Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Cultural Heritage Law (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Indigenous Environmental Network And North Coast Rivers Alliance V. President Donald J. Trump, Et Al. And Tc Energy Corporation, Et Al., Kirsten D. Gerbatsch Ms.
Indigenous Environmental Network And North Coast Rivers Alliance V. President Donald J. Trump, Et Al. And Tc Energy Corporation, Et Al., Kirsten D. Gerbatsch Ms.
Public Land & Resources Law Review
A single cross-border pipeline project has been the epicenter of environmental litigation for the last decade—and it is not over yet. For years, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP and TC Energy have sought to construct and maintain a segment of the Keystone pipeline between the United States and Canada to connect existing pipeline infrastructure and transport crude oil. To do so, the company must first apply and be approved for a permit. Between 2008 and 2012, President Obama twice denied TransCanada Keystone Pipeline and TC Energy’s applications. Then, in 2017 and again in 2019, President Trump unilaterally invited TC Energy’s application …
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over …