V. Innis, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Roberts V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Payton V. New York, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Payton V. New York, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Crews, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Crews, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Rawlings V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Rawlings V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Havens, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Havens, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Adams V. Texas, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Chiarella V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Chiarella V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Reid V. Georgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Mendenhall, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Mendenhall, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Ybarra V. Illinois, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Ybarra V. Illinois, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Lewis V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Lewis V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Two Perspectives On Structuring Discretion: Justices Stewart And White On The Death Penalty, Larry I. Palmer
Two Perspectives On Structuring Discretion: Justices Stewart And White On The Death Penalty, Larry I. Palmer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Preliminary Hearing: A Necessary Part Of Due Process, Andrea Lyon
The Preliminary Hearing: A Necessary Part Of Due Process, Andrea Lyon
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Handbook On Domestic Violence, California Department Of Justice
Handbook On Domestic Violence, California Department Of Justice
California Agencies
This booklet was originally prepared as a program supplement for distribution at the Attorney General's Conference on Domestic Violence held during the week of April 24-28, 1978 in San Francisco and Los Angeles. The purpose of the Conference on Domestic Violence was to provide a statewide policy level forum for sharing the newest information available about law enforcement and criminal justice procedures for dealing with domestic violence.
03-21-1979 Clerk Memo, Luther Munford
03-21-1979 Clerk Memo, Luther Munford
Williams v. Brown, 446 U.S. 236 (1980)
Both the CAS's judgment and the complaint, App. 3a, 5a, list Leila G. Brown, et at., as plaintiffs, and Robert R. Williams, et al., as defendants.
Therefore a vote to affirm is a vote to uphold the finding of dilution and in favor of the plaintiffs.
Review Of Crime In England, 1550-1800, Thomas A. Green
Review Of Crime In England, 1550-1800, Thomas A. Green
Reviews
Crime in England, 1550-1800, is the second collection of essays on the social history of crime and the criminal law in early modern England to appear in recent years. Together with the essays in Albion's Fatal Tree (1975),' these offerings advance our knowledge of the subject considerably. To be sure, as G. R. Elton cautions, there are methodological problems in a field so new, and Elton's "Introduction" will serve as an excellent starting point for readers concerned with such matters. We must nevertheless recognize the accomplishments of the new school of socio-legal historians. The essays in this volume deal with …
Escape From Cruel And Unusual Punishment: A Theory Of Constitutional Necessity, Cynthia R. Farina
Escape From Cruel And Unusual Punishment: A Theory Of Constitutional Necessity, Cynthia R. Farina
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The inmate who escapes from a federal or state prison and seeks to introduce evidence of unconstitutionally cruel and unusual confinement conditions to defend her action is barred by the well-established rule that prison conditions alone, no matter how intolerable or inhumane, neither justify nor excuse escape. If she attempts to use the defense of necessity—a limited exception to this rule—the prisoner will be required to show that a specific, imminent threat of death or serious injury prompt her escape. Evidence of prolonged or repeated deprivation and mistreatment sufficient to prove a violation of the eighth amendment may not be …
The Jury-Some Thoughts, Historical And Personal, Peter Keane
The Jury-Some Thoughts, Historical And Personal, Peter Keane
Publications
rich baggage of our heritage and origins as a communal people. It is both what we have been and what we are now. From the jury's first crude forms developed by our primitive ancestors in thick groves of forest clearings, to contemporary juries in modern courtrooms listening to testimony about DNA and E. Coli Bacteria, the institution has been adequate to the tasks we give it. A jury is a more representative societal mechanism of our culture than anything else in which we participate as citizens.
Homicide In California, 1979, Department Of Justice
Homicide In California, 1979, Department Of Justice
California Agencies
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Book Iv, Thomas A. Green
Introduction To Book Iv, Thomas A. Green
Other Publications
The final volume of Blackstone's Commentaries sets forth a·lucid survey of crime and criminal procedure informed by those propositions concerning English law and the relations between man and state that characterize the entire work. Perhaps no area of the law so tested Blackstone's settled and complacent views as did the criminal law, particularly the large and growing body of statutory capital crimes. In the end, Blackstone failed to demonstrate that English criminal law reflected a coherent set of principles, but his intricate and often internally contradictory attempt nevertheless constitutes a classic description of that law, and can still be read …
Government Appeals In Criminal Cases: The 1978 Decisions, Edward H. Cooper
Government Appeals In Criminal Cases: The 1978 Decisions, Edward H. Cooper
Articles
The statute allowing the government to appeal from some forms of trial court defeat in criminal cases, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3731, has a long and tangled history. In its 1970 opinion in United States v. Sisson 9ui the Supreme Court wrestled mightily with a difficult problem under the statute as it then stood, and invited Congress to amend "this awkward and ancient Act." Soon afterward the act was amended. It now provides in part that the government may appeal in a criminal case
from a decision, judgment, or order of a district court dismissing an indictment or information as to …
The Confrontation Clause And Co-Defendant Confessions: The Drift From Bruton To Parker V. Randolph, Paul Marcus
The Confrontation Clause And Co-Defendant Confessions: The Drift From Bruton To Parker V. Randolph, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
An Analysis Of State Pretrial Diversion Statutes, Peter Zablotsky
An Analysis Of State Pretrial Diversion Statutes, Peter Zablotsky
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Co-Conspirator Declarations: The Federal Rules Of Evidence And Other Recent Developments, From A Criminal Law Perspective, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
Perhaps the most important advantage available to a prosecutor in a criminal conspiracy case is the exception to the hearsay rule for co-conspirator declarations. The exception is widely used and is often a significant part of the government presentation. In essence, it provides that otherwise inadmissible hearsay declarations of coconspirators are admissible at trial against the defendant so long as they were made during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. The exception typically arises when an alleged co-conspirator declarant tells the witness (often an undercover police officer) all about the conspiracy, perhaps in the hope of attracting a …