Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication
-
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979)) (9)
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979)) (6)
- Articles (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 76-1112, 76-1186 (573 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir. 1978)) (1)
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
Motion For Leave To File Brief Of Amicus Curiae - Brief Of Amicus Curiae Northwest Steelhead And Salmon Council Of Trout Unlimited
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Petitioner State Of Washington's Brief
Petitioner State Of Washington's Brief
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Motion For Leave To File Brief Amicus Curiae And Brief Amicus Curiae Of Pacific Legal Foundation In Support Of Petitioner State Of Washington, Petitioner Puget Sound Gillnetters Association, And Respondent Washington State Commerical Passenger Fishing Vessel Association
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Supplement To Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Coiurt Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Petitions Puget Sound Gillnetters Association And Purse Seine Vessel Owners Association
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief In Opposition For Respondent Indian Tribes
Brief In Opposition For Respondent Indian Tribes
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Respondent, Yakima Nation, In Opposition
Brief Of The Respondent, Yakima Nation, In Opposition
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Our Salty Rivers: Legal And Institutional Approaches To Salinity Management, Ralph W. Johnson
Our Salty Rivers: Legal And Institutional Approaches To Salinity Management, Ralph W. Johnson
Articles
The salinity problem in United States rivers becomes worse each year, and no water law system to date has been developed that adequately addresses salinity management. Professor Johnson discusses the salinity problem and its scope as well as remedial and preventative measures that have been taken in the past. He suggests combating the salinity problem by use of systems analysis, i.e., a comprehensive basinwide or regional management plan that analyzes the entire hydrological, economic, political, and agricultural system.
Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Petitioners, Intervenors
Reply Brief Of Petitioners, Intervenors
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenor Appellant Puget Sound Gillnetters Association In Nos. 77-3654 And 77-3655
Brief Of Intervenor Appellant Puget Sound Gillnetters Association In Nos. 77-3654 And 77-3655
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States And All Intervenor Tribes
Brief For The United States And All Intervenor Tribes
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Tulalip Tribes
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Appellee's Brief
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 76-1112, 76-1186 (573 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir. 1978))
No abstract provided.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence: A Model For Improved Evidentiary Decisionmaking In Washington, Robert H. Aronson
The Federal Rules Of Evidence: A Model For Improved Evidentiary Decisionmaking In Washington, Robert H. Aronson
Articles
This article discusses the underlying reasons for establishing rules of evidence, defines two unavoidable conflicts encountered in attempting to effectuate the purposes for adopting such rules, suggests that the Federal Rules of Evidence help resolve these conflicts by adhering to several clearly enunciated rationales, and, finally, indicates how the Rules recognize and accommodate important new scientific and social insights on the admissibility of evidence.
The Myth Of Legal Ethics, Eric Schnapper
The Myth Of Legal Ethics, Eric Schnapper
Articles
The moral platitudes found in the Code of Professional Responsibility have little to do with legal ethics as actually enforced.