Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Contracts - Fraud -Tests Of Materiality In Deceit And On Rescission For Fraud
Contracts - Fraud -Tests Of Materiality In Deceit And On Rescission For Fraud
Michigan Law Review
Current decisions abundantly show the usefulness and efficiency of remedies based on rescission in contracts induced by fraud, as compared with damage remedies. Modern improvements in the rescission remedies go far to explain their popularity. On the other hand, the tests for "materiality" of misrepresentations that are unavoidably connected with the action of deceit have restricted its utility. Both the advantages of rescission and the disadvantages of damage remedies appear most clearly in a period of rapidly fluctuating and uncertain values. These considerations seem to justify a comparative study of the tests of "materiality" evolved by recent decisions in actions …
Contracts - Fraud - Effect Of Provision In Contract That Representations Of Seller's Agent Are Not Binding
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued on promissory notes given it by defendant in part payment of the purchase price for a dumptor. Defendant counterclaimed on the ground that he was induced to buy the dumptor because of fraudulent misrepresentations made by the plaintiff's agent. The contract contained the stipulation that "no representations made by an agent not included herein shall be binding," and therefore the plaintiff contended that the jury could not consider any of the false statements made by its agent. Held, said statement is ineffectual to preclude the defendant from asserting fraud. National Equipment Corp. v. Volden, (Minn. 1934) …
Corporations - Duty Of Director To Stockholder On Stock Exchange Sales
Corporations - Duty Of Director To Stockholder On Stock Exchange Sales
Michigan Law Review
The recent case of Goodwin v. Agassiz presents the problem of the duty owed by a director to existing and prospective stockholders in its most typical and difficult form. The defendants were president and general manager, respectively, as well as directors of the Cliff Mining Corporation which owned mineral lands in Northern Michigan. The stock of the corporation was listed on the Boston Stock Exchange. The defendants in their capacity of directors had knowledge of a geologist's report which forecast possible existence of copper deposits in the corporation's lands. The defendants were also directors of another mining corporation owning lands …