Law Commons^™

Sacred Cows, Holy Wars, Kenneth Lasson

Kenneth Lasson

ED COWS, HOLY WARS Exploring the Limits of Law in the Regulation of Raw Milk and Kosher Meat By Kenneth Lasson Abstract In a free society law and religion seldom coincide comfortably, tending instead to reflect the inherent tension that often resides between the two. This is nowhere more apparent than in America, where the underlying principle upon which the first freedom enunciated by the Constitution’s Bill of Rights is based ‒ the separation of church and state – is conceptually at odds with the pragmatic compromises that may be reached. But our adherence to the primacy of individual rights …

Contracting In The Modern World, Enrico Baffi

enrico baffi

In this paper we try explore some of the basic features of mass contracting. In our opinion, there are basically four characteristics of mass contracting: the reduced negotiations, the dissemination of standard form contracts, the presence of abusive clauses, and the recapitulation of the contract and its execution in a single act of stipulation. a) The reduction in negotiations is the result first of all of the costs that this activity requires and of the costs required to manage personalised contracts; secondly, this reduction is the consequence of the greater advantage of mass-produced goods compared to personalised goods; ) The …

Contracting In The Modern World, Enrico Baffi

enrico baffi

In this paper I try explore some of the basic features of modern mass contracting. In my opinion, there are basically four characteristics of modern mass contracting: a)he reduced negotiations; b) the dissemination of standard form contracts; c) the presence of abusive clauses; d) and the recapitulation of the contract and its execution in a single act of stipulation. All the changes are the consequences in the changes of relative costs of activities: a) The reduction in negotiations is the result first of all of the costs that this activity requires and of the costs required to manage personalized contracts; …

Standard Contract Clauses As Public Goods. A New Way Of Reasoning, Enrico Baffi

enrico baffi

The aim of this work is to show how it is possible to identify market failures other than those traditionally identified by lawyers and law and economics scholars to justify the mandatory provisions of contracts between professionals and consumers and the equally mandatory provisions governing the abuse of economic dependency. This is a new approach that can be extended to other provisions and appears to rest on fairly solid microeconomic foundations. There is no doubt, however, that many criticisms can be leveled against it. Very briefly, I shall argue that the production of clauses characterized by being rather vague, indeterminate …

Class Arbitration: The Necessary Counterpart To The Arbitrability Of Statutory Rights, Laura Yvonne Zielinski

Laura Yvonne Zielinski

Why is it so problematic to restrict the availability of class arbitration in the United States? I will argue in my paper that class arbitration is a compromise between the pro-arbitration policy and the protection of weaker parties and thus necessary to sustain the liberal American model of arbitration. It is indeed the necessary counterpart to the arbitrability of statutory rights.

During the last thirty years, the policy of the United States towards arbitration has become increasingly favourable and the introduction of arbitration clauses into all sorts of contracts, including adhesion contracts between parties of highly unequal bargaining power, has …

Opting Out Of The Procedural Morass: A Solution To The Class Arbitration Problem, Emanwel J. Turnbull

Emanwel J Turnbull

American class actions are internationally regarded as a procedural form to avoid and widely criticized in the United States. They have been narrowed and restricted by U.S. statutes and case law. Plaintiffs' lawyers in consumer class actions are portrayed as greedy and fraudulent, while businesses are increasingly acting to avoid class actions through mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clauses. Even class arbitration is criticized as leading to a “procedural morass.” This Article proposes that parties and arbitral fora opt out of the American procedural morass (and the attendant long-running disputes about American class actions) by adopting an English procedural rule for aggregation. …

Eminently Reasonable, David J. Reiss

David J Reiss

Local governments across the country are considering an innovative use of eminent domain. They propose to condemn underwater mortgages (those that exceed the fair-market value of the home) in their communities and restructure them so that home­owners can afford their payments and so that the new mortgage is for less than the fair market value of the property. If this proposal is implemented, the local government will pay the owner of mortgages of "underwater" homes the fair market value for the mortgages. The local government will then restructure each mortgage by reducing the principal amount owed to be in line …

Direct And Enhanced Disclosure Of Researcher Financial Conflicts, Roy G. Spece Jr.

Roy G Spece Jr.

Abstract of DIRECT AND ENHANCED DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCHER FINANCIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: THE ROLE OF TRUST In earlier writing I recommended direct disclosure of a major researcher financial conflict of interest, per capita funding—i.e., providing a fixed sum per subject recruited and enrolled in a study. This article adds a recommendation for enhanced direct disclosure. The enhancement in the disclosure is a summary of why per capita and excess payments are being discussed. The reason they are being discussed is because of their risk of introducing bias into researchers’ decisions regarding study design, implementation, and interpretation as well as concerning …

Comment On The Use Of Eminent Domain To Restructure Performing Loans, David J. Reiss

David J Reiss

There has been a lot of fear-mongering by financial industry trade groups over the widespread use of eminent domain to residential mortgages. While there may be legitimate business reasons to oppose its use, its inconsistency with Takings jurisprudence should not be one of them. To date, the federal government’s responses to the current crisis in the housing markets have been at cross purposes, half-hearted and self-defeating. So it is not surprising that local governments are attempting to fashion solutions to the problem with the tools at their disposal. Courts should, and likely will, give these democratically-implemented and constitutionally-sound solutions a …

Public Goods And Contract Standard Clauses: A New Approach, Enrico Baffi

enrico baffi

The aim of this work is to show how it is possible to identify market failures other than those traditionally identified by lawyers and law and economics scholars to justify the mandatory provisions of contracts between professionals and consumers and the equally mandatory provisions governing the abuse of economic dependency. This is a new approach that can be extended to other provisions and appears to rest on fairly solid microeconomic foundations. There is no doubt, however, that many criticisms can be leveled against it. Very briefly, I shall argue that the production of clauses characterized by being rather vague, indeterminate …

"Ineffective In Any Form: Confirmation Biases And Other Psychological Phenomena Undermine Improved Home Loan Disclosures", Debra P. Stark, Jessica M. Choplin

Debra Pogrund Stark

This article reports three eye-tracking experiments funded by the National Science Foundation that investigated the limitations of home-loan disclosure forms as a means of protecting consumers from imprudent or otherwise unsuitable home loans. These experiments found that presenting misleading information (such as “your interest rate is at 4%” when in fact that interest rate can rise to 8% over the life of the loan) can cause consumers to exhibit confirmation biases wherein they inappropriately skim the form to confirm the misleading information (a rate of 4%), and ignore information that would disconfirm those beliefs (that the rate can rise). These …

The Good Faith Approach To Foreclosure Mediation: An Assessment Of Washington's Foreclosure Mediation Program, Scott P. Kennedy

Scott P. Kennedy

Since 2007, concerns over high home foreclosure rates have played a dominant role in U.S. economic news and policy, and several states have responded with bold statutory and regulatory innovations. In July of 2011, Washington State implemented one such innovation: the Foreclosure Fairness Act (FFA). It grants defaulting homeowners the right to initiate a mediation in which lenders must consider the alternatives to foreclosure in good faith. This article assesses the Washington model's potential to mitigate the forces frustrating foreclosure prevention. Despite the increasing viability of foreclosure's alternatives, national foreclosure rates remain high. Poor lender-borrower dialogue, a system of perverse …

Dysfunctional Contracts And The Laws And Practices That Enable Them: An Empirical Analysis, Debra P. Stark, Jessica M. Choplin

Debra Pogrund Stark

The main function of entering into a contract is for both parties to be bound through being exposed to negative consequences if they breach. A review of purchase agreement forms used by condominium developers in Chicago, Illinois discovered that 79% eliminate the negative consequences for sellers by providing for highly one-sided remedies wherein the buyer’s sole remedy in the event of the seller’s breach was the return of the buyer’s own earnest money while reserving significant remedies to the developer in the event of the buyer’s default. Courts in many jurisdictions have refused to strike down this type of limitation …

Behavioral Exploitation Antitrust In Consumer Subprime Mortgage Lending, Max Huffman, Daniel Heidtke

Max Huffman

We analyze whether antitrust might provide an alternative and perhaps superior approach to regulating consumer subprime mortgage lending. Behavioral exploitation antitrust targets commercial conduct of the sort that was observed in consumer subprime mortgage lending in the years leading up to 2007. The welfare effects of that conduct are easily established. Antitrust-based regulation can mitigate those welfare effects. Regulation that does exist, which operates at the level of the individual transaction, may be easily avoided, may be short-sighted, may suffer from enforcement problems that public choice theory explains, and/or may overreach by removing consumer choice. We show that antitrust enforcement …

Transparently Opaque: Understanding The Lack Of Transparency In Insurance Consumer Protection, Daniel Schwarcz

Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz

Consumer protection in most domains of financial regulation centers on transparency. Broadly construed, transparency involves making relevant information available to consumers as well as others who might act on their behalf, such as academics, journalists, newspapers, consumer organizations or other market watchdogs. By contrast, command and control regulation that affirmatively limits financial firms’ products or pricing is relatively uncommon in financial regulation. This Article describes a remarkable inversion of this pattern: while state insurance regulation frequently employs aggressive command and control consumer protection regulation, it typically does little or nothing to promote transparent markets. Rather, state lawmakers routinely either completely …

Monopolies And The Constitution: A History Of Crony Capitalism, Steven G. Calabresi

Steven G Calabresi

This article explores the right of the people to be free from government granted monopolies or from what we would today call “Crony Capitalism.” We trace the constitutional history of this right from Tudor England down to present day state and federal constitutional law. We begin with Darcy v. Allen (also known as the Case of Monopolies decided in 1603) and the Statute of Monopolies of 1624, both of which prohibited English Kings and Queens from granting monopolies. We then show how the American colonists relied on English rights to be free from government granted monopolies during the Revolutionary War …

Religion And The Equal Protection Clause, Steven G. Calabresi, Abe Salander

Steven G Calabresi

This article argues that state action that discriminates on the basis of religion is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Doctrine even if it does not violate the Establishment Clause or the Free Exercise Clause as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment. State action that discriminates on the basis of religion should be subject to strict scrutiny and should almost always be held unconstitutional. We thus challenge the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez in which a 5 to 4 majority of the Court wrongly allowed a California state school to discriminate against a Christian Legal Society chapter …

How Government Guarantees In Housing Finance Promote Stability, David Min

David Min

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, major reforms of the U.S. housing finance system are likely. One of the key issues facing policy makers in this area is whether and to what extent the federal government should maintain its current role in the residential mortgage markets. Since the New Deal, the federal government has guaranteed the primary sources of housing finance in the United States—bank and thrift deposits, and the obligations of the mortgage securitization conduits Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae.

The prevailing view of government guarantees is that they increase financial instability because they encourage excessive …

How Government Guarantees In Housing Finance Promote Stability, David Min

David Min

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, major reforms of the U.S. housing finance system are likely. One of the key issues facing policy makers in this area is whether and to what extent the federal government should maintain its current role in the residential mortgage markets. Since the New Deal, the federal government has guaranteed the primary sources of housing finance in the United States—bank and thrift deposits, and the obligations of the mortgage securitization conduits Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae.

The prevailing view of government guarantees is that they increase financial instability because they encourage excessive …

Consumers: The (Still) Missing Piece In A Piecemeal Approach To Privacy, Clark Asay

Clark Asay

U.S. consumers have little actual control over how companies collect, use, and disclose their personal information. This paper identifies two specific instances of this lack of control under U.S. law related to third-party disclosures, what I call the Incognito and Onward Transfer Problems. It then identifies the types of privacy harms that result and examines the advantages and possible drawbacks of a model law aimed at addressing these specific problems. The model law is based on a system of consumer notice and choice, the predominant method used in the U.S. to provide consumers with control over their information. Up until …

Novare Group V. Sarif: Buyer Beware; Georgia Consumers Can't Rely On The Fair Business Practices Act, Mark E. Budnitz

Mark E. Budnitz

The article discusses the Georgia Supreme Court’s decision, Novare Group v. Sarif, 290 Ga. 186, 718 S.E.2d 304 (2011). The article analyzes the court’s response to the plaintiffs’ claim that the defendant brokers and developers violated the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), Georgia’s primary consumer protection statute. I contend that the court’s approach undermines the FBPA. I describe the General Assembly’s purpose in enacting the FBPA and criticize the court for treating claims under the FBPA the same as common law fraud claims. I also examine the court’s treatment of parol evidence and merger clauses. I discuss the implications …

Vertical Boilerplate, James Gibson

James Gibson

Despite what we learn in law school about the “meeting of the minds,” most contracts are merely boilerplate -- take-it-or-leave-it propositions. Negotiation is nonexistent; we rely on our collective market power as consumers to regulate contracts’ content. But boilerplate imposes certain information costs, because it often arrives late in the transaction and is hard to understand. If those costs get too high, then the market mechanism fails. So how high are boilerplate’s information costs? A few studies have attempted to measure them, but they all use a “horizontal” approach -- i.e., they sample a single stratum of boilerplate and assume …

Adr’S Place In Foreclosure: Remedying The Flaws Of A Securitized Housing Market, Lydia Nussbaum

Lydia R. Nussbaum

Millions of Americans lost their homes during the foreclosure crisis, an unprecedented disaster still plaguing local and national economies. A primary factor contributing to the crisis has been the failure of conventional foreclosure procedures to account for the new realities of securitization and the secondary mortgage market, which transformed the traditional borrower-lender relationship. To compensate for the shortcomings of conventional foreclosure procedures and stem the tide of residential foreclosure, state and local governments turned to ADR processes for a solution. Some foreclosure ADR programs, however, have greater potential to avoid unnecessary foreclosures than others. This article comprehensively examines the key …

Adr's Place In Foreclosure: Remedying The Flaws Of A Securitized Housing Market, Lydia Nussbaum

Lydia R. Nussbaum

Millions of Americans lost their homes during the foreclosure crisis, an unprecedented disaster still plaguing local and national economies. A primary factor contributing to the crisis has been the failure of conventional foreclosure procedures to account for the new realities of securitization and the secondary mortgage market, which transformed the traditional borrower-lender relationship. To compensate for the shortcomings of conventional foreclosure procedures and stem the tide of residential foreclosure, state and local governments turned to ADR processes for a solution. Some foreclosure ADR programs, however, have greater potential to avoid unnecessary foreclosures than others. This article comprehensively examines the key …

Mental Budget: Inefficient Clauses Or Consumer Choices?, Enrico Baffi

enrico baffi

In this paper I aim to demonstrate that due the phenomenon of consumer mental accounting, it's not possible to consider money as fungible. Consumers decide to spend a certain amount of money for a kind of good and they are not willing to take some extra money from the jars that contain the money to spend for other goods. But consumers seem to have a sort of reserve which encompass efforts, time, and the possibility to bear risk that they use to save money and obtain a lower price for a good. To explain, a good can be delivered at …

El Derecho Al Trato Justo, A La Equidad Y A La Educación Financiera De Los Consumidores, Jose R. Nina Cuentas

Jose R. Nina Cuentas

Tema de Protección del Usuario Financiero en la Contratación de Créditos de Consumo.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Financial Regulation For The 21st Century

Patricia A. McCoy

After existing regulatory systems failed to prevent the recent financial crisis, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a sweeping reform designed to alleviate the crisis and prevent its recurrence. Out of this Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was born. This new agency is charged with making markets for consumer financial products and services work for Americans, a task that was previously spread out among seven different federal agencies with varying priorities. This Article describes, with a series of concrete case studies, four key principles that have guided the Bureau as it strives to fulfill …

Novare Group V. Sarif: Buyer Beware; Georgia Consumers Can't Rely On The Fair Business Practices Act, Mark E. Budnitz

Mark E. Budnitz

In Novare Group v. Sarif, 290 Ga. 186, 718 S.E.2d 304 (2011), the Georgia Supreme Court substantially thwarted the legislature's intention in enacting the Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), Georgia's primary consumer protection statute. The article analyzes the court’s approach to the plaintiffs’ claim that the defendant brokers and developers violated the FBPA. I examine the court’s approach to parol evidence and merger clauses. I describe the General Assembly’s purpose in enacting the FBPA and criticize the court for treating claims under the FBPA the same as common law fraud claims. I discuss the implications for future actions seeking redress …

Comment On The Federal Housing Finance Agency’S Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2013-2017, David J. Reiss

David J Reiss

This is a comment upon Performance Goal 4.3 from the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2013-2017. Performance Goal 4.3 addresses the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as well as the future of the infrastructure of the residential housing finance market. This comment will address the future of Fannie and Freddie after they exit conservatorship. Once analyzed in the context of regulatory theory, Fannie and Freddie’s future seems clear. They should be privatized so that they can compete on an even playing field with other financial institutions, and their public functions should be assumed by pure …

Brands As Food For Thought: The Case For Regulating Food Brands, Amir H. Khoury

Amir Khoury

Every brand, in its original capacity as a trademark, is intended to identify and to differentiate a certain type of product or service from other competing products or services. This is the original purpose of marks. But, over time, this (original) purpose has been overrun by a different reality. Food Brands now harness a dual power or impact. The first refers to their Market Impact i.e. their ability to overshadow competing brands, and the other relates to their Consumption Impact; i.e. their ability to generate wants and to shape the image of the foods that we consume. This is not …