Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Withholding Injunctions In Copyright Cases: Impacts Of Ebay, Pamela Samuelson
Withholding Injunctions In Copyright Cases: Impacts Of Ebay, Pamela Samuelson
William & Mary Law Review
Before the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., which ruled that courts should exercise equitable discretion when considering whether to issue permanent injunctions in patent infringement cases, courts routinely granted injunctions in copyright cases when plaintiffs proved that defendants had infringed or had likely infringed copyrights. Such findings triggered presumptions of irreparable harm, which were almost never rebutted. Only rarely would courts consider a balancing of hardships or effects of injunctions on public interests.
In the first several years after eBay, commentators reported that eBay had had little impact on the availability of injunctive …
The Morality Of Fiduciary Law, Paul B. Miller
The Morality Of Fiduciary Law, Paul B. Miller
William & Mary Law Review
Recent work of fiduciary theory has provided conceptual synthesis requisite to understanding core fiduciary principles and the structure of fiduciary liability. However, normative questions have received only sporadic attention. What values animate fiduciary law? How does, or should, fiduciary law prove responsive to them?
While in other areas of private law theory—notably, tort theory— pioneering scholars went directly at normative questions like these, fiduciary theory has been exceptional in the reticence shown toward them. The reticence is sensible. Fiduciary principles are the product of equity’s most extended and convoluted program of supplementing surrounding law. They span several distinct forms of …
Equal Liberty In Proportion, Joshua E. Weishart
Equal Liberty In Proportion, Joshua E. Weishart
William & Mary Law Review
As federal law continues to devolve more education policy making to states, state courts will remain a primary forum for settling education rights. State fora do not inspire confidence, however, because their doctrine is so uncertain. A majority of state supreme courts do not specify a level of scrutiny and at times seem to be improvising judicial review. The resulting decisions can exhibit a troubling lack of foresight. Most notably, while federal doctrine increasingly reveals the interrelation of liberty and equality claims, state courts have failed to capitalize on that point—even though their decisions were among the first to concede …
New Nations And The International Custom, S. Prakash Sinha
New Nations And The International Custom, S. Prakash Sinha
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Handbook Of Virginia Rules Of Equity Practice And Procedure, Thomas D. Terry
Book Review Of Handbook Of Virginia Rules Of Equity Practice And Procedure, Thomas D. Terry
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.