Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Missouri Law Review

Confidentiality

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Caught Between A Rock And A Hard Place: Harmonizing Victim Confidentiality Rights With Children's Best Interests, Lauren E. Parsonage Jun 2005

Caught Between A Rock And A Hard Place: Harmonizing Victim Confidentiality Rights With Children's Best Interests, Lauren E. Parsonage

Missouri Law Review

In State ex rel. Hope House, Inc. v. Merrigan, the Missouri Supreme Court examined Missouri Revised Statutes Section 210.140, 5 which eliminates legally recognized privileged communications where there is evidence of child abuse or neglect, and attempted to resolve it with Section 455.220,6 which establishes strict confidentiality for residents of domestic violence shelters. 7 Although Section 210.140 has previously been the subject of litigation, this case was the first time the court concurrently dealt with Section 455.220 and attempted to harmonize two conflicting statutes that ultimately could have a tremendous effect on the children involved. This Note will examine the …


Promises Of Confidentiality: Do Reporters Really Have To Keep Their Word, Harold B. Oakley Jun 1992

Promises Of Confidentiality: Do Reporters Really Have To Keep Their Word, Harold B. Oakley

Missouri Law Review

In an industry in which information is the ultimate commodity, a new dilemma that confronts the media world is whether the First Amendment protects news gatherers from sources who try to enforce promises of confidentiality. The debate raised in Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. pits the First Amendment freedoms of the press and speech against concepts of contracts and torts that are deeply rooted in our legal heritage. At least two reasons make promises of confidentiality important to the newsgathering profession. First, breaking a promise of confidentiality that has induced a source to provide information is dishonorable. Second, sources may …