Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Michigan Law School

1955

Deed

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Future Interests - Restraints On Alienation - Option To Repurchase At A Fixed Price, Edward H. Hoenicke S.Ed. Dec 1955

Future Interests - Restraints On Alienation - Option To Repurchase At A Fixed Price, Edward H. Hoenicke S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Shortly after his second marriage in 1925, plaintiff deeded a house and two lots to the parents of his first wife. The grantees, along with the plaintiff, had occupied the premises since the first wife's death. The deed contained a provision that "if the second parties do not wish at any time to use the property as a home, the first parties shall have the first privilege to purchase the above described property at any future time at the price stated in this deed, viz., $4,000." In 1952, after the death of both grantees and when the property was worth …


Real Property - Recording - Sufficiency Of Description For Notice, Elliott H. Levitas Nov 1955

Real Property - Recording - Sufficiency Of Description For Notice, Elliott H. Levitas

Michigan Law Review

The grantor owned the disputed property in Scurry County, Texas, when he purported to convey to A, by quit-claim deed, properties described as "all the oil, gas and mining leases ... located anywhere within the United States, most of which are located within the states of New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Texas." This instrument was recorded in Scurry County. Subsequently, the grantor executed a conveyance to B covering the Scurry County interests, and B, in turn, conveyed them to C. C's search of the record did not disclose the prior conveyance to A. In …


Boundaries: Description V. Survey, Olin L. Browder, Jr. Mar 1955

Boundaries: Description V. Survey, Olin L. Browder, Jr.

Michigan Law Review

These propositions I first encountered as a student in law school. At that time they struck me as rather startling propositions, which could not be reconciled with other things I had learned about the law of conveyancing. I do not recall exactly how they were disposed of: whether they were to be regarded as the law on the subject or merely as a couple of striking aberrations. There were too many other matters demanding attention at that time to allow much fretting over so small a question. Upon returning to the classroom some years later-but now sitting on the other …


Real Property - Grantor's Covenant To Insert Restrictions In Future Deeds As Personal Covenant, John B. Huck Feb 1955

Real Property - Grantor's Covenant To Insert Restrictions In Future Deeds As Personal Covenant, John B. Huck

Michigan Law Review

Certain farm owners, intending to subdivide the land, conveyed a lot to plaintiff by a deed restricting its use to residence purposes and providing that only single dwellings could be erected. The grantors covenanted to insert the same restrictions in future deeds to the rest of the land. Plaintiff recorded his deed. The grantors subsequently sold another lot to defendant church without inserting a similar restrictive covenant. Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin the erection of the church. On appeal from a decree for defendant, held, affirmed, three judges dissenting. The parties to the first deed, in providing for similar …


Real Property - General Scheme In Enforcement Of Restrictive Covenants, Herbert R. Brown Feb 1955

Real Property - General Scheme In Enforcement Of Restrictive Covenants, Herbert R. Brown

Michigan Law Review

Common grantor filed for record a plat of the subdivision in which defendant and plaintiff both own lots. Plaintiff alleged that the subdivision was restricted. Only three of fifteen subdivision deeds entered for record contained written restrictions, and the subdivision plat which had been filed did not show any restrictions. In an action brought by plaintiff to prevent the defendant from violating the alleged restrictions, held, temporary injunction restraining the defendant granted. The court found a general building scheme of which the defendant had actual notice when he purchased his lot.Womack v. Dean, (Tex. Civ. App. 1954) …