Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (5)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Business (2)
- Computer Engineering (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
-
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Engineering (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- American Politics (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Education (1)
- Education Economics (1)
- Education Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Keyword
-
- Editorial Board (4)
- Masthead (4)
- TOC (4)
- Table of Contents (4)
- Legal ethics (2)
-
- Professional responsibility (2)
- UNH Law Review (2)
- University of New Hampshire School of Law (2)
- "takings clause" "fifth amendment" (1)
- Attorney-client privilege (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Bargaining (1)
- Brady (1)
- Business (1)
- Campaign (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Contribution (1)
- Copyright notice (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Courts (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Donation (1)
- Education (1)
- Finance (1)
- Foreclosure (1)
- Free (1)
- Funding (1)
- Harmful conduct (1)
- Housing (1)
- Insurance (1)
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
Table Of Contents, Volume 15, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
Table Of Contents, Volume 15, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Table of Contents for Volume 15, Issue Number One.
Unconventional Methods For A Traditional Setting: The Use Of Virtual Reality To Reduce Implicit Racial Bias In The Courtroom, Natalie Salmanowitz
Unconventional Methods For A Traditional Setting: The Use Of Virtual Reality To Reduce Implicit Racial Bias In The Courtroom, Natalie Salmanowitz
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
The presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial lie at the core of the United States justice system. While existing rules and practices serve to uphold these principles, the administration of justice is significantly compromised by a covert but influential factor: namely, implicit racial biases. These biases can lead to automatic associations between race and guilt, as well as impact the way in which judges and jurors interpret information throughout a trial. Despite the well-documented presence of implicit racial biases, few steps have been taken to ameliorate the problem in the courtroom setting. This Article discusses the …
Plea Bargaining And Prosecutorial Motives, Charlie Gerstein
Plea Bargaining And Prosecutorial Motives, Charlie Gerstein
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
This Article argues that the structure of the plea-bargaining system—which the Supreme Court recently recognized “is the criminal justice system”—hinges on something previously unappreciated by scholars and unaddressed in criminal procedure doctrine: prosecutors’ motives. This Article addresses that problem by studying the prosecutor’s disclosure obligations when defendants plead guilty. Courts and commentators have been divided for years over whether Brady v. Maryland applies when defendants plead guilty. But the current split blinds us to more important, and more vexing, aspects of the problem. The fact is, there already is a disclosure obligation, albeit a hidden one. Armed with an …
The Compatibility Of Forward-Looking And Backward-Looking Accounts Of Tort Law, Michael Pressman
The Compatibility Of Forward-Looking And Backward-Looking Accounts Of Tort Law, Michael Pressman
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
This Article is the first to argue that forward-looking and backward-looking accounts of tort law are intrinsically compatible with one another. This theoretical point is of great importance and will bring about a paradigm shift in tort theory—and, more generally, in legal theory. This is because the long-standing debate between corrective justice theorists and economic theorists about the purpose of tort law (with active participants including Posner, Calabresi, Coleman, Weinrib, Rawls, and countless others) is based on the universal assumption that forward-looking and backward-looking accounts of tort law are incompatible. This assumption, however, is false, and this Article explains why …
Taking Stock: Why The Supreme Court’S Decision To Apply The Market-Value Standard In Horne Ii Further Complicates The Just Compensation Requirement, Greg Seidner
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause does not prevent the federal (or a state) government from taking private property. It merely sets as a condition that the government pay the owner “just compensation” for the taking. Precisely what constitutes just compensation, however, is a tricky matter. One method for determining just compensation is the “market-value” method, which requires the government to pay the owner the property’s market value. But where a taking is only partial, that is, where the government takes only a portion of private property, the property that remains with the owner may see an increase or decrease in …
Masthead, Volume 15, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
Masthead, Volume 15, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Masthead for Volume 15, Issue Number One.
The Results Of Deliberation, Maggie Wittlin
The Results Of Deliberation, Maggie Wittlin
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
When evaluating whether to sue, prosecute, settle, or plead, trial lawyers must predict the future—they need to estimate how likely they are to win a given case in a given jurisdiction. Social scientists have used mock juror studies to produce a vast body of literature showing how different variables influence juror decision making. But few of these studies account for jury deliberation, so they present an impoverished picture of how these effects play out in trials and are of limited usefulness.
This Article helps lawyers better predict the future by presenting a novel computer model that extrapolates findings about jurors …
Table Of Contents, Volume 14, Number Two, 2016
Table Of Contents, Volume 14, Number Two, 2016
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Table of Contents for Volume 14, Issue Number Two.
Masthead, Volume 14, Number Two, 2016
Masthead, Volume 14, Number Two, 2016
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Masthead for Volume 14, Issue Number Two.
Heart Of Darkness: New Hampshire Campaign Finance Law Since Citizens United, Jay Surdowski
Heart Of Darkness: New Hampshire Campaign Finance Law Since Citizens United, Jay Surdowski
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “Perhaps one of the greatest election law paradoxes in the United States is that New Hampshire—the First in the Nation Presidential Primary State—a State whose citizenry famously prides itself on political engagement—is also a State with some of the most complicated and sporadically enforced campaign finance laws in any jurisdiction. The post-Citizens United world, wherein vast quantities of unlimited and anonymous corporate and individual donations by some of the wealthiest citizens are freely flowing (so-called “Dark Money” because the identities of donors are shielded by law), has only exacerbated the loud creaks of the rickety campaign finance law firmament …
The Non-Uniform Commercial Code: The Creeping, Problematic Application Of Article 9 To Determine Outcomes In Foreclosure Cases, Morgan L. Weinstein
The Non-Uniform Commercial Code: The Creeping, Problematic Application Of Article 9 To Determine Outcomes In Foreclosure Cases, Morgan L. Weinstein
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “This article will discuss the operation of two portions of the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”) on mortgage foreclosure law. Article 3 of the U.C.C. governs negotiable instruments, whereas Article 9 governs secured transactions. For decades, courts have utilized Article 3 to determine the rights of lenders and their assigns to enforce mortgage promissory notes and to foreclose mortgages thereon. However, certain jurisdictions do not utilize the U.C.C. in foreclosure cases, whereas other jurisdictions have recently begun to look to Article 9 instead. This article argues that the Uniform Commercial Code should receive more uniform application, with Article 3 as …
The Arc And Architecture Of Private Enforcement Regimes In The United States And Europe: A View Across The Atlantic, Jason Rathod, Sandeep Veheesan
The Arc And Architecture Of Private Enforcement Regimes In The United States And Europe: A View Across The Atlantic, Jason Rathod, Sandeep Veheesan
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
The United States and Europe have traditionally taken very different approaches to the regulation of harmful conduct. Previously, European nations relied almost entirely on the public enforcement of laws, whereas the United States relied on a mix of public and private actors. In the United States, private rights of action have played a central role deterring illegal conduct—and, in fact, provided greater deterrence than public enforcers in some areas of law. They have also allowed injured parties to obtain compensation. Despite their very different histories, the private enforcement systems in the United States and Europe are showing signs of convergence …
Incitement, Threats, And Constitutional Guarantees: First Amendment Protections Pre- And Post-Elonis, Mark Strasser
Incitement, Threats, And Constitutional Guarantees: First Amendment Protections Pre- And Post-Elonis, Mark Strasser
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] "While the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of expression, individuals issuing threats or advocating illegal conduct may be subject to punishment. What constitutes proscribable speech has long been evolving, and the recent jurisprudence suggests that First Amendment protections are more robust for advocacy of illegal conduct than for threats. Elonis v. United States provided the Court with a golden opportunity to clarify First Amendment threat jurisprudence; however, those hoping for an illuminating analysis cannot help but be disappointed. Part I of this Article discusses the developing First Amendment jurisprudence regarding the regulation of incitement, …
Claremont I And Ii - Were They Rightly Decided, And Where Have They Left Us?, John M. Lewis, Stephen E. Borofsky
Claremont I And Ii - Were They Rightly Decided, And Where Have They Left Us?, John M. Lewis, Stephen E. Borofsky
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “Our children embody the enduring wonder of life. They hold our hopes for the future. We want them to be happy, to succeed in whatever they do both in work and in play. We want them to contribute to our country and the world in constructive ways.
But for these hopes to be realized our children must be educated-they must possess the requisite skills and knowledge to function well in this ever changing world. Yet, are we, as a society, meeting our responsibility to educate our children? What do we expect of our public schools? How important are these …
Table Of Contents, Volume 14, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
Table Of Contents, Volume 14, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Table of Contents for Volume 14, Issue Number One.
The Battle To Define The Scope Of Attorney-Client Privilege In The Context Of Insurance Company Bad Faith: A Judicial War Zone, Steven Plitt, Joshua D. Rogers
The Battle To Define The Scope Of Attorney-Client Privilege In The Context Of Insurance Company Bad Faith: A Judicial War Zone, Steven Plitt, Joshua D. Rogers
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] "The attorney-client privilege is the "oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law."' The privilege is "[d]eeply rooted in public policy," and plays a 'vital role' in the administration of justice." As such, the privilege is "traditionally deemed worthy of maximum legal protection"' and "it remains one of the most carefully guarded privileges and is not readily to be whittled down." The privilege has come under assault in the insurance bad faith context in recent decades resulting in a "whittling down" of the privilege for insurance companies as a target party. Over the past couple …
Masthead, Volume 14, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
Masthead, Volume 14, Number 1, 2016, Editorial Board
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Masthead for Volume 14, Issue Number One.
Is Pro Bono Practice In Legal “Backwaters” Beyond The Scope Of The Model Rules?, Barbara Graves-Poller
Is Pro Bono Practice In Legal “Backwaters” Beyond The Scope Of The Model Rules?, Barbara Graves-Poller
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] "While many private sector attorneys offer pro bono legal services that reflect the same level of diligence and skill characteristic of the work done on behalf of their paying clients, the egregious failures described in the MC v. GC case and those that occur in many unreported matters highlight the dangers of pro bono initiatives designed to bridge the “access to justice gap.” As used here, the term “justice gap” refers to the chasm between the need for legal representation in civil disputes and public interest attorneys available to serve poor and working class clients. Justice gap pro bono …
Table Of Contents, Volume 13, Number 2, 2015, Editorial Board
Table Of Contents, Volume 13, Number 2, 2015, Editorial Board
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Table of Contents for Volume 13, Issue Number Two.
Masthead, Volume 13, Number 2, 2016, Editorial Board
Masthead, Volume 13, Number 2, 2016, Editorial Board
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
Masthead for Volume 13, Issue Number Two.
A 21st Century Approach To Personal Jurisdiction, Robert E. Pfeffer
A 21st Century Approach To Personal Jurisdiction, Robert E. Pfeffer
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] "Personal jurisdiction doctrine plays a major role in many civil disputes in the United States. When the defendant resides in, is incorporated or headquartered in (in the case of a corporation or other business), or is otherwise found in the particular state where suit is brought, personal jurisdiction generally is found to exist and is unproblematic. Major personal jurisdiction issues usually arise when a plaintiff sues the defendant in a state other than the one in which the defendant is located.
In many cases involving parties located in different states, where a suit takes place is as extensively litigated …
Reversal By Recusal? Comer V. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc. And The Needfor Mandatory Judicial Recusal Statements, Patrick A. Woods
Reversal By Recusal? Comer V. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc. And The Needfor Mandatory Judicial Recusal Statements, Patrick A. Woods
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] "In many cases, if not most, voluntary judicial recusal is both an efficient use of judicial resources and an exceptional safeguard to the legitimacy of the federal judiciary. However, voluntary judicial recusal poses its own unique problems when the withdrawing judge declines to issue a statement explaining the statutory grounds for his or her recusal. Unlike when a party seeks to disqualify a judge by motion—where the reasons for recusal will, at a minimum, be set out in the motion papers—when a judge voluntarily recuses, there is not necessarily any record created as to the reasons for the recusal. …