Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Takings clause (3)
- Conceptual severance (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (2)
- Nollan-Dolan doctrine (2)
-
- Takings doctrine (2)
- Takings jurisprudence (2)
- Ante-mortem probate (1)
- Berman v. Parker (1)
- Bruce Ackerman (1)
- Charles Reich (1)
- Conservatorship model (1)
- Constitutional property claims (1)
- Constitutional property clause (1)
- County of Wayne v. Hathcock (1)
- Dolan v. City of Tigard (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Due process clause (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Eminent domain power (1)
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles (1)
- Flemming v. Nestor (1)
- German Constitutional Court (1)
- Goldberg v. Kelly (1)
- Guardian ad litem (1)
- John Langbein (1)
- Just compensation (1)
- Kelo v. City of New London (1)
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission (1)
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Eminent Domain And Secondary Rent-Seeking, Gregory S. Alexander
Eminent Domain And Secondary Rent-Seeking, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No abstract provided.
Takings, Narratives, And Power, Gregory S. Alexander
Takings, Narratives, And Power, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
"The Regulatory Takings Problem" is the title given to a story, or narrative, that has become prominent in the literature on just compensation issues. The story is one of power and fear. It is about a perceived imbalance of power between the two groups of actors involved in the process of public land-use regulation--private landowners and government regulators. It depicts scenarios of past or threatened abuse of power by local land-use regulators, and it looks to the takings clause generally and regulatory takings doctrine specifically as crucial corrective devices, essential to set the power imbalance aright. The dominant narrative describes …
Property As A Fundamental Constitutional Right? The German Example, Gregory Alexander
Property As A Fundamental Constitutional Right? The German Example, Gregory Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No abstract provided.
Alternative Models Of Ante-Mortem Probate And Procedural Due Process Limitations On Succession, Gregory S. Alexander, Albert M. Pearson
Alternative Models Of Ante-Mortem Probate And Procedural Due Process Limitations On Succession, Gregory S. Alexander, Albert M. Pearson
Gregory S Alexander
Ante-mortem probate stands as a significant recent development in the American law of wealth succession. It confronts a problem that seriously impairs our probate system, the depredatious will contest, and promises to help revitalize the probate process. Already enacted in several states and currently under active study by the Joint Editorial Board of the Uniform Probate Code and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, ante-mortem probate is likely to be widely implemented in some form. But while legislators and academics alike support ante-mortem probate as a general idea, disagreement has emerged over the specific form it should …
Ten Years Of Takings, Gregory Alexander
Ten Years Of Takings, Gregory Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No area of property law has been more controversial in the past decade than takings. No aspect of constitutional law more sharply poses the dilemma about the legitimate powers of the regulatory state than the just compensation question. No question concerning constitutional property is more intractable than what sorts of government regulatory actions constitute uncompensated "takings" of private property. Limitations of space, not to mention my own ambivalence about many of the issues, prevent me from developing a complete normative theory of the proper scope of the Takings Clause. My aim here is vastly more modest: to outline the basic …
"Takings" Jurisprudence In The U.S. Supreme Court: The Past 10 Years, Gregory S. Alexander
"Takings" Jurisprudence In The U.S. Supreme Court: The Past 10 Years, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No area of American property law has been more controversial in recent years than the government regulation of uses of private property. No aspect of American constitutional law more sharply poses the dilemma about the legitimate powers of the regulatory state than the requirement that the government pay compensation for takings of property. The purpose of this essay is to acquaint the non-American legal scholar who is unfamiliar with the recent developments in the United States Supreme Court “takings” jurisprudence. The essay does not presuppose any background knowledge about either American constitutional or property law. Instead it attempts to familiarize …
The Concept Of Property In Private And Constitutional Law: The Ideology Of The Scientific Turn In Legal Analysis, Gregory S. Alexander
The Concept Of Property In Private And Constitutional Law: The Ideology Of The Scientific Turn In Legal Analysis, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
In recent academic writing on the general problem of constitutional protection of property under the takings clause and due process clauses, a mode of analysis has emerged that is evidently different from the conventional analysis of constitutional property claims. In general terms, this new mode is characterized by an effort to analyze claims on an openly teleological and systematic basis. To be sure, this mode is not exclusively of recent origin. But it is a discernible trend in the body of scholarship that discusses constitutional protection of property in the context of previously unfamiliar sorts of private economic interests. Most …
Takings And The Post-Modern Dialectic Of Property, Gregory S. Alexander
Takings And The Post-Modern Dialectic Of Property, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No abstract provided.