Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Acree v. Acree (1)
- Anderson v. Van Landingham (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Astor v. Gross (1)
- Booth v. Booth (1)
-
- Code of Virginia (1)
- Davis v. Davis (1)
- Derby v. Derby (1)
- Dexter v. Dexter (1)
- Ellington v. Ellington (1)
- Fitchett v. Fitchett (1)
- Goetz v. Goetz (1)
- Gologanoff v. Gologanoff (1)
- Goodpasture v. Goodpasture (1)
- Hollowell v. Hollowell (1)
- Holmes v. Holmes (1)
- Index (1)
- Kaufman v. Kaufman (1)
- Kerr v. Kerr (1)
- Keyser v. Keyser (1)
- Kleinfield v. Veruki (1)
- Lambert v. Lambert (1)
- Mallery-Sayre v. Mallery (1)
- Papuchis v. Papuchis (1)
- Pledger v. Pledger (1)
- Pommerenke v. Pmmerenke (1)
- Reid v. Reid (1)
- Rock v. Rock (1)
- Sawyer v. Sawyer (1)
- Seehorn v. Seehorn (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Uniform Custodial Trust Act: An Alternative To Adult Guardianship, Louis A. Mezzullo, Michael C. Roach
The Uniform Custodial Trust Act: An Alternative To Adult Guardianship, Louis A. Mezzullo, Michael C. Roach
University of Richmond Law Review
The problems associated with court appointed guardianship are axiomatic. The public nature of the court proceeding required for appointment of a guardian is of concern to many families who become involved in the process. The expense and delay associated with the original hearing, as well as subsequent hearings that may be necessary in the operation of the guardianship, are also a great disadvantage of guardianship. As a means of managing property, guardianship is cumbersome, expensive and inflexible. Recently, stories of the expense and potential abuse of guardianship for adults have found their way into the popular press. While most people …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Domestic Relations, Lawrence D. Diehl
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Domestic Relations, Lawrence D. Diehl
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1989, the Virginia General Assembly enacted significant legislation authorizing the creation of an experimental family court. The experimental program is an attempt to examine the unification of the circuit court and the juvenile and domestic relations district court's jurisdiction of divorce cases. The program's goals include the elimination of duplicate hearings, the savings of client costs, and the elimination of de novo appeals.