Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Amicus brief (2)
- IP (2)
- Patent (2)
- Patent law (2)
- Stare decisis (2)
-
- Supreme Court (2)
- Clause (1)
- Commerce (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Dormant Commerce Clause (1)
- Due process (1)
- Export (1)
- Import-export (1)
- Interstate (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law (1)
- Multistate (1)
- Policy (1)
- Property (1)
- Public (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Quill v. North Dakota (1)
- Sales (1)
- Science (1)
- South Dakota v. Wayfair (1)
- State (1)
- Stream of export (1)
- Tax (1)
- Taxation (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief For The R Street Institute And Engine Advocacy As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Charles Duan
Brief For The R Street Institute And Engine Advocacy As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Charles Duan
Amicus Briefs
Under 35 U.S.C. § 102, an inventor may not obtain a patent on an invention that has been “on sale” for more than a year. The question is whether, from this so-called on-sale bar, certain classes of sales should be exempted— sales under a confidentiality agreement, in Petitioner’s view; and sales to those other than the ultimate customers, according to the government.
Brief For The R Street Institute And Engine Advocacy As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Charles Duan
Brief For The R Street Institute And Engine Advocacy As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Charles Duan
Amicus Briefs
Under 35 U.S.C. § 102, an inventor may not obtain a patent on an invention that has been “on sale” for more than a year. The question is whether, from this so-called on-sale bar, certain classes of sales should be exempted— sales under a confidentiality agreement, in Petitioner’s view; and sales to those other than the ultimate customers, according to the government.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Law Professors And Economists In Support Of Petitioner, Edward A. Zelinsky
Brief Of Amici Curiae Law Professors And Economists In Support Of Petitioner, Edward A. Zelinsky
Amicus Briefs
Amici are professors of tax law and economics at universities across the United States. As scholars and teachers, they have considered the economic consequences of this Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), and have concluded that Quill’s dormant Commerce Clause holding should be overruled. Amici join this brief solely on their own behalf and not as representatives of their universities. A full list of amici appears in Appendix A.
Brief Of Tax Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, Edward A. Zelinsky
Brief Of Tax Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, Edward A. Zelinsky
Amicus Briefs
Amici are professors of tax law at universities across the United States. As scholars and teachers, they have considered the doctrinal roots and practical consequences of judicial limits on state and local taxation. Amici join this brief solely on their own behalf and not as representatives of their universities. A full list of amici appears in the Appendix to this brief.