Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 44

Full-Text Articles in Law

Private Rights And Private Wrongs, Andrew S. Gold Apr 2017

Private Rights And Private Wrongs, Andrew S. Gold

Michigan Law Review

Review of Private Wrongs by Arthur Ripstein.


On Strict Liability Crimes: Preserving A Moral Framework For Criminal Intent In An Intent-Free Moral World, W. Robert Thomas Feb 2012

On Strict Liability Crimes: Preserving A Moral Framework For Criminal Intent In An Intent-Free Moral World, W. Robert Thomas

Michigan Law Review

The law has long recognized a presumption against criminal strict liability. This Note situates that presumption in terms of moral intuitions about the role of intention and the unique nature of criminal punishment. Two sources-recent laws from state legislatures and recent advances in moral philosophy-pose distinct challenges to the presumption against strict liability crimes. This Note offers a solution to the philosophical problem that informs how courts could address the legislative problem. First, it argues that the purported problem from philosophy stems from a mistaken relationship drawn between criminal law and morality. Second, it outlines a slightly more nuanced moral …


Science, Humanity, And Atrocity: A Lawyerly Examination, Steven D. Smith May 2006

Science, Humanity, And Atrocity: A Lawyerly Examination, Steven D. Smith

Michigan Law Review

Joseph Vining's reflection on (as the subtitle indicates) the claims of science and humanity begins with a terse but disturbing recitation of these and similar scientific experiments conducted on human beings during the twentieth century in Manchuria, Nazi Germany, and Pol Pot's Cambodia. The incidents are conveyed through quotations, sometimes of the coldly clinical prose that the researchers themselves chose as most suitable for their purposes. These quotations are juxtaposed against others from an array of distinguished scientists and philosophers explaining the naturalistic cosmology that, in the view of these thinkers, modern science has given us: it is a stark, …


Was The Frog Prince Sexually Molested?: A Review Of Peter Westen's The Logic Of Consent, Heidi M. Hurd May 2005

Was The Frog Prince Sexually Molested?: A Review Of Peter Westen's The Logic Of Consent, Heidi M. Hurd

Michigan Law Review

Peter Westen's The Logic of Consent is nothing short of a tour de force. In the tradition of the very best and most significant contributions to legal theory, Professor Westen demonstrates that we do not know what we think we know about a capacity that on a daily basis turns trespasses into dinner parties, brutal batteries into football games, rape into lovemaking, and the commercial appropriation of name and likeness into biography. While we all employ claims of consent in everyday moral gossip to absolve some and withhold sympathy from others, and while courts of law across the nation commonly …


The Unruliness Of Rules, Peter A. Alces May 2003

The Unruliness Of Rules, Peter A. Alces

Michigan Law Review

Analytical jurisprudence depends on a posited relation between rules and morality. Before we may answer persistent and important questions of legal theory - indeed, before we can even know what those questions are - we must understand not just the operation of rules but their operation in relation to morality. Once that relationship is formulated, we may then come to terms with the likes of inductive reasoning in Law, the role of precedent, and the fit, such as it is, between Natural Law and Positivism as well as even the coincidence (or lack thereof) between inclusive and exclusive positivism. That …


Pragmatism Regained, Christopher Kutz Jan 2002

Pragmatism Regained, Christopher Kutz

Michigan Law Review

Jules Coleman's The Practice of Principle serves as a focal point for current, newly intensified debates in legal theory, and provides some of the deepest, most sustained reflections on methodology that legal theory has seen. Coleman is one of the leading legal philosophers in the Anglo-American world, and his writings on tort theory, contract theory, the normative foundations of law and economics, social choice theory, and analytical jurisprudence have been the point of departure for much of the most interesting activity in the field for the last three decades. Indeed, the origin of this book lies in Oxford University's invitation …


Rights Against Rules: The Moral Structure Of American Constitutional Law, Matthew D. Adler Oct 1998

Rights Against Rules: The Moral Structure Of American Constitutional Law, Matthew D. Adler

Michigan Law Review

The Bill of Rights, by means of open-ended terms such as "freedom of speech," "equal protection," or "due process," refers to moral criteria, which take on constitutional status by virtue of being thus referenced. We can disagree about whether the proper methodology for judicial application of these criteria is originalist or nonoriginalist. The originalist looks, not to the true content of the moral criteria named by the Constitution, but to the framers' beliefs about that content; the nonoriginalist tries to determine what the criteria truly require, and ignores or gives less weight to the framers' views. Bracketing this disagreement, however, …


Kahan On Mistakes, Daniel Yeager Jun 1998

Kahan On Mistakes, Daniel Yeager

Michigan Law Review

In Ignorance of Law Is an Excuse - but Only for the Virtuous, Professor Dan Kahan reconciles what I had thought was an irreconcilable body of law. To be sure, imposing order on whether and when mistakes of law should pass as responsibility-evading accounts of untoward actions is far from light work. Yet Kahan somehow pulls it off in just twenty-seven pages. In addition to acknowledging the importance of Professor Kahan's essay, I write here to point out if not correct what might have been two oversights in his view of the meaning and operation of mistakes. First, Kahan never …


Reply: Is Ignorance Of Fact An Excuse Only For The Virtuous?, Dan M. Kahan Jun 1998

Reply: Is Ignorance Of Fact An Excuse Only For The Virtuous?, Dan M. Kahan

Michigan Law Review

Professor Yeager's thoughtful response to my essay has convinced me that there is indeed a connection worth noting between the mistake of law doctrine and the mistake of fact doctrine. Yeager suggests that my position on mistake of law reduces to the view that someone who would be guilty of a "lesser wrong" were things as he perceived them to be may be punished for the "greater wrong" that he actually commits - a conception of mistake of fact that has provoked fierce denunciation from commentators. But I would in fact put things slightly differently: under both doctrines courts excuse …


Ignorance Of Law Is An Excuse - But Only For The Virtuous, Dan M. Kahan Oct 1997

Ignorance Of Law Is An Excuse - But Only For The Virtuous, Dan M. Kahan

Michigan Law Review

It's axiomatic that "ignorance of the law is no excuse." My aim in this essay is to examine what the "mistake of law doctrine" reveals about the relationship between criminal law and morality in general and about the law's understanding of moral responsibility in particular. The conventional understanding of the mistake of law doctrine rests on two premises, which are encapsulated in the Holmesian epigrams with which I've started this essay. The first is liberal positivism. As a descriptive claim, liberal positivism holds that the content of the law can be identified without reference to morality: one needn't be a …


A More Democratic Liberalism, Joshua Cohen May 1994

A More Democratic Liberalism, Joshua Cohen

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Political Liberalism


A Morality Fit For Humans, Joseph Raz May 1993

A Morality Fit For Humans, Joseph Raz

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Human Morality by Samuel Scheffler


Whose Loyalties?, Christina Whitman Jan 1993

Whose Loyalties?, Christina Whitman

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Loyalty: An Essay on the Morality of Relationships by George P. Fletcher


Conceptions Of Value In Legal Thought, Richard H. Pildes May 1992

Conceptions Of Value In Legal Thought, Richard H. Pildes

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Love's Knowledge by Martha C. Nussbaum


Moral Foundations Of Constitutional Thought: Current Problems, Augustinian Prospects, Arthur J. Burke May 1991

Moral Foundations Of Constitutional Thought: Current Problems, Augustinian Prospects, Arthur J. Burke

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Moral Foundations of Constitutional Thought: Current Problems, Augustinian Prospects by Graham Walker


Beyond The Constitution, Christopher J. Peters May 1991

Beyond The Constitution, Christopher J. Peters

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Beyond the Constitution by Hadley Arkes


Hating Criminals: How Can Something That Feels So Good Be Wrong?, Joshua Dressler May 1990

Hating Criminals: How Can Something That Feels So Good Be Wrong?, Joshua Dressler

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Forgiveness and Mercy by Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jean Hampton


Moralistic Liberalism And Legal Moralism, Robert P. George May 1990

Moralistic Liberalism And Legal Moralism, Robert P. George

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Harmless Wrongdoing: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law by Joel Feinberg


Lawyer's Justice, William A. Edmundson May 1990

Lawyer's Justice, William A. Edmundson

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study by David Luban, and The Social Responsibilities of Lawyers: Case Studies by Philip B. Heymann and Lance Liebman


The Right To Disobey, Joel Feinberg May 1989

The Right To Disobey, Joel Feinberg

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Conflicts of Law and Morality by Kent Greenwalt


Arguing About Rights, Charles M. Yablon May 1987

Arguing About Rights, Charles M. Yablon

Michigan Law Review

A Review of by Rex Martin


The Moral Dimensions Of Politics, Steven G. Bradbury May 1987

The Moral Dimensions Of Politics, Steven G. Bradbury

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Moral Dimensions of Politics by Richard J. Regan


Jurisprudence: A Descriptive And Normative Analysis Of Law, Christopher P. Portman Apr 1986

Jurisprudence: A Descriptive And Normative Analysis Of Law, Christopher P. Portman

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Jurisprudence: A Descriptive and Normative Analysis of Law by Anthony D'Amato


The Morality Of Obedience, Joseph Raz Feb 1985

The Morality Of Obedience, Joseph Raz

Michigan Law Review

A Review of A Theory of Law by Philip Soper


Law, Morality, And The Relations Of States, Michigan Law Review Feb 1985

Law, Morality, And The Relations Of States, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Law, Morality, and the Relations of States by Terry Nardin


Founders And Foundations Of Legal Positivism, David Lyons Feb 1984

Founders And Foundations Of Legal Positivism, David Lyons

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Essays on Bentham: Studies In Jurisprudence and Political Theory by H.L.A. Hart, and John Austin by W.L. Morison


Intuition And Security In Moral Philosophy, Stephen R. Munzer Feb 1984

Intuition And Security In Moral Philosophy, Stephen R. Munzer

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point by R.M. Hare


Injustice, Inequality And Ethics, Michigan Law Review Feb 1984

Injustice, Inequality And Ethics, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Injustice, Inequality, and Ethics by Robin Barrow


Promises, Morals, And Law, Michigan Law Review Mar 1983

Promises, Morals, And Law, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Promises, Morals, and Law by P.S. Atiyah


Utilitarianism Reformed, L. W. Sumner Mar 1982

Utilitarianism Reformed, L. W. Sumner

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Utilitarianism and Co-operation by Donald H. Regan