Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abstain from the fray (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Citron (1)
- Complexity (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
-
- Contract (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crisis (1)
- Cyber searches (1)
- Cyberlaw (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Ex parte communications (1)
- FBI agents (1)
- Federal Judge (1)
- Filartiga v. Pena-Irala (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Government lawyers (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Impartial (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Intra-contract level (1)
- Judicial abilities (1)
- Kastner (1)
- Levine (1)
- Liberal judge (1)
- Limitations (1)
- Long Shadow of United States v. Rosenberg: A Biographical Perspective on the Hon. Irving Robert Kaufman (1)
- Michelle Zakarin (1)
- Modular design (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Supreme Court’S Hands-Off Approach To Religious Questions In The Era Of Covid-19 And Beyond, Samuel J. Levine
The Supreme Court’S Hands-Off Approach To Religious Questions In The Era Of Covid-19 And Beyond, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Long Shadow Of United States V. Rosenberg: A Biographical Perspective On The Hon. Irving Robert Kaufman, Rodger D. Citron
The Long Shadow Of United States V. Rosenberg: A Biographical Perspective On The Hon. Irving Robert Kaufman, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Systemic Risk Of Contract, Tal Kastner
Systemic Risk Of Contract, Tal Kastner
Scholarly Works
Complexity and uncertainty define our world, now more than ever. Scholars and practitioners have celebrated modular contract design as an especially effective tool to manage these challenges. Modularity divides complex structures into relatively discrete, independent components with simple connections. The benefits of this fundamental drafting approach are intuitive. Lawyers divide contracts into sections and provisions to make them easier to understand and reduce uncertainty. Dealmakers constructing complex transactions use portable agreements as building blocks to reduce drafting costs and enable innovation. Little attention, however, has been paid to the risks introduced by modularity in contracts. This Article demonstrates how this …
Requiring What’S Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent And Revisiting Officer Inadvertence In Cyberlaw Cases, Michelle Zakarin
Requiring What’S Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent And Revisiting Officer Inadvertence In Cyberlaw Cases, Michelle Zakarin
Scholarly Works
As the age of technology has taken this country by surprise and left us with an inability to formally prepare our legal system to incorporate these advances, many courts are forced to adapt by applying pre-technology rules to new technological scenarios. One illustration is the plain view exception to the Fourth Amendment. Recently, the issue of officer inadvertence at the time of the search, a rule that the United States Supreme Court has specifically stated is not required in plain view inquiries, has been revisited in cyber law cases. It could be said that the courts interested in the existence …