Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Labor Law - Right Of Employee To Sue On Collective Bargaining Contract Between Employer And Union, David Davidoff
Labor Law - Right Of Employee To Sue On Collective Bargaining Contract Between Employer And Union, David Davidoff
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a local union by the terms of which he agreed to hire only union operators, to pay them a specified wage, and to give them two weeks' notice of their discharge, or two weeks' salary in lieu thereof, should he decide to go out of business. Plaintiff, a union member, was employed by the defendant from March, 1939, until he was discharged in December, 1939. It appeared that this discharge was occasioned by defendant's sale of his theatre and retirement from the business. Plaintiff sued for …
Future Interests - Acceleration Of Contingent Remainders After Widow's Election To Take Against Will, Harry M. Nayer
Future Interests - Acceleration Of Contingent Remainders After Widow's Election To Take Against Will, Harry M. Nayer
Michigan Law Review
Testator made specific bequests in the first five items of his will, one bequest being directed to his wife. In the sixth item he gave his wife a life interest in all the property remaining after satisfying items one to five. Item seven provided for a remainder in some specific realty to a niece, and item eight provided that upon the death of the wife and after satisfying item seven, the residue of the estate was to go to five named beneficiaries and to all of his nephews and nieces "then living." The widow renounced her share under the will …
Taxation - Insurance Companies - Considerations For Annuity Contracts As "Premiums'' Received For Insurance Contracts, Michigan Law Review
Taxation - Insurance Companies - Considerations For Annuity Contracts As "Premiums'' Received For Insurance Contracts, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The defendant commissioner of insurance refused to issue to plaintiff insurance company a certificate of authority to do business in Kansas unless plaintiff paid back taxes claimed to be due on considerations received for "annuity contracts" by the plaintiff, in Kansas, between 1927 and 1938 inclusive. The tax in question was "upon all premiums" received during the year, but the plaintiff contended the word "premiums" did not include considerations received for "annuity contracts." Plaintiff brought mandamus to compel defendant commissioner to issue a certificate of authority to do business. Held, three judges dissenting, that the word "premiums" included considerations …