Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
What Trademark Law Could Learn From Employment Law, 12 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 118 (2012), Robert A. Kearney
What Trademark Law Could Learn From Employment Law, 12 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 118 (2012), Robert A. Kearney
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Trademark litigation is as unpredictable as it is expensive. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) considers as many as thirteen different factors when evaluating whether a trademark causes a “likelihood of confusion.” Federal courts use many of the same factors, though which factors are chosen differ by jurisdiction, and, do not necessarily overlap with the Board. Further, a party can litigate for a time before the Board, then in federal court, and then back before the Board. And, if this were not enough, the Board’s decisions have little if any preclusive effect on the court, and, a court’s decision …
Summary Plan Descriptions After Amara, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 811 (2012), David Pratt
Summary Plan Descriptions After Amara, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 811 (2012), David Pratt
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court And The Department Of Labor May Dispel Myths About Erisa's Family Law Provisions And Protect The Benefit Entitlements That Arise Thereunder, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 635 (2012), Albert Feuer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Is The Correct Standard Of Prudence In Employer Stock Cases?, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 541 (2012), José Martin Jara
What Is The Correct Standard Of Prudence In Employer Stock Cases?, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 541 (2012), José Martin Jara
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Battling Ptsd: Getting Reservists Suffering From Ptsd Back To Work Through Proposed Amendments To Userra And Va Disability Compensation Benefits, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1201 (2012), Jeremiah Stephan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Past, Present, And Future Of Supreme Court Jurisprudence On Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxv (2012), Colleen E. Medill
Foreword: The Past, Present, And Future Of Supreme Court Jurisprudence On Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxv (2012), Colleen E. Medill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medical Provider Claims: Standing, Assignments, And Erisa Preemption, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 861 (2012), Kevin Wiggins
Medical Provider Claims: Standing, Assignments, And Erisa Preemption, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 861 (2012), Kevin Wiggins
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Fills A Gaping Hole: Cigna Corp. V. Amara Clarifies The Scope Of Equitable Relief Under Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (2012), Susan Harthill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Purpose Over Formality: Putting An End To The Catch-22 Preventing Workers From Speaking Up About Erisa Benefit Abuse, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 893 (2012), Lucas Walker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.