Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Right to bear arms (3)
- Second Amendment (3)
- Guns (2)
- Right to Bear Arms (2)
- Access to information (1)
-
- Accidental deaths (1)
- Accidents (1)
- Biometric (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Common Area Caveat (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Convicts (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Death (1)
- Delaware (1)
- Dissent (1)
- District of Columbia v. Heller (1)
- District of Columbia v. Heller (Supreme Court case) (1)
- Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal courts of law (1)
- Fee jurisprudence doctrine (1)
- Fingerprint (1)
- Firearm Registration (1)
- Firearms (1)
- Firearms Ownership (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gun (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Cost To Carry: New York State’S Regulation On Firearm Registration, David D. Pelaez
The Cost To Carry: New York State’S Regulation On Firearm Registration, David D. Pelaez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Quiet Army: Felon Firearm Rights Restoration In The Fourth Circuit, Robert Luther Iii
The Quiet Army: Felon Firearm Rights Restoration In The Fourth Circuit, Robert Luther Iii
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Most states afford felons the opportunity to have their political disabilities removed or “rights restored” after they are released from incarceration. In every state within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, save Virginia, a felon’s rights are partially restored automatically upon the completion of his sentence, parole, and probation. Absent a pardon, Virginia requires the felon to petition the Governor in writing through the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth in order to obtain a partial restoration of rights. One such right that may or may not be restored upon a state-convicted felon’s …
Our Non-Originalist Right To Bear Arms, Robert Leider
Our Non-Originalist Right To Bear Arms, Robert Leider
Indiana Law Journal
District of Columbia v. Heller was a landmark, if controversial, opinion. Discussion has centered on the merits of its self-described originalist approach. Supporters praise its efforts to return to a more originalist and textualist approach to constitutional questions, whereas critics challenge the accuracy of Heller’s historical claims and criticize its departure from precedent.
This Article challenges much of the conventional wisdom about Heller, its use of originalism, and its relationship to nineteenth- and twentieth-century case law. This Article argues that, despite much of its rhetoric, Heller actually exemplified popular constitutionalism—not originalism—in the way it approached the most important practical question …
Constitutional Law—Shooting Blanks: Smart Gun Mandates And Their Concomitant Constitutional, Regulatory, Public Policy, And Practical Issues, William F. Godbold Iv
Constitutional Law—Shooting Blanks: Smart Gun Mandates And Their Concomitant Constitutional, Regulatory, Public Policy, And Practical Issues, William F. Godbold Iv
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution And The Individual Right To Possess Firearms: A Different Take, David W. Wise
The Constitution And The Individual Right To Possess Firearms: A Different Take, David W. Wise
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Will It Take? Terrorism, Mass Murder, Gang Violence, And Suicides: The American Way, Or Do We Strive For A Better Way?, Katherine L. Record, Lawrence O. Gostin
What Will It Take? Terrorism, Mass Murder, Gang Violence, And Suicides: The American Way, Or Do We Strive For A Better Way?, Katherine L. Record, Lawrence O. Gostin
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The assertion that access to firearms makes us safe, rather than increases the likelihood that oneself or a family member will die, is contradicted by a large body of evidence. Gunshots kill more than 30,000 Americans each year. Homicide accounts for approximately one-third of these deaths, with the remainder involving suicides and accidental gun discharges. In fact, firearms put us at greater risk of death than participating in war; in four months, as many Americans were shot dead in the United States as have died fighting in Iraq for an entire decade. Given these grim statistics, it would be reasonable …
The Tools Of Political Dissent: A First Amendment Guide To Gun Registries, Thomas E. Kadri
The Tools Of Political Dissent: A First Amendment Guide To Gun Registries, Thomas E. Kadri
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
On December 23, 2012, a newspaper in upstate New York published a provocative map. On it appeared the names and addresses of thousands of gun owners in nearby counties, all precisely pinpointed for the world to browse. The source of this information: publicly available data drawn from the state’s gun registry. Legislators were quick to respond. Within a month, a new law offered gun owners the chance to permanently remove their identities from the registry with a simple call to their county clerk. The map raised interesting questions about broadcasting personal information, but a more fundamental question remains: Are these …
More Guns: More Or Less Violence? , Bonnie Peters
More Guns: More Or Less Violence? , Bonnie Peters
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Online Gun Marketplace And The Dangerous Loophole In The National Instant Background Check System, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 757 (2014), Ann Daniels
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Attention Gun-Rights Advocates! Don't Forget The Illinois Constitutional Right To Keep And Bear Arms, 48 J. Marshall L. Rev. 53 (2014), James Leven
UIC Law Review
This Article will show that Kalodimos’s reasoning is deeply flawed and also that developments in the law following that decision demonstrate that it is no longer viable.
Second Amendment Decision Rules, Non-Lethal Weapons, And Self-Defense, A.J. Peterman
Second Amendment Decision Rules, Non-Lethal Weapons, And Self-Defense, A.J. Peterman
Marquette Law Review
General public debate about the Second Amendment has focused almost exclusively on the regulation of firearms. After Heller and McDonald, the scope of the Second Amendment’s protection has been hotly contested. One area of the Second Amendment that has been less discussed is the decisional rules that would govern non-firearms and levels of protection based on location. This Comment proposes two Second Amendment Constitutional decisional rules. Broadly, this Comment suggests that the “common use” test for “arms” should be modified for the development of new arms, such as non-lethal weapons, that are subject to the Second Amendment. The proposed …
Doe V. Wilmington Housing Authority: The Common Area Caveat As A Paradigmatic Balance Between Tenant Safety And Second Amendment Rights, Iyen Acosta
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.