Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ARBITRATION (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- COMMON LAW (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- DISPUTE RESOLUTION (1)
- Economics (1)
- Empirical Legal Studies (1)
- FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT (1)
- GILMER (1)
- JUDGES (1)
- JUDICIAL REVIEW (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- MORAL HAZARD (1)
- REVISED UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT (1)
- Remedies (1)
- STATE POWERS (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Crowning The New King: The Statutory Arbitrator And The Demise Of Judicial Review, Michael H. Leroy
Crowning The New King: The Statutory Arbitrator And The Demise Of Judicial Review, Michael H. Leroy
Michael H LeRoy
Judicial review of arbitration awards is highly deferential, but when does it become rubber stamping? Using original data, I find that federal courts vacated only 4.3 percent of 162 disputed awards. Nearly the same result was observed for a sub-sample of 44 employment discrimination awards under Title VII. By comparison, federal appeals courts in 2006 reversed 12.9 percent of 5,917 rulings made by civil court judges on the merits of legal claims.
Why are the rulings of Article III judges scrutinized more than the awards of citizen-arbitrators? What does this mean when companies can avoid Article III court rulings by …
Do Courts Create Moral Hazard? When Judges Nullify Employer Liability In Arbitrations: An Empirical Analysis, Michael H. Leroy
Do Courts Create Moral Hazard? When Judges Nullify Employer Liability In Arbitrations: An Empirical Analysis, Michael H. Leroy
Michael H LeRoy
State courts are creating conditions for moral hazard in the arbitration of employment disputes. The problem begins when employers compel individuals to arbitrate their legal claims, denying them access to juries and other benefits of a trial. This empirical study identifies a disturbing trend. State courts vacated many arbitration wins for employees, but not for employers. My database has 443 federal and state court rulings from 1975-2007. Remarkably, state appellate courts confirmed only 56.4% of employee wins in arbitration. But when the same courts ruled on employer victories, they confirmed 86.7% of awards. The difference in rates was statistically significant. …