Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Program To Improve The Efficiency And Quality Of Patent Examination, Keith N. Hylton, Madisyn Lynn Richards
A Program To Improve The Efficiency And Quality Of Patent Examination, Keith N. Hylton, Madisyn Lynn Richards
Faculty Scholarship
In this article we suggest three novel amendments to U.S. patent law to increase efficiency and decrease costs. We first contend that while the assertion of invalid patents is detrimental because of anticompetitive effects, such competition concerns should place no duty upon applicants to disclose prior art at the outset. Additionally, we argue that to avoid resource waste, the USPTO should outsource prior art searches for certain applications, as in Japan. Finally, we propose a system where patentees have the option to elect to a patent box regime that reduces their taxes on patent profits substantially (e.g., from 21% to …
Jack Daniel’S And The Unfulfilled Promise Of Trademark Use, Stacey Dogan, Jessica Silbey
Jack Daniel’S And The Unfulfilled Promise Of Trademark Use, Stacey Dogan, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
In Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products, the Supreme Court announced a bright-line rule: whatever speech protections govern the use of trademarks in artistic works, no such rule applies “when an alleged infringer uses a trademark in the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.” Those who engage in “trademark use,” in other words, must face the usual likelihood-of-confusion standard, regardless of whether their use also has expressive dimensions. The Jack Daniel’s defendant conceded that it was engaged in trademark use, so the opinion did not do the hard work …
A Matter Of Facts: The Evolution Of Copyright’S Fact-Exclusion And Its Implications For Disinformation And Democracy, Jessica Silbey
A Matter Of Facts: The Evolution Of Copyright’S Fact-Exclusion And Its Implications For Disinformation And Democracy, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
The Article begins with a puzzle: the curious absence of an express fact-exclusion from copyright protection in both the Copyright Act and its legislative history despite it being a well-founded legal principle. It traces arguments in the foundational Supreme Court case (Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service) and in the Copyright Act’s legislative history to discern a basis for the fact-exclusion. That research trail produces a legal genealogy of the fact-exclusion based in early copyright common law anchored by canonical cases, Baker v. Selden, Burrow-Giles v. Sarony, and Wheaton v. Peters. Surprisingly, none of them …