Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

SMU Law Review

2009

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Fourth Amendment - Search And Seizure: The Seventh Circuit Holds That Evidence Obtained In A Warrantless Search Of A Home May Be Used Against A Present And Objecting Occupant After They Are Arrested And Removed From The Home And Co-Occupant With Authority, Amanda Dodds Jan 2009

Fourth Amendment - Search And Seizure: The Seventh Circuit Holds That Evidence Obtained In A Warrantless Search Of A Home May Be Used Against A Present And Objecting Occupant After They Are Arrested And Removed From The Home And Co-Occupant With Authority, Amanda Dodds

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Conflict Of Laws, Stephanie K. Marshall, Wm. Frank Carroll, James P. George Jan 2009

Conflict Of Laws, Stephanie K. Marshall, Wm. Frank Carroll, James P. George

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Health Care Law, Tara Kepler, Lewis A. Lefko, Thomas Wm. Mayo Jan 2009

Health Care Law, Tara Kepler, Lewis A. Lefko, Thomas Wm. Mayo

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Brief Remarks On The Supreme Court's Role After 9/11: Continuing The Legal Conversation In The War On Terror, Anthony J. Colangelo Jan 2009

Brief Remarks On The Supreme Court's Role After 9/11: Continuing The Legal Conversation In The War On Terror, Anthony J. Colangelo

SMU Law Review

In thinking about what I might say on the topic of civil liberties after 9/11, an idea that occurred to me was to give a snapshot of the Supreme Court's role in the perceived tug-of-war between national security and individual rights, arising out of the "war on terror." How has the Court responded to the government's positions? And in what ways has it attempted to strike the proper balance under the Constitution?

The Supreme Court decisions are long and, at points, exceedingly technical. But I think there are a couple of themes we can pull out, and in doing so, …


Consumer Welfare And Group Boycott Law, C. Paul Rogers Iii Jan 2009

Consumer Welfare And Group Boycott Law, C. Paul Rogers Iii

SMU Law Review

If a showing of consumer harm is now to be required for (1) the per se rule and/or (2) a finding of unreasonableness under the rule of reason, it would appear that a good deal of boycott precedent is effectively overruled. But if it isn't, should it be, or is there any reason why an exception to the consumer welfare model should be carved out for some kinds of boycotts? Should prior cases be ignored or overruled? And how are lower federal courts now dealing with the question of consumer harm in concerted refusal to deal cases, given the paucity …


Remembering Judge Sanders: Judicial Pragmatism In The Court Of First And Last Resort, Maureen N. Armour Jan 2009

Remembering Judge Sanders: Judicial Pragmatism In The Court Of First And Last Resort, Maureen N. Armour

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Foreword--Antitrust Law And Policy: Still Under Construction, C. Paul Rogers Iii Jan 2009

Foreword--Antitrust Law And Policy: Still Under Construction, C. Paul Rogers Iii

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.