Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Agency - Liability Of Principal For Termination Of Agents Employment, William G. Mateer S.Ed.
Agency - Liability Of Principal For Termination Of Agents Employment, William G. Mateer S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In the summer of 1949, appellant entered into an oral contract for an indefinite time with the appellee whereby the former was granted an exclusive wholesale distributorship of appellee's farm and garden equipment. A four-year period followed in which appellant increased the number of dealers in appellee's product from four or five in 1949 to over one hundred in 1953. In the latter part of 1952 appellant contemplated an enlargement of its facilities which would require it to enter upon a fifteen-year lease. Since the lessor desired some assurances as to the duration of appellant's franchise, appellant wrote to appellee …
Corporations - Officers And Directors - Liability For Inducing A Corporation To Breach Its Contracts, William H. Leighner
Corporations - Officers And Directors - Liability For Inducing A Corporation To Breach Its Contracts, William H. Leighner
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff real estate company brought suit against the directors of a corporation and other third persons for an alleged conspiracy to induce the corporation to breach its contract with plaintiff. The complaint alleged that the corporation had entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff was to procure a purchaser for certain premises owned by the corporation and that plaintiff had found a purchaser; that before a written offer could be obtained, the corporation contracted to sell to another broker who was to be used as a conduit to transfer title to the purchaser found by the plaintiff, and who was to …
Admiralty - Jurisdiction - Quasi -Contractual Remedy, Ross Kipka S.Ed.
Admiralty - Jurisdiction - Quasi -Contractual Remedy, Ross Kipka S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioners paid money to respondent for prospective passage to Europe on his passenger vessel held out as a common carrier. When respondent failed to make the voyage or return the passage money, petitioners sued in admiralty for breach of contract. The libel was in the nature of indebitatus assumpsit for moneys had and received and wrongfully withheld by respondent. The district court held this an action based upon the breach of a maritime contract and therefore within the admiralty jurisdiction. The court of appeals reversed, on the ground that the action was in the nature of the common law indebitatus …