Law Commons^™

The Evolution Of The Us Drm Debate, 1987-2006, Bill D. Herman

Bill D. Herman

Scholars who discuss copyright often observe that the voices for stronger copyright have more financial and political capital than their opponents and thus tend to win in Congress. While the playing field is still quite slanted toward stronger copyright, the politics around the issue are much messier and less predictable. This study, a detailed political and legislative history of the major proposals regarding copyright and digital rights management from 1987 to 2006, illustrates how this policy dynamic has changed so drastically. In 1987, there was no organized opposition to copyright’s expansion. By 2006, however, there was a substantial coalition of …

The Rise And Permanence Of Quasi-Legislative Independent Commissions, Gabriel Gillett, Steven R. Ross, Raphael A. Prober

Gabriel Gillett

This article explores Congress’s recent trend of creating quasi-legislative independent commissions to augment its own investigations, and determines what factors may enhance the chance that a commission will prove successful. Although Congress has never been the lone forum for investigations, since 2001 the legislature has been empanelling entities of outside experts to investigate the most significant economic and national security issues. This Article begins with a history of governmental investigations in America, highlighting activity by Congress, independent agencies, and presidential commissions. Next, it describes the modern political, communications, and scheduling strains on Congress that have created an opportunity for new …

Watching The Hen House: Judicial Review Of Judicial Rulemaking, Carrie Leonetti

Carrie Leonetti

Courts regularly engage in rulemaking of questionable constitutionality, then exercise the exclusive jurisdiction of judicial review to rule on constitutional challenges to the rules that they themselves have promulgated, obfuscating the appearance of impartiality and accountability and preventing the unsophisticated from realizing that a benefit has been conferred on a more sophisticated faction.

Quasi-legislative judicial rulemaking that has resulted from Congressional delegations of rulemaking authority to the courts is increasingly prevalent in the past half century, the result of which is a multi-tiered system of consultation, review, and revision that depends heavily upon nonlegislative actors and a Balkanization of the …

Incommensurability, Practices And Points Of View: Revitalizing H.La. Hart’S Practice Theory Of Rules, Eric J. Miller

Eric J. Miller

The standard reading of H.L.A. Hart’s practice theory of rules is that it failed to provide a sufficient normative basis for a theory of law. That standard reading rests upon a significant misunderstanding: that Hart has an exclusionary reason approach to law. Instead, Hart understands law to be a social practice, one capable of generating valid norms that not only block the operation of moral norms, but which are wholesale incommensurable with them.

Wholesale incommensurability entails that law, as a form of social practice, constitutes a discrete normative system in which the truth-conditions of legal propositions are distinct from the …

Fitness Tax Credits: Costs, Benefits, And Viability, Daniel Reach

Daniel Reach

As the number of overweight and obese Americans rises, it becomes increasingly clear that Americans need further incentives to stimulate lasting lifestyle changes. Tax incentives focused on exercise, which have been largely unexplored to this point, are an effective response to the growing obesity problem in the United States that would largely avoid the special-interest opposition that tax policies focused on diet have encountered. In addition, they would also provide a more palatable solution for the taxpayer beneficiaries with a relatively low impact on government revenues. Viable tax incentives to encourage greater fitness include tax credits and sales tax breaks, …

Sustainable Procurement Is Smart Procurement: A Primer For Local Governments To Successfully Implement Sustainable Procurement Policies, Zachary R. Kobrin

Zachary R Kobrin

Most local governments do not understand the benefits of sustainable procurement or how to successfully implement these policies. This article discusses the challenges facing local governments when adopting sustainable procurement policies and makes recommendations to successfully implement sustainable procurement. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency describes sustainable procurement as the purchasing of products or services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose. For local governments, sustainable procurement can also be defined by the benefits it will provide the local environment and economy. Before …

Why The Demands Of Formalism Will Prevent New Originalism From Furthering Conservative Political Goals, Daniel James Hornal

Daniel Hornal

Proponents of New Originalism propose that their modifications solve the indeterminacy and predictability problems inherent in early conceptions of originalism. This paper argues that excluding extrinsic evidence and relying only on the formal implications of the text merely switches one indeterminacy and predictability problem for another. Rules inherently carry implications unknown to rule writers. In the case of open-textured rules such as those in the Constitution, a broad reading can occupy whole fields of law, whereas a narrow reading can have almost no real-world effects. Because they must ignore extrinsic evidence, new originalists are almost unbound in their choice of …

Advisory Adjudication, Girardeau A. Spann

Girardeau A Spann

"Advisory Adjudication" uses the recent Supreme Court decision in Camreta v. Greene as a takeoff point to discuss the way in which inconsistent demands make our conception of judicial review incoherent. In Camreta, the Supreme Court paradoxically issued an advisory opinion in the process of holding that it did not have jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions. I argue that this illustrates the manner in which we want the Supreme Court to act as a prospective policymaking body in a tricameral legislative process, while simultaneously insisting that the Court pretend merely to be engaged in the process of retrospective dispute-resolution. I …

United States V. Arizona: The Support Our Law Enforcement And Neighborhoods Act Is Preempted And Discriminatory, Melissa D. Goolsarran

Melissa D Goolsarran

In this paper I argue that S.B. 1070 should be not be upheld for two reasons. First, in ways that will be explicated below, S.B. 1070 directly conflicts with federal immigration law; thus it is preempted according to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Second, the law is unconstitutional because it allows for discrimination by police officers on the basis of race or national origin. This Note contends that the Ninth Circuit correctly affirmed the decision of the lower court to find S.B. 1070 preempted by federal immigration law; however the Ninth Circuit should have also found that S.B. 1070 …

Campaign Finance: Public Funding After Bennett, Nicholas Bamman

Nicholas Bamman

This Article is the first to examine the effects of the Supreme Court’s recent decision Az. Free Enter. Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett on campaign finance. To comply with Bennett, several states and localities will have to amend their campaign finance laws. This article proposes several public funding options that will survive current constitutional jurisprudence and the policy implications of each.

Earmarking Earmarking, Mariano-Florentino Cuellar

Mariano-Florentino Cuellar

In the realm of lawmaking, to earmark means roughly to designate (through a statutory provision or an accompanying committee report) certain appropriated funds for narrow (nearly always geographically-delimited) purposes that appear to benefit particular interests. Policymakers, civil society organizations, and scholarly observers routinely condemn earmarking as a practice putatively tied to corruption, or reflecting abuse of the political process –critiques that have spawned a variety of recent reform efforts. Yet a meticulous prescriptive evaluation of the practice soon raises fairly profound questions encompassing institutional design, legal theory, organizational practice, and the role of a cognitively-overburdened public in a democracy. Upon …

Safeguarding The Safeguards: The Extension Of Structural Protection To Non-Fundamental Liberties, Abigail R. Moncrieff

Abigail R. Moncrieff

As the lawsuits challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) have evolved, one feature of the litigation has proven especially rankling to the legal academy: the incorporation of substantive libertarian concerns into the structural federalism analysis. The breadth and depth of scholarly criticism is surprising, however, given that judges frequently choose indirect methods, including structural and process-based methods of the kinds at issue in the ACA litigation, for protecting substantive constitutional values. Indeed, indirection in the protection of constitutional liberties is a well-known and well-theorized strategy, which one scholar recently termed “semisubstantive review” and another recently theorized as …

The Execution Of Cameron Todd Willingham: Junk Science, An Innocent Man, And The Politics Of Death, Paul C. Giannelli

Paul C. Giannelli

Cameron Todd Willingham was tried and executed for the arson deaths of his three little girls. The expert testimony offered against him to establish arson was junk science. The case has since become infamous, the subject of an award-winning New Yorker article, numerous newspaper accounts, and several television shows. It also became enmeshed in the death penalty debate and the reelection of Texas Governor Rick Perry, who refused to grant a stay of execution after a noted arson expert submitted a report debunking the “science” offered at Willingham’s trial. The governor has since attempted to derail an investigation by the …

Safeguarding The Safeguards: The Aca Litigation And The Extension Of Structural Protection To Non-Fundamental Liberties, Abigail R. Moncrieff

Abigail R. Moncrieff

This article confronts and challenges an emerging scholarly consensus that criticizes the hybridization of substantive and structural arguments in the litigation over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Although there is no doubt that the ACA plaintiffs have requested and the ACA judges have provided a hybrid substantive-structural holding, there is nothing at all unusual about this indirect strategy for protecting constitutional liberty interests; it is a well-known and well-theorized strategy, which one scholar recently termed “semisubstantive review.” The article considers three possible distinctions between the ACA case and the ordinary case of semisubstantive review, and concludes that …

"Not That Smart": Sonia Sotomayor And The Construction Of Merit, Guy-Uriel E. Charles Mr., Mitu G. Gulati Mr., Daniel L. Chen Dr.

Guy-Uriel E. Charles Mr.

The appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court in 2009 was criticized as sacrificing merit on the altar of identity politics. According to critics, Sotomayor was simply “not that smart”. For some conservative critics, her selection illustrated the costs of affirmative action policies, in that this particular choice was going to produce a lower quality Supreme Court. For liberal critics, many were concerned that the President, by selecting Sotomayor, was squandering an opportunity to appoint an intellectual counterweight to conservative justices like Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and John Roberts. Using a set of basic measures of judicial merit, such …

We The People: The Consent Of The Governed In The 21st Century: The People’S Unalienable Right To Make Law., George A. Nation Iii

George A Nation III

My article argues in favor of federal direct democracy. Congress should recognize and facilitate the People’s right to make law via the tools of direct democracy (the initiative and referendum) at the federal level. Arguably, the national People already have this right though they have never used it. What is needed is the establishment of a clear process for the People to follow when exercising this right.

In the United States today the consent of the governed, on which the strength of our democracy depends, is weaker and more diluted than it needs to be or than it should be. …

"Systemic Poverty As A Cause Of Recessions", Robert Ashford

Robert Ashford

This article argues that the failure to address and ameliorate systemic poverty is a major cause of recessions. Recessions occur (and sub-optimal employment and growth persist) when a critical mass of market participants come to believe that the distribution of future earning capacity is not sufficient to purchase what can be produced despite the physical and technological capacity to employ available labor and capital to produce more over the same period even at lower unit cost. The essence of systemic poverty is widespread inadequate earning capacity. In recessionary periods, with rising unemployment, the problem of inadequate earning capacity (which perennially …

Why Do Citizens Litigate Over The Posting Of The Ten Commandments?, Ross Astoria

Ross Astoria

In recent years the federal courts have experienced an increase in litigation over a state’s display of the Decalogue. Common explanations for this increase in litigation refer to general political and sociological categories, such as “fundamentalism” and “urbanization,” while abstracting from the actual intentions of individuals attempting to display the Decalogue. To identify these intentions, I provide a detailed case study of three instances of pro-Decalogue advocacy in Tennessee. In this case study, pro-Decalogue advocates situate their political efforts within a narrative of American decline. This narrative is a jeremiad in which the Supreme Court is the origin and agent …

Voice Without Say: Why More Capitalist Firms Are Not (Genuinely) Participatory, Justin Schwartz

Justin Schwartz

Why are most capitalist enterprises of any size organized as authoritarian bureaucracies rather than incorporating genuinely employee participation that would give the workers real authority? Even firms with employee participation programs leave virtually all decision making power in the hands of management. The standard answer is that hierarchy is more economically efficient than any sort of genuine participation, so that participatory firms would be less productive or efficient and lose out to more traditional competitors. This answer is indefensible. After surveying the history, legal status, and varieties of employee participation, I examine and reject as question-begging the argument that the …

Spatial Diversity, Nicholas Stephanopoulos

Nicholas Stephanopoulos

Why do Supreme Court opinions denounce some districts as political gerrymanders but say nothing about other superficially similar districts? Why does the Court deem some majority-minority districts unnecessary under the Voting Rights Act, or even unconstitutional, but uphold other apparently analogous districts? This Article introduces a concept -- “spatial diversity” -- that helps explain these and many other election law oddities. Spatial diversity refers to the variation of a given factor over geographic space. For example, a district with a normal income distribution is spatially diverse, with respect to earnings, if most rich people live in one area and most …

The Ballot As A Bulwark: The Impact Of Felony Disenfranchisement On Recidivism, Guy P. Hamilton-Smith, Matt Vogel

Guy P Hamilton-Smith

Felony disenfranchisement – the exclusion of individuals convicted of felonies from the voting rolls – is a practice that is commonplace in the United States. In 2010, approximately 5.3 million Americans were ineligible to vote because of a prior felony conviction. Despite the fact that the justifications for disenfranchisement in a democratic society could be characterized as dubious, disenfranchisement has withstood various legal challenges and remains a widespread practice in almost every state. One argument which has never been examined empirically is the notion that disenfranchisement hampers efforts to rehabilitate offenders, which is what this article does. First, this article …

It Ain’T Necessarily So: The Misuse Of “Human Nature” In Law And Social Policy And The Bankruptcy Of The “Nature-Nuture” Debate, Justin Schwartz

Justin Schwartz

Debate about legal and policy reform has been haunted by a pernicious confusion about human nature, the idea that it is a set of rigid dispositions, today generally conceived as genetic, that is manifested the same way in all circumstances. Opponents of egalitarian alternatives argue that we cannot depart far from the status quo because human nature stands in the way. Advocates of such reforms too often deny the existence of human nature because, sharing this conception, they think it would prevent changes they deem desirable. Both views rest on deep errors about what it is to have a nature …

Standing At The Crossroads: A Review Of The Novel Issues Of Standing At Play In Perry V. Schwarzenegger, Natasha Mennecke

Natasha Mennecke

This piece examines whether the Proponents of Proposition 8 have standing to appeal the district court's decision invalidating the measure. The paper examines the question of federal Article III standing and whether California Law creates a Liberty Interest sufficient for federal standing.

Let Charities Speak: 501(C)(3) Charitable Organizations After Citizens United, Paul D. Weitzel

Paul D. Weitzel

This paper argues that tax deductible charities have a constitutional right to speak about politics. 501(c)(3) organizations include all tax deductible charities, including religious groups. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission abrogated the ban on political speech by 501(c)(3) organizations by rejecting the reasoning in Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington. Regan found that 501(c)(3) organizations could be prohibited from speaking because they would still be able to speak through affiliate organizations. Citizens United rejected this argument when applied to for-profit corporations, and that reasoning applies equally to non-profit organizations. Citizens United also rejected the distinction between subsidies and …

The Family Smoking Prevention And Tobacco Control Act: Legislation Passed By Congress Or The Tobacco Companies?, Sakineh A. Majd

Sakineh A. Majd

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (“the Act”) was passed by the 111th Congress in June 2009. Granting the FDA substantial authority to regulate tobacco products and how they are marketed, the Act has the power to define the future of the tobacco industry in America, and its passage did not go uncontested. Philip Morris was in support, while competing tobacco firms Reynolds and Lorillard were opposed. With the Act’s controversial passage came accusations that the senators of the 111th Congress voted according to the agendas of the tobacco firms that they were beholden to. I argue that …

Dr. King’S Speech: Surveying The Landscape Of Law And Justice In The Speeches, Sermons, And Writings Of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Carlton Waterhouse

Carlton Waterhouse

ABSTRACT The belief that an essential relationship exists between law and justice has been recognized since the time of the ancient Greeks. In fact, the concept extends well beyond Western philosophy and jurisprudence. Distinct from other aspects of justice, the relationship between law and justice considers the nature of law and its dictates as well as the responsibility of citizens to obey it. Although Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lacked the developed legal analysis of jurisprudence scholars, he made a meaningful contribution to the intellectual discourse of his time by forcing the discussion on the broader society and centering it …

Fantasyscotus: Crowdsourcing A Prediction Market For The Supreme Court, Josh Blackman, Adam Aft, Corey Carpenter

Josh Blackman

Every year the Supreme Court of the United States captivates the minds and curiosity of millions of Americans - yet the inner-workings of the Court are not fully transparent. The Court, without explanation, only decides the cases it wishes. They deliberate and assign authorship in private. The Justices hear oral arguments, and without notice, issue an opinion months later. They sometimes offer enigmatic clues during oral arguments through their questions. Between arguments and the day the Court issues an opinion, the outcome of a case is essentially a mystery. Sometimes the outcome falls along predictable lines; other times the outcome …

Is There An Efficient Antitrust Approach To Health Care?, Kathryn Ciano

Kathryn Ciano

As American states and the federal government wrestle to find a solution to health care reform, some regulators are looking towards antitrust laws in the international marketplace to govern domestic health care policy. Antitrust principles dictate that antitrust authorities must intervene only when pressures become so great as to interfere with the very operations of the market. Pharmaceutical and health care markets rely on free trade and competitive global cooperation, so there is no efficient antitrust approach to health care.

Religious Exemption Statutes: Betrayest Thou Me With A Statute?, Shirley D. Howell

Shirley D. Howell

This Article analyzes the causal connection between religious treatment exemption statutes and child deaths. Further, the Article develops a nexus between partial immunity statutes and wrongful prosecutions of religious parents

Case-By-Case Adjudication And The Path Of The Law, Anthony Niblett

Anthony Niblett

How can a centrist president or governor best influence law through the appointment of judges? Imagine that there are two sitting judges and one of the positions becomes vacant. The other, veteran judge is on the extreme right, from the perspective of the executive, and the executive prefers centrist outcomes. Should the executive appoint a centrist or, instead, appoint a left-wing extremist who might offset the sitting, right-wing judge? Conventional wisdom holds that judges counteract, or balance, one another; that is, a left-wing appointment carries the best hope offsetting the existing, right-wing judge. Following this intuition, a moderate appointment would …