Law Commons^™

Legislation, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Budget Planners--Regulation To Protect Debtors

=====================================

Criminal Law--Taxation of Court Costs

=====================================

Statute of Limitations--Professional Negligence--Foreign Objects Left in Patient's Body

Contracts -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

Both the one year provision and the sale of goods provision of the Statute of Frauds were construed in Anderson-Gregory Co. v. Lea.'Regarding the duration of the contract, the facts in the opinion are somewhat sparse... The court held that the contract did not come within this provision of the statute. If a contract could have been performed, under its terms, within a year from the time of its making, it is not within the Statute of Frauds, even though it is improbable that the contract would be performed within a year.

=================

The Tennessee Supreme Court case of Oman …

Procedure -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, William I. Harbison

Vanderbilt Law Review

In two important decisions rendered during the survey period the Tennessee Supreme Court considered some of the aspects of joinder of actions under present circuit court practice. In the first of these, Necessary v. Gibson,' plaintiff joined a count for personal injuries resulting from defendants' alleged negligence with a count seeking recovery in contract based upon alleged promises of defendants to pay plaintiff for her injuries and expenses arising out of the same accident.

Torts -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade

Vanderbilt Law Review

The elements of a valid cause of action in negligence are specifically enumerated by Justice Holmes of the Tennessee Supreme Court in the case of Ruth v. Ruth:

1. A duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

2. A failure on the part of the defendant to perform that duty.

3. An injury to the plaintiff resulting proximately from the defendant's breach of that duty of care.

This outline will be used for the treatment of general questions of negligence, and particular fact situations will then be subsequently treated.