Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ABA Code of Professional Responsibility (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Azzara v. Waller (1)
- Bragan v. Bragan (1)
- Brinkley v. Brinkley (1)
-
- Brown v. Brown (1)
- Cousins v. Cousins (1)
- Gibson v. Gibson (1)
- Graves v. Graves (1)
- Index (1)
- Lambert v. Lambert (1)
- Mitchell v. Mitchell (1)
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1)
- Morris v. Morris (1)
- Payne v. Payne (1)
- Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (1)
- Smoot v. Smoot (1)
- Surbey v. Surbey (1)
- Taylor v. Taylor (1)
- The Neutral Mediator: Value Dilemmas in Divorce Mediation (1)
- Wagner v. Wagner (1)
- Westbrook v. Westbrook (1)
- Yohay v. Ryan (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Domestic Relations, Donald K. Butler
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Domestic Relations, Donald K. Butler
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1988, the Virginia General Assembly made two significant changes with respect to child support awards. First, the authority of the court has been extended so that the court may order support for a child over the age of eighteen who is still attending high school. In order to award support for a child who is no longer a minor, the child must be "(i) a full-time high school senior, (ii) not self-supporting and (iii) living in the home of the parent seeking or receiving child support, until the child reaches the age of nineteen or graduates from high school, …
Facilitative Ethics In Divorce Mediation: A Law And Process Approach, Steven H. Hobbs
Facilitative Ethics In Divorce Mediation: A Law And Process Approach, Steven H. Hobbs
University of Richmond Law Review
Mediation is becoming a vital part of family legal problem solving and is creating new challenges for the lawyer practicing in the family law setting. The American Bar Association, the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and others recently have proposed standards of behavior for mediators where none have existed before. States also have attempted to define the appropriate realm of ethical practice for family mediation.