Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Scholarly Works

Series

2008

Government and politics

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Second Panel: Labor Markets, Income Inequality And Globalization, Fran Ansley Jul 2008

Second Panel: Labor Markets, Income Inequality And Globalization, Fran Ansley

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


Judicial Campaign Oversight Committees' Complaint Handling In The 2006 Elections: Survey And Recommendations, Penny White Apr 2008

Judicial Campaign Oversight Committees' Complaint Handling In The 2006 Elections: Survey And Recommendations, Penny White

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


Conceptualizing Intimate Violence And Gender Equality: A Comparative Approach, Valorie K. Vojdik Jan 2008

Conceptualizing Intimate Violence And Gender Equality: A Comparative Approach, Valorie K. Vojdik

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


"The Appeal" To The Masses, Penny White Jan 2008

"The Appeal" To The Masses, Penny White

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


Doing Policy From Below: Worker Solidarity And The Prospects For Immigration Reform, Fran Ansley Jan 2008

Doing Policy From Below: Worker Solidarity And The Prospects For Immigration Reform, Fran Ansley

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


Educating Workers About Labor Rights And Global Wrongs Through Documentary Film, Fran Ansley Jan 2008

Educating Workers About Labor Rights And Global Wrongs Through Documentary Film, Fran Ansley

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


A Response To Professor Fitzpatrick: The Rest Of The Story, Penny White Jan 2008

A Response To Professor Fitzpatrick: The Rest Of The Story, Penny White

Scholarly Works

In his essay Election as Appointment: The Tennessee Plan Reconsidered, Professor Brian T. Fitzpatrick contends that Tennessee's selection and retention method for appellate court judges is both unconstitutional and unmeritorious. This Essay responds to those claims. Part I will respond to Professor Fitzpatrick's claim that the Tennessee Plan is unconstitutional; Part II will respond to his claim that the Plan is not fulfilling the purposes which led the Tennessee legislature, in its wisdom, to adopt it.