Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

Limitations On The Right To Demonstrate, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1966

Limitations On The Right To Demonstrate, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Powell Speeches

No abstract provided.


The Disordered Society, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Sep 1966

The Disordered Society, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Powell Speeches

Powell delivered this speech before the Virginia Manufacturers Association in Williamsburg, Virginia. The Association printed a version of the speech in pamphlet form under the title, "Building Respect For Law and Order: The Foundation of Our Society at Stake."


Program: Naacp Freedom Banquet And Biography Of Speaker Charles Evers Sep 1966

Program: Naacp Freedom Banquet And Biography Of Speaker Charles Evers

Textual material from the Rodney Lawrence Hurst, Sr. Papers

Freedom Banquet held on Friday, September 2, 1966. Charles Evers, brother of Medgar Evers was the keynote speaker.


The University And The Liberty Of Its Students -- A Fiduciary Theory, Alvin L. Goldman Jul 1966

The University And The Liberty Of Its Students -- A Fiduciary Theory, Alvin L. Goldman

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The disciplinary power of a university is a force which every student has cause to fear. The exercise, or threat of exercise, of a school’s disciplinary power is felt in every area of campus life. Invocation of disciplinary sanctions against a student whose personal conduct or attitudes contravene standards dear to the school authorities has occurred in such ludicrous cases as the failure of a co-ed to be a “typical Syracuse girl.” In another case, a student was expelled because she refused to pay purported debts which she asserted were properly her husband’s obligations. As insidious as it may be …


Bias In Housing: Toward A New Approach, Charles E. Rice Jan 1966

Bias In Housing: Toward A New Approach, Charles E. Rice

Journal Articles

The problem of racial discrimination in housing is the product of several factors. Among these is racial prejudice on the part of private land owners, real estate brokers, builders and mortgage finance institutions.


Elfbrandt V. Russell: The Demise Of The Loyalty Oath, Jerold H. Israel Jan 1966

Elfbrandt V. Russell: The Demise Of The Loyalty Oath, Jerold H. Israel

Articles

In Elfbrandt v. Russell, the Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 decision, declared unconstitutional Arizona's requirement of a loyalty oath from state employees. At first glance, Elfbrandt appears to be just another decision voiding a state loyalty oath on limited grounds relating to the specific language of the particular oath. Yet, several aspects of Mr. Justice Douglas' opinion for the majority suggest that Elfbrandt is really of far greater significance: it may sharply limit the scope and coverage of loyalty oaths generally and, indeed, may presage a ruling invalidating all such oaths. Of course, only the Supreme Court can determine this. …


Voting Rights Act Of 1965: Some Dissenting Observations, Charles E. Rice Jan 1966

Voting Rights Act Of 1965: Some Dissenting Observations, Charles E. Rice

Journal Articles

On March 7, 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States, over the partial dissent of Mr. Justice Black, sustained the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In the mode of its adoption, the reach of its provisions, and the strength of the reactions it aroused, the act was extraordinary. And the decision which sustained it was no less so in its legitimation of expanded administrative power and in its effect upon the balance of federal and state powers. In order to assess the act, and incidentally the ruling which sustained it, it will be helpful to sketch the basic voting …


Federal Public-Accommodations Law: A Dissent, Charles E. Rice Jan 1966

Federal Public-Accommodations Law: A Dissent, Charles E. Rice

Journal Articles

Discrimination in public accommodations presents the most appealing case for compulsory civil-rights legislation. In practical terms, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has eliminated much of the existing segregation in public accommodations, and, with continued enforcement, the job should be soon completed even in the most hostile areas of the South. The public-accommodations problem, therefore, is no longer a live issue. It is useful, however, to touch upon it, for those who would restrain federal power are often challenged by the taunt, "What would you do about public accommodations? Would you leave it up to the states? How would you …