Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Armed Career Criminal Act (2)
- Johnson v. United States (2)
- Punishment (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
-
- Antitrust Division (1)
- Beckles v. United States (1)
- Congress (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Criminal Division (1)
- Criminal behavior (1)
- Criminal liability (1)
- Criminal prosecution of corporations (1)
- Deferred prosecution (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Deterrent value (1)
- Economic models (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Expressive theory (1)
- Expressive value (1)
- Felonies (1)
- Global financial crisis (1)
- Justice Department (1)
- Moral content (1)
- Non-prosecution agreements (1)
- Norm-setting (1)
- Portmanteau variable (1)
- Post release (1)
- Postconvition review (1)
- Prisoners (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
How The Sentencing Commission Does And Does Not Matter In Beckles V. United States, Leah Litman, Luke C. Beasley
How The Sentencing Commission Does And Does Not Matter In Beckles V. United States, Leah Litman, Luke C. Beasley
Articles
Two years ago, in Johnson v. United States, the Supreme Court held that the so-called “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is unconstitutionally vague. Last spring, the Court made this rule retroactive in Welch v. United States. Then in June, the Court granted certiorari in Beckles v. United States to resolve two questions that have split lower courts in the wake of Johnson and Welch: (1) whether an identically worded “residual clause” in a U.S. Sentencing Guideline—known as the career offender Guideline—is unconstitutionally void for vagueness; and (2) if so, whether the rule invalidating the Guideline’s residual …
Jurisdiction And Resentencing: How Prosecutorial Waiver Can Offer Remedies Congress Has Denied, Leah Litman, Luke C. Beasley
Jurisdiction And Resentencing: How Prosecutorial Waiver Can Offer Remedies Congress Has Denied, Leah Litman, Luke C. Beasley
Articles
This Essay is about what prosecutors can do to ensure that prisoners with meritorious legal claims have a remedy. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) imposes draconian conditions on when prisoners may file successive petitions for post-conviction review (that is, more than one petition for post-conviction review). AEDPA’s restrictions on post-conviction review are so severe that they routinely prevent prisoners with meritorious claims from vindicating those claims.
Portmanteau Ascendant: Post-Release Regulations And Sex Offender Recidivism, J. J. Prescott
Portmanteau Ascendant: Post-Release Regulations And Sex Offender Recidivism, J. J. Prescott
Articles
The purported purpose of sex offender post-release regulations (e.g., community notification and residency restrictions) is the reduction of sex offender recidivism. On their face, these laws seem well-designed and likely to be effective. A simple economic framework of offender behavior can be used to formalize these basic intuitions: in essence, post-release regulations either increase the probability of detection or increase the immediate cost of engaging in the prohibited activity (or both), and so should reduce the likelihood of criminal behavior. These laws aim to incapacitate people outside of prison. Yet, empirical researchers to date have found essentially no reliable evidence …
The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution, David M. Uhlmann
The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution, David M. Uhlmann
Articles
Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and practitioners about the role of corporate criminal prosecution. Some argue that corporations should face criminal prosecution for their misconduct, while others would reserve criminal prosecution for individual corporate officials. Perhaps as a result of this conflict, there has been a dramatic increase over the last decade in the use of deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements for some corporate crimes, even as the government continues to bring criminal charges for other corporate crimes. To move beyond our erratic approach to corporate crime, we need a better …