Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (5)
- Torts (5)
- International Law (4)
- Courts (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
-
- Public Law and Legal Theory (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Organizations Law (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Accounting Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- European Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2)
- Fordham International Law Journal (1)
-
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (1)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- South Carolina Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standing In The Way Of The Ftaia: Exceptional Applications Of Illinois Brick, Jennifer Fischell
Standing In The Way Of The Ftaia: Exceptional Applications Of Illinois Brick, Jennifer Fischell
Michigan Law Review
In 1982, Congress enacted the Foreign Antitrust Trade Improvements Act (FTAIA) to resolve uncertainties about the international reach and effect of U.S. antitrust laws. Unfortunately, the FTAIA has provided more questions than answers. It has been ten years since the Supreme Court most recently interpreted the FTAIA, and crucial questions and circuit splits abound. One of these questions is how to understand the convergence of the direct purchaser rule (frequently referred to as the Illinois Brick doctrine) and the FTAIA. Under the direct purchaser rule, only those who purchase directly from antitrust violators are typically permitted to sue under section …
Pennsylvania V. Union Gas Company: The Supreme Court Employs The Wrong Means To Reach The Proper End, Christopher A. Brodman
Pennsylvania V. Union Gas Company: The Supreme Court Employs The Wrong Means To Reach The Proper End, Christopher A. Brodman
Akron Law Review
This casenote reviews the facts of Union Gas, the history of eleventh amendment jurisprudence, and the purposes of CERCLA. The note critically analyzes the Supreme Court's approach to evading eleventh amendment immunity. Finally, the note contemplates the impact of Union Gas on CERCLA and eleventh amendment law.
Loan Workouts, Superfund, And Lender Liability: De Minimis Settlements - The "Magic Bullet"?, Timothy J. Szuhaj
Loan Workouts, Superfund, And Lender Liability: De Minimis Settlements - The "Magic Bullet"?, Timothy J. Szuhaj
Akron Law Review
This article will focus on whether there is a practical solution for reconciling this clash between creditors' rights and environmental liability. In an effort to provide a tangible basis for critical analysis, the following hypothetical situation will be employed throughout this article. This hypothetical is intended to demonstrate a generic two party loan situation. Although this model may be an oversimplification, its basic assumptions adequately provide the basis for analysis.
Kayser-Roth, Joslyn, And The Problem Of Parent Corporation Liability Under Cercla, James A. King
Kayser-Roth, Joslyn, And The Problem Of Parent Corporation Liability Under Cercla, James A. King
Akron Law Review
This article examines these issues by focusing on the responsibility of parent corporations as "owners" and as "operators" under section 107 of CERCLA. The scope of the analysis is limited to corporations that participate in the management of other corporations. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the reach of the analysis is limited to the situation in which a corporation owns one hundred percent of the stock of the subsidiary.
Part I provides a general overview of the principle of limited shareholder liability as it applies to parent corporations and of its economic underpinnings. Part II reviews judicial applications of …
Toxic Torts And Workers' Compensation At The Savannah River Site: The Disparate Remedies Available To Those Who Work For Cancer And Those Who Get It For Free, Keegan B. Miller
Toxic Torts And Workers' Compensation At The Savannah River Site: The Disparate Remedies Available To Those Who Work For Cancer And Those Who Get It For Free, Keegan B. Miller
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Too Many Cooks In The Climate Change Kitchen: The Case For An Administrative Remedy For Damages Caused By Increased Greenhouse Gas Concentrations, Benjamin Reese
Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law
Recent federal and state court decisions have made clear that federal common law claims against emitters of greenhouse gases are not sustainable; however, those same courts seem to have given state common law tort claims the green light, at least if the claims are brought in the state where the polluters are located. This Note contends that such suits are not an adequate remedy for those injured by climate change because they will face nearly insurmountable barriers in state court, and because there are major policy-level drawbacks to relying on state tort law rather than a federal solution. This Note …
Examining Pay Differentials In The Legal Field, Barbara Donn, Christine Cahill, Meghan H. Mihal
Examining Pay Differentials In The Legal Field, Barbara Donn, Christine Cahill, Meghan H. Mihal
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality
This study investigates pay discrimination towards women in the legal field. Recent research has shown that a pay gap does exist in the legal field, and we show that this gap widens throughout the lawyers’ early careers. For our analysis, we focus on the pay differentials between associate level men and women at large private law firms in the United States. The data used in this study is provided by the American Bar Association and is a nationally representative data set following lawyers who began their legal career in 2000. We show that women earn less than their male counterparts …
Oil, Fire, Smoke And Mirrors: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility And Its Dangerous Precedent, Nicholas Guidi
Oil, Fire, Smoke And Mirrors: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility And Its Dangerous Precedent, Nicholas Guidi
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Deep Seabed Mining: Alternative Schemes For Protecting Developing Countries From Adverse Impacts, David Hegwood
Deep Seabed Mining: Alternative Schemes For Protecting Developing Countries From Adverse Impacts, David Hegwood
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
From Prosecutorial To Reparatory: A Valuable Post-Conflict Change Of Focus, Nancy A. Combs
From Prosecutorial To Reparatory: A Valuable Post-Conflict Change Of Focus, Nancy A. Combs
Michigan Journal of International Law
The ICC is well known in international legal circles. Indeed, everyone who knows anything about international law knows that the ICC is the acronym for the International Criminal Court, the body charged with prosecuting international crimes around the globe. Created in 2002, the ICC was intended to “put an end to impunity” for the perpetrators of international crimes” and to affirm “that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished.”1 Imagine, however, a world where the “ICC” instead was an acronym for the International Compensation Court. That is, what if the …
Repatriate . . . Then Compensate: Why The United States Owes Reparation Payments To Former Guantánamo Detainees, Cameron Bell
Repatriate . . . Then Compensate: Why The United States Owes Reparation Payments To Former Guantánamo Detainees, Cameron Bell
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
In late 2001, U.S. government officials chose Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, as the site to house the “war on terror” detainees. Since then, 779 individuals have been detained at Guantánamo. Many of the detainees have endured years of detention, cruel and degrading treatment, and for some, torture—conduct that violates well-established prohibitions against torture and inhumane treatment under both general international law and the law of war. Under these bodies of law, the United States is required to make reparation—through restitution, compensation, and satisfaction—for acts that violate its international obligations. But the United States has not offered financial compensation to any Guantánamo …
Legal Pluralism In Tort Law Theory: Balancing Instrumental Theories And Corrective Justice, Benjamin Shmueli
Legal Pluralism In Tort Law Theory: Balancing Instrumental Theories And Corrective Justice, Benjamin Shmueli
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Unified-monistic theories of tort law focus on a single goal, usually corrective justice, distributive justice, or optimal deterrence. Unlike these approaches, mixedpluralistic theories attempt to balance between various goals of tort law by integrating several of the considerations underlying these different goals. These theories of legal pluralism reflect ideological diversity, in this case between different theories of the same legal system. This Article discusses the challenge of legal pluralism to settle the possible collision between different goals of tort law within the framework of tort law theory. Starting from a position of support for the mixed-pluralistic thesis, this Article first …
International Liability And Primary Rules Of Obligation: An Application To Acid Rain In The United States And Canada, John B. Lyle
International Liability And Primary Rules Of Obligation: An Application To Acid Rain In The United States And Canada, John B. Lyle
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Valuing Control, Peter Dicola
Valuing Control, Peter Dicola
Michigan Law Review
Control over property is valuable in and of itself. Scholars have not fully recognized or explored that straightforward premise, which has profound implications for the economic analysis of property rights. A party to a property dispute may actually prefer liability-rule protection for an entitlement resting with the other party to liability-rule protection for an entitlement resting with her. This Article presents a novel economic model that determines the conditions under which that is the case—by taking account of how parties value control. The model suggests new opportunities for policymakers to resolve conflicts and to develop better information about property disputes …
Hostile Takeovers And Overreliance, Anthony Niblett
Hostile Takeovers And Overreliance, Anthony Niblett
Seattle University Law Review
Commentators have argued that employees should be compensated in the event of a hostile takeover; otherwise, the threat of such a takeover will fail to incentivize firm-specific investments by employees. Such deferred compensation is analogous to the payment of damages following a breach of contract. The analogous breach, here, is the breach of an implicit contract between management and employees. Employees trusted management to compensate them for firm-specific investments not explicitly contracted for. This Article uses a familiar result from the contract law literature: There is no measure of damages for breach of contract that can generate both efficient breach …
Remodeling Federal Medical Malpractice Act: A Possible Improvement To The Affordable Care Act, Nancy Kubasek, Tiffany Durham
Remodeling Federal Medical Malpractice Act: A Possible Improvement To The Affordable Care Act, Nancy Kubasek, Tiffany Durham
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
During the debates about healthcare reform, the Congressional Budget Office found that federal medical liability reform could drastically reduce federal budget deficits, yet political and legal scholars could not reach agreement about the best way for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to provide such reform. Instead, provisions were made to fund state level demonstration projects. The law that is considered one of the most successful models to date of conventional tort reform is the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act of California. This Article exams that legislation and discusses how we might use what can be learned from …
Emergency Takings, Brian Angelo Lee
Emergency Takings, Brian Angelo Lee
Michigan Law Review
Takings law has long contained a puzzle. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires the government to pay “just compensation” to owners of private property that the government “takes.” In ordinary circumstances, this requirement applies equally whether the property is confiscated or destroyed, and it also applies to property confiscated in emergencies. Remarkably, however, courts have repeatedly held that if the government destroys property to address an emergency, then a “necessity exception” relieves the government of any obligation to compensate the owner of the property that was sacrificed for the public good. Although the roots of this startling principle …
Justice Among The Ashes: How Government Compensation Facilities Can Bring Justice To Disaster Victims, Lindy Rouillard-Labbé
Justice Among The Ashes: How Government Compensation Facilities Can Bring Justice To Disaster Victims, Lindy Rouillard-Labbé
Fordham International Law Journal
No abstract provided.