Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Sherman Act (3)
- Antitrust (2)
- Competition (2)
- Monopoly (2)
- Robinson-Patman Act (2)
-
- United States v. General Electric Co. (2)
- All Writs Act (1)
- Appellate jurisdiction (1)
- Big business (1)
- Borah-Van Nuys (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Court of appeals (1)
- Decree (1)
- FTC v. Morton Salt Company (1)
- Fair trade contract (1)
- Final judgment rule (1)
- Integrated manufacturing (1)
- License (1)
- Licensing (1)
- McGuire Act (1)
- Miller-Tydings Act (1)
- Miller-Tydings Amendment (1)
- Monopolistic competition (1)
- Moog Industries v. Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Nashville Milk Co. v. Carnation (1)
- Newburgh Moire Co. v. Superior Moire Co. (1)
- Patent grant-back (1)
- Patent misuse (1)
- Price differential (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Regulation Of Business - Sherman Act - Effect Of Trade-Mark On Scope Of Relevant Market, Robert H. Kapp S. Ed.
Regulation Of Business - Sherman Act - Effect Of Trade-Mark On Scope Of Relevant Market, Robert H. Kapp S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendants are American corporations marketing trade-marked toilet goods obtained from their French affiliates. In each case the French company transferred to the American company trademark rights covering imported products. Pursuant to section 526 of the Tariff Act of 1930 defendants filed with the Bureau of Customs certificates of registration of these trade-marks for the purpose of preventing the competitive importation of products bearing the same trade-marks. In an action by the government charging that utilization of section 526 by each defendant constitutes an attempt to monopolize and a monopolization of the importation and sale of these trade-marked commodities in violation …
Federal Procedure - Mandamus - Power Of Courts Of Appeal, Jerome K. Walsh, Jr. S.Ed.
Federal Procedure - Mandamus - Power Of Courts Of Appeal, Jerome K. Walsh, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In two related antitrust actions instituted in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, an order was entered under rule 53(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure referring the cases to a master for trial because of the "extremely congested calendar" then facing the court. All parties to the· action moved to vacate the order and these motions were denied by the district judge. After appearing before the master to object to the reference, the defendants petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit praying that a writ of mandamus issue to compel the district judge …
Kittelle & Lamb: Trade Association Law And Practice, H. Thomas Austern
Kittelle & Lamb: Trade Association Law And Practice, H. Thomas Austern
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Trade Association Law and Practice By George P. Lamb and Sumner S. Kittelle, assisted by Carrington Shields.
Regulation Of Business - Sherman Act - Concerted Refusals To Deal Not Illegal Per Se, Gerald D. Rapp
Regulation Of Business - Sherman Act - Concerted Refusals To Deal Not Illegal Per Se, Gerald D. Rapp
Michigan Law Review
The government sought an injunction restraining the members of an organization of independent insurance agents responsible for writing nearly 80 percent of the fire insurance in the Cleveland, Ohio, area from carrying out association regulations. Adherence to the rules was challenged as a conspiracy in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The regulations were designed to prevent the members from representing (1) mutual insurance companies, (2) branch office companies which contribute to the agents a portion of their overhead expense and, (3) insurance companies which operate branch …
Regulation Of Business - Robinson-Patman Act - Injury To Competition Between Buyers Of Auto Parts, A. Duncan Whitaker S.Ed.
Regulation Of Business - Robinson-Patman Act - Injury To Competition Between Buyers Of Auto Parts, A. Duncan Whitaker S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner manufactured and sold automobile parts to distributors who resold them to jobbers in interstate commerce. The products were classified into three lines: leaf spring line, coil action line, and piston ring line. A progressive, cumulative discount was given in each line, based upon the aggregate yearly purchases of either a single buyer or a group-buying organization. The Federal Trade Commission charged petitioner with price discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Every customer who testified at the hearing denied that he had been injured competitively by the petitioner's pricing practices. Nevertheless, in view of the substantial price differentials, the …
Regulation Of Business-Civil Actions Under Section 3 Of The Robinson-Patman Act, Richard E. Day S.Ed.
Regulation Of Business-Civil Actions Under Section 3 Of The Robinson-Patman Act, Richard E. Day S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In Nashville Milk Co. v. Carnation Co. plaintiff sought to recover treble damages and asked injunctive relief, claiming defendant had sold filled milk at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition by plaintiff in its sale of a like product in violation of section 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act. In affirming an order dismissing the complaint, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a private action may not be maintained for a violation of section 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act. That very same week, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reached a contrary …
Patents - Licensing - Legality Of Grant-Back Clauses, Eric E. Bergsten S.Ed.
Patents - Licensing - Legality Of Grant-Back Clauses, Eric E. Bergsten S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
There is no authoritative definition of the term "patent grant-back." It has been defined as a clause in a patent license which provides "for license or assignment to the licensor of any improvement patented by the licensee in the products or processes of the licensed patent." In litigated cases grant-back clauses usually appear either in basic patent licenses or in licenses of the products or processes of an industry which the licensor dominates through control of a multitude of overlapping patents.
Patents - Misues Doctrine - Multiple Licenses With Price-Fixing Provisios As Shermen Act Violation, Herbert A. Bernhard S.Ed.
Patents - Misues Doctrine - Multiple Licenses With Price-Fixing Provisios As Shermen Act Violation, Herbert A. Bernhard S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In a suit for infringement of a moire process patent, relief was denied by the trial court partially on the ground that plaintiff had misused its patent by violating section 1 of the Sherman Act. Plaintiff had licensed two other moire finishers to use the patented process. Each license contained a proviso that plaintiff could specify the prices the licensee was to charge its customers for finishing cloth with the patented process. On appeal, held, affirmed. It is a violation of the antitrust laws for a patentee to issue more than one license containing price-fixing provisions. Newburgh Moire Co. …
Edwards: Big Business And The Policy Of Competition, Carl H. Fulda
Edwards: Big Business And The Policy Of Competition, Carl H. Fulda
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Big Business and the Policy of Competition By Corwin D. Edwards.
Antitrust - Resale Price Maintenance - Legality Of Fair Trade Contracts Made By Integrated Firm, John A. Ziegler S.Ed.
Antitrust - Resale Price Maintenance - Legality Of Fair Trade Contracts Made By Integrated Firm, John A. Ziegler S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant-appellee manufactures its own brand-name line of drug products and is also the largest drug wholesaler in the United States. Its manufactured products are sold through appellee's own wholesale division and to independent wholesalers and retailers. In 1951 appellee entered into resale price maintenance contracts with these independent wholesalers, most of whom competed with appellee's wholesale divisions. The Government then brought an action for an injunction under section 4 of the Sherman Act, restraining the further use of resale price contracts by appellee on the ground that these contracts constituted illegal price fixing under section 1 of the act. The …