Law Commons^™

Antitrust Law - Standing - Direct Purchasers From Defendants' Competitors Lack Standing To Bring Treble Damage Action, Indirect Purchasers From Defendants Have Standing To Seek Injunctive Relief, Robert C. Mickle Jan 1980

Contribution In Antitrust Damage Actions, Robin Stone Sellers Jan 1979

Antitrust - Treble Damage Action - Illinois Brick Rule Does Not Bar Suit By Direct Purchaser Of Product Which Contains Price Fixed Component Produced By Seller, Jonathan Willinger Jan 1979

Mergers Under The Burger Court: An Anti-Antitrust Bias And Its Implications, Howard R. Lurie Jan 1978

Antitrust - Treble-Damage Action - Hanover Shoe Inc. Rule Bars Offensive Use Of Passing-On Doctrine By Indirect Purchaser, Karen Lee Turner Jan 1978

The Legal And Economic Status Of Vertical Restrictions, Joanne R. Alfano Jan 1978

Antitrust - Private Actions - Treble Damages - Group Boycott - No-Switching Agrements Among Competitors Is A Per Se Offense - Plaintiff Who Failed To Gain Employment Thereby Is Injured Within His Business Or Property And States A Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted, J. Kurt Straub Jan 1977

Interlocking Directorates - Present Anti-Trust Enforcement Interest Placed In Proper Analytical Perspective, James T. Halverson Jan 1976

The Confusing World Of Interstate Commerce And Jurisdiction Under The Sherman Act - A Look At The Development And Future Of The Currently Employed Jurisdictional Tests, Kevin S. Anderson Jan 1976

Antitrust - Standing - State Does Not Have Standing To Sue As Parens Patriae Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act For Damages To The General Economy Attributed To Violations Of The Antitrust Laws, James M. Papada Iii Jan 1972

The Patent-Antitrust Balance: Proposals For Change, N.R. Powers Jan 1972

Recent Developments, Various Editors Jan 1972

The Antitrust Plaintiff Following In The Government's Footsteps, Dolores Korman Jan 1970

Recent Developments, Various Editors Jan 1970