Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ai, Artists, And Anti-Moral Rights, Derek E. Bambauer, Robert W. Woods
Ai, Artists, And Anti-Moral Rights, Derek E. Bambauer, Robert W. Woods
UF Law Faculty Publications
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used to imitate the distinctive characteristics of famous artists, such as their voice, likeness, and style. In response, legislators have introduced bills in Congress that would confer moral rights protections, such as control over attribution and integrity, upon artists. This Essay argues such measures are almost certain to fail because of deep-seated, pervasive hostility to moral rights measures in U.S. intellectual property law. It analyses both legislative measures and judicial decisions that roll back moral rights, and explores how copyright’s authorship doctrines manifest a latent hostility to these entitlements. The Essay concludes with …
The Use Of Ai-Based Technologies In Arbitrating Trust Disputes, Lee-Ford Tritt
The Use Of Ai-Based Technologies In Arbitrating Trust Disputes, Lee-Ford Tritt
UF Law Faculty Publications
An important debate has emerged concerning the potential application of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") to the arbitration decision-making process. At issue in this debate is the proper role, if any, of AI in rendering binding decisions. Although, to date, AI is not sufficiently developed to replace human arbitrators in making binding decisions, this has not stopped academics, judges, and practitioners from engaging in heated discourse on the topic. Yet, fervent participants on both sides of this debate have confined the parameters of this discussion to arbitration generically, neglecting any application to specific disciplines of law. Insights from these discussions have limited …
Assuming The Risks Of Artificial Intelligence, Amy L. Stein
Assuming The Risks Of Artificial Intelligence, Amy L. Stein
UF Law Faculty Publications
Tort law has long served as a remedy for those injured by products—and injuries from artificial intelligence (“AI”) are no exception. While many scholars have rightly contemplated the possible tort claims involving AI-driven technologies that cause injury, there has been little focus on the subsequent analysis of defenses. One of these defenses, assumption of risk, has been given particularly short shrift, with most scholars addressing it only in passing. This is intriguing, particularly because assumption of risk has the power to completely bar recovery for a plaintiff who knowingly and voluntarily engaged with a risk. In reality, such a defense …